by PrestonSturges » Sun 23 Oct 2011, 16:37:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'I') will try dig out some Popper or something on Popper later as a counter to the Marx, certainly found his critiques a lot more compelling than Hayek.
Good man, you beat me to it!
Marxists absolutely HATE Popper (so do Fascists).
Popper said the societies go through cycles of anti-intellectualism.
The Marxists are determinists - they see history as always bending in their direction, so the more disruption they can cause the faster they will get to their promised land. To be fair, everyone is a determinist about something, and disagreeing over what is "inevitable" can surely lead to violence.
Popper described this belief in "destiny" or "God's will" as some sort of final destination as a fixture of authoritarianism, either left or right.
Hayek looks more and more foolish as the decades pass because everything for him was a big
slippery slope fallacy. State funded child care meant death camps were right around the corner !
Hayek was a Nobel Prize winning economist who made a complete fool of himself dabbling in sociology and then becoming an intellectual apologist for Pinochet.
Most wingnuts know Hayek from "The Road to Serfdom" as it was condensed by Readers Digest, as well as an anti-union
comic book. But Hayek also wrote a nice political piece titled "Why I Am Not A Conservative."