Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

A rant about the Peak Oil movement

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby evilgenius » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 11:52:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'W')hat is reprehensible and disgusting about the truth?


+1

JMG is probably the most intelligent person talking about peak oil today. Maybe when he says something about needy people's access to medicine it doesn't say anything about his morals, but about him warning. I take certain meds routinely and I have worried about whether I will be able to get them still if something like the crash that was threatened when the economy nearly went titsup under Bush were to happen unimpeded. I can only hope somebody will be making the stuff I need, but how and why if the money system is broken? If my medicines go away it certainly wouldn't be JMG's fault. I don't resent him warning me about it either. Perhaps if I had diabetes or some other illness that can come from being two tons overweight or from pouring sugar down my throat day on day and year on year I might resent him saying it. I might even feel justified in resenting him saying it. In my case, however, my meds are because of an accident I was in as a child. I can only wish that losing weight or changing the way I eat could help me. I don't have much sympathy for some petulant person who cries wolf at the first insult upon their personal kingdom. Nor do I for the chronically ill who haven't brought it on themselves, but allow their fear of losing their meds to color their judgement of someone who is merely talking sense. Fear is not a sound basis for problem solving in case the worst case scenario actually does happen.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Pops » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 12:07:37

Hey KJ, long time - no talk. Didja get some snow?

I appreciated your rant. We seem to like gurus and suck down whatever our favorite soothsayer spouts without chewing, I guess so we don't have to go to the trouble of thinking. Too many movies maybe, the 'willing suspension of disbelief' is habit.

You gotta remember though, a goodly number of the first PO acolytes were converts from other cults; radical enviros, Y2k, the militia/social anarchy faction, the genuine apocalypse, etc. They were looking for Overnight Armageddon and PO fit the bill to a tee. Lots of folks here were dreaming about the "run for the hills" excuse, some like me were already heading there (for a variety of reasons) and others like yourself had already been there a while, it was a perfect situation for Gurus to sprout.

People search for the prophet that preaches the gospel the direction their own knee jerks. Then they set that as their favorite channel and never stray again. Look at fracking, it obviously means something but who can tell what at this point? Still, it is either dismissed whole cloth or hailed as the second coming of the Energy Fairy depending on your guru.

Oh well, hang in there.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 15:43:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')og said,

What is reprehensible and disgusting about the truth?


How can something be "the truth" when it hasn't occurred? Do you have any idea how silly you sound?

This is typical of the likes of the "archdruid" and other cultists:Their proclamations about a non-existent future are deemed "true" utterances, and when they fail to materialize, they are simply shuffled off until a later date.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 15:48:21

Pops: "We seem to like gurus and suck down whatever our favorite soothsayer spouts without chewing, I guess so we don't have to go to the trouble of thinking. Too many movies maybe, the 'willing suspension of disbelief' is habit."

The habit of mind to simply confirm what has already been bought as whole cloth prevails over the most logical course: To search for evidence that disconfirms.

That's the problem with soothsayers: all they have to say it "yet." It hasn't happened "yet."

At least Simmons put a time lock on his prediction of $200 oil. His heart attack saved him from the embarrassment of having to admit failure.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Cog » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 17:11:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')og said,

What is reprehensible and disgusting about the truth?


How can something be "the truth" when it hasn't occurred? Do you have any idea how silly you sound?

This is typical of the likes of the "archdruid" and other cultists:Their proclamations about a non-existent future are deemed "true" utterances, and when they fail to materialize, they are simply shuffled off until a later date.


Think it through for a bit if you can. If the industrial world that we have become accustomed to crashes, who is going to make all those medications that keep people artificially alive? Are you and your friends going to man the pharma factories to keep production going?
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 17:47:59

"If the industrial world that we have become accustomed to crashes,..."

"If a comet strikes the earth...."

"If the Yellowstone supervolcano explodes...."

Big "ifs."
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby thuja » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 20:56:28

Fast Crashers ruined the perception of Peak Oil as a concern of cranks and uberdoomers.

Now that they are mostly vanquished, I think its high time we rebranded and banished the Peak Oil= insta doom/die-off meme.

This is a very very serious topic that already has had dramatic repurcussions to the golbal economy. It is possible that it will surpass all other problems to be the most compelling and damaging problem to modern civilization (even surpassing climate change in the short term.)

For that reason, the Peak Oil "movement" needs a reboot. A more cogent argument for ramifications of Peak Oil based on a slow crash model need to be posited.
No Soup for You!!
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Bruce_S » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 22:05:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ') A more cogent argument for ramifications of Peak Oil based on a slow crash model need to be posited.


