by Bruce_S » Thu 03 Nov 2011, 00:13:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')That's because "reality" shows a series of "fast crashes" amidst a global slow crash, as seen in flooding, social unrest, nuclear power plant meltdowns, and other problems that are taking place.
And all those things happened before, and we didn't have a fast crash then either. Flooding in 1825 in New Orleans, 1543 in Tennessee and others to numerous to count, social unrest during the Irish potato famine and women's suffrage, prohibition and the attempted colonization of the Zulu, nuke plant meltdowns at TMI and Chernobyl, and whatever other problems you can line up. We didn't fast collapse from any of them, and certainly their is no evidence these things will do it this time either. Now, if you want to talk dino killing meteorite strikes and super volcanos, maybe a decent gamma burst, now we can talk about fast crashes. But this penny-ante stuff? Unlikely.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ralfy', '
')There's also a possibility of "catastrophic bifurcation," where a series of localized "fast crashes" can have a domino effect. Finally, when we look for ways to lessen demand and to localize, that doesn't mean that we "ousted" fast crashers. Rather, it's the opposite: we're looking for ways to avoid a fast crash.
And succeeding, apparently. Go humans!