by radon » Sat 21 Jan 2012, 06:28:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')Not really. The USSR was socialised wealth bankrupted by private wealth. The current crisis is private wealth stealing from socialised wealth (again). Can you see the difference?
It is no wonder that the West still fears the Russians. The ex-Soviets know only too well what is afoot. And they also realise that bumblekins such as yourself...
I am an ex-Soviet myself, not sure about bumblekins whoever they are. I appreciate that Quinny's main question was almost rhetorical. What I meant was that ECB lending directly to sovereigns would literally, technically operate as a Soviet financial ministry. After decades of IMF-sponsored ordeal aimed exactly at destroying this arrangement, reintroducing it in the EU is a no go. This is a side issue, but in practical terms, it is an important one, along with other some other side issues that I tried to pick up. As to the main issue - many posters including yourself commented on it quite extensively above.
However, there are a number of side technical issues that make ECB operate in the way it does. If ECB finances the countries directly, try answer the following questions:
What if a sovereign defaults?
What if the sovereign continues to expand its budget deficit?
What if it is practical to stop financing one country while continue financing another? (watch nationalist backlash)
and so on.
With regard to the interest rate differential between the ECB lending rate and sovereign bonds yields - see the posts above + the formal risk argument. Technically, under the current arrangement it is the banks that assume the risk of default by sovereigns, rather than the ECB. It is one thing to let a bank to go under (with all the usual "too big to fail" caveats), and another - to let a sovereign to go under. The ECB would probably prefer to avoid being enmeshed in inter-sovereign politics to the extent possible and keep its options open. If the ECB opens the flood gate of direct finance it is not clear how this could then be stopped.