I agree. But why do we need an argument when we have reality? Oil prices gradually trending higher, transition to eco-friendly transport, another shift (like the 70's) towards more efficient GDP creation per barrel of crude, more close-distance compatible neighborhoods, peak demand lessening need for crude in the developed world in general, and presto, a slow crash (slow crash in crude use anyway) scenario. Now that the fast crashers have been ousted, it seems only fair to entertain the idea that no crashing at all is required, or at least no more than has already happened.
Bruce_S
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011, 21:45:40
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby peripato » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 23:51:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce_S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ') A more cogent argument for ramifications of Peak Oil based on a slow crash model need to be posited.


I agree. But why do we need an argument when we have reality? Oil prices gradually trending higher, transition to eco-friendly transport, another shift (like the 70's) towards more efficient GDP creation per barrel of crude, more close-distance compatible neighborhoods, peak demand lessening need for crude in the developed world in general, and presto, a slow crash (slow crash in crude use anyway) scenario. Now that the fast crashers have been ousted, it seems only fair to entertain the idea that no crashing at all is required, or at least no more than has already happened.

In what way has a fast crash been averted? If you mean that doubling down on debt, scouring the bottom of the oil barrel and rampant denial, all the while as the world's population is growing by 1 billion people every 12 years, has permanently staved off disaster, then I have a road to perdition to sell you.

All that's happened is that we are just going further and further out on a limb. Call it overshoot; with more people, GDP and infrastructure to try and support every day, on a finite planet, with declining natural resources of a sort that we see as essential, but that cannot easily, readily or cheaply be replaced. The end can be delayed by economic trickery, institutional inertia and cultural myopia, but not forever.

Indeed we are witnessing just this situation playing out before us every day, in the machinations of governments and central banks around the world determined to keep the economic status quo that blew up back in 2007 going, even as each set of new wheels keeps coming off. Nature cares not for our sensibilities, political persuasions, or ideologies. The longer its delayed just means that when the end comes the resulting crash will be swifter and more resounding than if it had done so from a lower threshold. You can bank on that.
Last edited by peripato on Wed 02 Nov 2011, 23:56:48, edited 1 time in total.
"Don’t panic, Wall St. is safe!"
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby ralfy » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 23:55:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce_S', '
')
I agree. But why do we need an argument when we have reality? Oil prices gradually trending higher, transition to eco-friendly transport, another shift (like the 70's) towards more efficient GDP creation per barrel of crude, more close-distance compatible neighborhoods, peak demand lessening need for crude in the developed world in general, and presto, a slow crash (slow crash in crude use anyway) scenario. Now that the fast crashers have been ousted, it seems only fair to entertain the idea that no crashing at all is required, or at least no more than has already happened.



That's because "reality" shows a series of "fast crashes" amidst a global slow crash, as seen in flooding, social unrest, nuclear power plant meltdowns, and other problems that are taking place. There's also a possibility of "catastrophic bifurcation," where a series of localized "fast crashes" can have a domino effect. Finally, when we look for ways to lessen demand and to localize, that doesn't mean that we "ousted" fast crashers. Rather, it's the opposite: we're looking for ways to avoid a fast crash.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Bruce_S » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 00:04:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')In what way has a fast crash been averted?


Peak oil happened, and we didn't get a fast crash. This doesn't preclude a fast crash for other reasons I suppose. From that respect, we just need to dream up a new reason for fast crash? The beauty of an oil induced crash though had some really good pieces to it though, oil leading to food, lack of food and distribution leading to starvation, starvation leading to fedghettos and die off. All nice and neat.

To create a fast crash from a financial mess, we need to explain how people all die without credit. Someone cut my credit card limit in half and it killed me...not quite so clear cut.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')Indeed we are witnessing just this situation playing out before us every day, in the machinations of governments and central banks around the world determined to keep the economic status quo that blew up back in 2007 going, even as each set of new wheels keeps coming off. Nature cares not for our sensibilities, political persuasions, or ideologies.


Nature giving a crap worked pretty good when it was geology triggering the mess, but economics? Man made economics, and we can change the rules of it any time we wish, because economics isn't nature. Governments can change the rules any time they wish, force people to work on farms ala Heinberg, print money, freeze wages and prices, whatever they think will work. Nature is so much more clean, which is why peak oil worked pretty good for a fast crash trigger, and economics, not so much.
Bruce_S
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011, 21:45:40
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Bruce_S » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 00:13:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')That's because "reality" shows a series of "fast crashes" amidst a global slow crash, as seen in flooding, social unrest, nuclear power plant meltdowns, and other problems that are taking place.


And all those things happened before, and we didn't have a fast crash then either. Flooding in 1825 in New Orleans, 1543 in Tennessee and others to numerous to count, social unrest during the Irish potato famine and women's suffrage, prohibition and the attempted colonization of the Zulu, nuke plant meltdowns at TMI and Chernobyl, and whatever other problems you can line up. We didn't fast collapse from any of them, and certainly their is no evidence these things will do it this time either. Now, if you want to talk dino killing meteorite strikes and super volcanos, maybe a decent gamma burst, now we can talk about fast crashes. But this penny-ante stuff? Unlikely.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')There's also a possibility of "catastrophic bifurcation," where a series of localized "fast crashes" can have a domino effect. Finally, when we look for ways to lessen demand and to localize, that doesn't mean that we "ousted" fast crashers. Rather, it's the opposite: we're looking for ways to avoid a fast crash.


And succeeding, apparently. Go humans!
Bruce_S
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011, 21:45:40
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby peripato » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 01:12:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce_S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')In what way has a fast crash been averted?


Peak oil happened, and we didn't get a fast crash. This doesn't preclude a fast crash for other reasons I suppose. From that respect, we just need to dream up a new reason for fast crash? The beauty of an oil induced crash though had some really good pieces to it though, oil leading to food, lack of food and distribution leading to starvation, starvation leading to fedghettos and die off. All nice and neat.

To create a fast crash from a financial mess, we need to explain how people all die without credit. Someone cut my credit card limit in half and it killed me...not quite so clear cut.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')Indeed we are witnessing just this situation playing out before us every day, in the machinations of governments and central banks around the world determined to keep the economic status quo that blew up back in 2007 going, even as each set of new wheels keeps coming off. Nature cares not for our sensibilities, political persuasions, or ideologies.


Nature giving a crap worked pretty good when it was geology triggering the mess, but economics? Man made economics, and we can change the rules of it any time we wish, because economics isn't nature. Governments can change the rules any time they wish, force people to work on farms ala Heinberg, print money, freeze wages and prices, whatever they think will work. Nature is so much more clean, which is why peak oil worked pretty good for a fast crash trigger, and economics, not so much.

How do you know peak oil has happened? Have we seen permanent shortages yet?
For a society reliant on just in time delivery and credit to procure goods and services a sudden financial collapse could be very life-threatening.
A fast crash as a consequence of overshoot is also a familiar process in biology. Since we are biological creatures then we are prey to the same dynamic, as has happened in the past in regional restricted cases. This time we are setting the stage for a global population crash. Usual modus operandi for human culling is war, pestilence, famine and disease. Only the timing, severity and duration, alas, remain unknown.
Indeed, economics and politics can do many things, including kicking the can down the road, however they cannot repeal the laws of nature.
"Don’t panic, Wall St. is safe!"
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Bruce_S » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 08:34:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')How do you know peak oil has happened? Have we seen permanent shortages yet?


Peak oil is not defined by permanent shortages, but by a declining overall production rate. And it was called by, and verified, by someone who even knows something about geology, versus the gang of never do wells who discredited the movement in general.

http://www.princeton.edu/hubbert/curren ... -07-a.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')Indeed, economics and politics can do many things, including kicking the can down the road, however they cannot repeal the laws of nature.


Which is why peak oil worked well as a fast crash trigger, and economics (which don't have much to do with nature) does not. Sure things can get messed up, look at the fall of 2008. But we didn't even get a dieoff going because governments can intervene in economic messes (kicking the can down the road) and they might be able to do it for...years? (already) decades? centuries?
Bruce_S
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011, 21:45:40
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby peripato » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 09:58:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce_S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')How do you know peak oil has happened? Have we seen permanent shortages yet?


Peak oil is not defined by permanent shortages, but by a declining overall production rate. And it was called by, and verified, by someone who even knows something about geology, versus the gang of never do wells who discredited the movement in general.

http://www.princeton.edu/hubbert/curren ... -07-a.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '
')Indeed, economics and politics can do many things, including kicking the can down the road, however they cannot repeal the laws of nature.


Which is why peak oil worked well as a fast crash trigger, and economics (which don't have much to do with nature) does not. Sure things can get messed up, look at the fall of 2008. But we didn't even get a dieoff going because governments can intervene in economic messes (kicking the can down the road) and they might be able to do it for...years? (already) decades? centuries?

Peak oil leads to involuntary declining production, brought about by the immutable laws of physics and geology - not some vaguely permanent plateau, which is a passing human construct. You only have to look at the production curves of the dozens of producer countries which have already passed that milestone to understand this. Also, plateaus, being unstable by nature, eventually flip violently from that state to a chaotic one, before settling down to another impermanent state of equilibrium. In fact, the longer a state of equilibrium exists, the more violent the change when it happens. Now, have we seen involuntary declines in world production yet? No, because if we'd had we would not be here enjoying the internet today, since in a world of permanent and ongoing production declines we would also be seeing permanent and ongoing economic contraction.

Economics does not exist outside of the natural world, despite the exhortations of economists and other simpletons, but is rather a subset of it. Physical limits are now popping up left, right and centre - financial, resource, climatic, to name just three and at an accelerating rate of impact on modern civilisation. Blind Freddy can see that papering over the issues, as politicians and people do, will not prevent such things from building up to exploding point. One or more of these barriers to growth will provide the proximate trigger for collapse of industrial society and the bloated, infantilised population that is utterly dependent on it for its survival. I do concede that the timing, severity and duration of this crash are unknown, but I have no illusions that it will be quite spectacularly awful. I only hope I'm not alive to see it.
"Don’t panic, Wall St. is safe!"
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby evilgenius » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 10:43:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', '&')quot;If the industrial world that we have become accustomed to crashes,..."

"If a comet strikes the earth...."

"If the Yellowstone supervolcano explodes...."

Big "ifs."


I get it, you won't accept anything other than what you see in front of your own eyes. That is the first part of the scientific method, that evidence should be empirical. You read somebody's scenario explaining a range of possibilities and you don't see them, so you discount what they have said. There is nothing wrong with being a pragmatist. The only trouble is that there is a second part of the scientific method wherein hypotheses take place. If you don't have the capacity to hypothesize, then you are stuck with only what you can touch, see, taste. Science lays no claim to being right. Even touch, see and taste are unstable. Whatever point I was trying to make about how I interpret Greer is lost on you. There just isn't any reason for me to try to explain something to you that you will never understand.

As for JMG being some kind of cult leader, give me a break.
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby killJOY » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 16:11:13

The peak oil cult has no time for hypothesizing: they're too busy "prepping" for their dogmatic collapse.

As for the druid dude: He's no more reliable on peak oil than Jimmy Swaggart. "All religions are in the same bucket," as my anthropology teacher used to say.

So do you agree with him that everyone who currently survives through the use of medications is going to die? If so, then why aren't you calling up these people and telling them to start hoarding their meds? Are you that callous?

Just about every peak oil pundit has turned out to be a jackass. Call Mr Greer the Arch Jackass.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Bruce_S » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 19:47:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', 'T')he peak oil cult has no time for hypothesizing: they're too busy "prepping" for their dogmatic collapse.


By using quotes around "prepping" are you implying that they aren't? Or that "prepping" can mean nearly anything (and if everyone here was really living an agro-utopian lifestyle, they probably wouldn't have the time, energy or computer to actually post)?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('killJOY', '
')
Just about every peak oil pundit has turned out to be a jackass. Call Mr Greer the Arch Jackass.


I don't know, Deffeyes seems to have done pretty well, calling peak oil in 2005 in advance, and then continuing to defend it as recently as July of 2011. I'll admit that more than a few of the others meet your description, and some of them have had at least the good grace to run off and take up other endeavors to try and lessen the albatross of their reputation around their neck.
Bruce_S
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011, 21:45:40
Top

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby Loki » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 21:43:07

I like Greer. He's a bright guy, a good writer (if a bit verbose), has a good grasp of history, and I've found a lot of his points to be quite thought provoking. I particularly enjoy his long duree view of history, which is unusual in this era.

But when he starts talking about “magic” and “green wizardry” my eyes glaze over. I just don't find those useful or compelling metaphors. On the contrary, it makes me take everything else he has to say with a grain of salt.

That's not to say that he doesn't offer useful information. I read his blog most every week, I've learned from Greer, just as I've learned from Kunstler, despite his fantasy novels and irritatingly elitist “cultural criticism.” Hell, I've probably even learned from Savinar :lol:

Peak oil is kinda fringey. I'm OK with that. We should certainly call BS on the hyper-hysterical types and be honest about our mistakes, but it's illogical to dismiss the entire peak oil concept just because some of it's more vocal proponents have been eccentrics and nutcases. I think the geology speaks for itself.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: A rant about the Peak Oil movement

Unread postby peripato » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 22:52:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'I') like Greer. He's a bright guy, a good writer (if a bit verbose), has a good grasp of history, and I've found a lot of his points to be quite thought provoking. I particularly enjoy his long duree view of history, which is unusual in this era.

But when he starts talking about “magic” and “green wizardry” my eyes glaze over. I just don't find those useful or compelling metaphors. On the contrary, it makes me take everything else he has to say with a grain of salt.

That's not to say that he doesn't offer useful information. I read his blog most every week, I've learned from Greer, just as I've learned from Kunstler, despite his fantasy novels and irritatingly elitist “cultural criticism.” Hell, I've probably even learned from Savinar :lol:

Peak oil is kinda fringey. I'm OK with that. We should certainly call BS on the hyper-hysterical types and be honest about our mistakes, but it's illogical to dismiss the entire peak oil concept just because some of it's more vocal proponents have been eccentrics and nutcases. I think the geology speaks for itself.

+1. To paraphrase; Depletion is out there, it can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until we are dead. 8)
"Don’t panic, Wall St. is safe!"
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron