Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Hydrocarbon Depletion & the Myth of Alternatives

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Fri 27 May 2005, 08:49:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'Y')ou are missing the big picture here. Colin Campbell predicts peak gas for 2012.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Future of Natural Gas Supply, Peak in 30 years

Jean Laherrere, Member of ASPO
This paper contains an enormous amount of data and forecasts of future productions and discoveries of natural gas. You can find data for the world, regions and individual countries ( read more ).


And Laherrere says 2035 :) :P
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 27 May 2005, 09:06:25

I was gonna trot out the old fuel density argument...

But it appears we are threatened by another kind of density altogether.

:)
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby highlander » Fri 27 May 2005, 11:14:07

Fuel Density...Lets see, hydrogen is less dense than LPG, so if it floats Burn it. Burn it Burn it

Just kidding I know, you mean fuel energy density.
This is where everybody puts profound words written by another...or not so profound words written by themselves
Highlander 2007
User avatar
highlander
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State

Unread postby heyhoser » Fri 27 May 2005, 11:45:02

heheheh :lol:
You non-american anti-americans are funny. Not that you're anti-american, just that you don't have a freaking clue as to how your countries are so tediously connected to ours.
I highly recommend you read some of MQ's threads.
We fall, YOU fall! heheheh :lol:
heyhoser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Czech Republic

Unread postby Devilboy » Sat 28 May 2005, 01:53:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('heyhoser', 'h')eheheh :lol:
You non-american anti-americans are funny. Not that you're anti-american, just that you don't have a freaking clue as to how your countries are so tediously connected to ours.
I highly recommend you read some of MQ's threads.
We fall, YOU fall! heheheh :lol:


That may be true to some extent, but the USA has the furthest to fall. Also many countries don't depend much on the US dollar at all, and a crash in the US economy won't make a massive impact in those countries.

And for future reference if you want to be taken seriously don't use SMS shorthand like 'lol'.
User avatar
Devilboy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat 16 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby heyhoser » Sat 28 May 2005, 14:33:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Devilboy', '
')
And for future reference if you want to be taken seriously don't use SMS shorthand like 'lol'.


Derh? Thanks "Devilboy", I will certainly take anything you say about how to be taken seriously into consideration.
LOL
heyhoser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Czech Republic

Unread postby heyhoser » Sat 28 May 2005, 16:33:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Devilboy', '
')That may be true to some extent, but the USA has the furthest to fall. Also many countries don't depend much on the US dollar at all, and a crash in the US economy won't make a massive impact in those countries.


Oh, one more thing. Who you gonna send your exports to? Think man, THINK! :roll: :!:
heyhoser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Czech Republic
Top

Unread postby Devilboy » Sat 28 May 2005, 19:57:33

Many countries do not rely much on exports to the US and others are currently under US sanctions and so exports approximately 0% of their goods to the US.
User avatar
Devilboy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat 16 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 19 Feb 2006, 19:36:14

This thread is mainly for those just becoming aware of the issue and who are new to the site. If any of our site experts catch any numbers that are not quite right, drop me a pm so I can make corrections.

Peak oil means that no matter how much money or technology you throw at an oil well or region, you cannot increase the extraction rate of the oil reservoirs. In other words, from then on, the oil production goes into terminal decline.

The peaking of world oil discovery is not in the future, it is in the past; 1962, to be exact. And since oil production, or extraction, follows discovery, this reality will soon catch up with us. Many of the major oil producing countries have already gone into production decline. The world as a whole, may have, or soon will. We will only know for sure in hindsight. Depending on the data source, we now consume four to six barrels of oil for every one we discover.

In its monthly report for February, the IEA predicted worldwide demand for oil in 2006 would increase by 1.78 million barrels a day. Since total demand is now put at about 85.1 million barrels a day, this equates to about a 2% world oil demand growth rate in 2006. In the US, demand is seen rising by 1.7 percent. China, however, is projected to have an oil product growth rate of 5.8 % in 2006. Link

From what I have read, 60-70% of new projected growth capacity projects coming on-line will be consumed by world depletion alone. We are seeing conservative declines rate projections of 3 to 4% for the world as a whole. Some project it will be much higher.

To quote from Matt Savinar’s site:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Matt Savinar', 'A')ndrew Gould, CEO of the giant oil services firm Schlumberger, for instance, recently explained the global decline rate may be far higher than what Cheney predicted seven years ago:

An accurate average decline rate is hard to estimate, but an overall figure of 8% is not an unreasonable assumption.

An 8% yearly decline would cut global oil production by a whopping 50% in under nine years. If a 5% cut in production caused prices to triple in the 1970s, what do you think a 50% cut is going to do?

To take over for fossil fuels as their production declines, an alternative energy source would have to be cheap and abundant, and the technology to exploit it would have to be mature and capable of being distributed all over the world in what may turn out to be a rather short time. No known energy source meets these requirements. Tar sands are projected to triple to 3 mbpd in 10 years. ANWR will produce 1 mbpd if ever developed, (mostly limited by the Alaskan oil pipeline capacity of 2 mbpd, which currently runs half full with Prudhoe Bay oil.) and that would be 10 years off from the go-ahead to develop.

In a 1999 speech, while still CEO of Halliburton, Dick Cheney stated:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y some estimates, there will be an average of two-percent annual growth in global oil demand over the years ahead, along with, conservatively, a three-percent natural decline in production from existing reserves. That means by 2010 we will need on the order of an additional 50 million barrels a day.

The math here is quite simple.

If we need a 2% growth rate of oil extraction to maintain economic growth to create jobs, service the debt, etc., and we have a 3 to 8% decline rate (even others say 13%) that equates to a 5 to 10% shortfall of oil availability (4.3 to 8.5 mbpd). Tar sands, and other unconventional oil resources or alternative fuels, cannot make up this shortfall. Increases in efficiency and conservation are short-lived measures due to population growth alone and have associated consequences in a capitalistic system: Increased efficiency usually leads to increased consumption and conservation leads to a self-induced recession as economic activity is curtailed. Each year, to continue to be effective, the standard of living would have to decline as the pie (supply) will only get smaller, not bigger.

Meanwhile, the need to service a 87 trillion dollar shortfall in existing debt and unfunded entitlements continues (US alone), along with the demand for jobs, food, clothing, and housing for the expected 3 billion newcomers projected to inhabit the planet by 2050.

From what energy source will they be sustained?

From part of your share of the pie?

No?

I thought so.

Scarcity breeds poverty and poverty breeds conflict.

Geopolitics comes mightily into play.

As Paul Harvey is famous for saying, “stand by for news!”
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby smiley » Thu 23 Feb 2006, 19:23:00

Thanks Monte. I think such a thread is a good idea and a welcome relief from food scarcity, diseases, and environmental threads.

My view on this:

In the past years we have seen the UK, Norway and Mexico reach their peak, and in all probability China has done so last year. This means that at this the moment an estimated 40% of the world's oil production comes from countries which are in decline; which cannot and will not increase their production, ever.

To understand the ramifications of that you can make the following calculations. Let's assume that the percentage stays at 40% for a while. The average decrease in production for the countries in decline is around 2-3% a year.

- In order to keep our oil production at the same level, the countries which are not yet in decline must expand their capacity by a similar percentage (2-3%) on average.

- In order to increase the world production by 1 percent these countries must expand their production by 4-5% a year, on average.

- In order to increase the world production by 2 percent these countries must expand their production by 6-7%, on average.

You don't have to be an oil expert, economist, or a mathematician to understand that these statistics are not very favorable.

And they certainly don't point to a conclusion that we don't have to worry about oil for the next 20 years.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby elroy » Sun 26 Feb 2006, 13:00:59

Something that bugs me is people keep dragging other things into the whole scenario. Aliens, illuminati, second coming of christ, whatever..
Just oil depletion alone will kick us in the ass, no need to invent other bs to add to the panic. Certainly no bs that's wild speculation or blind faith based.
Image
User avatar
elroy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Netherlands

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby grabby » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 16:23:27

Monte is correct, and has einformed us and opened our eyes to peak oil, and it has been very informative, and factual, with lots of proof, about the whole scenario, and I know he understands better than most what is going to happen after the peak. I take his hints sincerely, he takes many things into the equation. The whole thing depends on human reaction to having your money, life, wealth and power diminish.

Of course, what is not so obvious is how humanity will respond to peak oil. Look at history, the response is always conquest. and they gave it all they could, until they could fight no more, today that represents 84,000 megatons. Each one punches a hole in the ozone layer for 6 months about 100 miles in diameter.

This scenario of a winnable world war is no longer possible between the four largest powers in the world, They swill never be conquered or they will never loose a war again.
We entered this new age right after WWII, this has changed everything.The three biggest powers will never take loss of oil or oilfields while they can help it.
The big bear already has threatened W not to get involved in IRAN and we still have oil.

Yes, peak oil would do us in, but it is virtual certainty we will never see a collapse from peak oil, the collapse will probably come quite a few years before real oil deficits ever hit.

Different classes of people behave differently. Downsizing means VOLUNTARILY cutting wealth, for the benefit of the whole? In which decade has this ever happened?

But unfortunately, this lack of co-operation by people themselves kind of puts a crimp in prolonging ourcondition. Basically, people will never tolerate any kind of downsizing at all, it should always come from the other guy and they are usually too happpy to give them theirs.
For example, will you cut your oil use in half and sell your house to move closer to the city so that hate chanting middle easterners screaming for satan's destruction while burning amrikan flags can have some oil to drive their cars? We are all a global community remember? Yah.

I think pigs will fly before then.

Human nature is key to what is about to happen. Most will not be ready because they have been told basically human nature is "good" inside, because that is what they want to believe. We will soon see if this is a right assessment of human nature, because the whole world is about to be put to a rude test.

If you are new on the web site, you should stick to the Oil issue, these other things are out of our control. Don't get upset when you figure out that our society cannot continue like it is and that there are no other real alternatives at this time,. Calculate things our, and rechack them, use a calculator.

Understand British Thermal Units, the measurement of heat, and get a general idea of what it means and how it compares to a gallon of gasoline or diesel. Most people do not know what a "quadrillion Btus" means; indeed most engineers and scientists don't know either.

There is also a lack of understanding about the amount of waste generated in america and how much power we use. "How big is a billion tons? Will it fit in my refrigerator?" And what millions of barrels and billions of Barrels really mean.

This site should open your eyes to a lot of things, enjoy it, but go slow. What you are about to find out will definitely change your outlook on life.


We should hope for the best and plan for the worst.

Now to try and ward off the doomer scenario, just browse this site (I don't own it or know who owns it, it is just a good site.
(http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php? ... norris_024)
I won't make a click to it you can cut and paste, it is only for the die hards in here.

and if you still don't believe it here is a song:

Baby can’t you see
It’s a real dream world
Dream world
You’ve been living in a dream world
Trust me
You just can’t escape from reality
Greed meets reality
Doesn’t mean we’re in a dream world
Here I am, there you are, we gotta make it together
And we’ve made, it so far, so it can only get better
or worse.
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby Concerned » Tue 04 Apr 2006, 00:00:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', '
')
In the past years we have seen the UK, Norway and Mexico reach their peak, and in all probability China has done so last year. This means that at this the moment an estimated 40% of the world's oil production comes from countries which are in decline; which cannot and will not increase their production, ever.


Kuwait's main field is also peaked. Indonesia is no longer an oil exporter and is considering leaving OPEC. Australia I belive has also peaked.

Does anyone know of any others?

I've heard that the Iraq war is damaging the fields possibly limiting the total amount of oil able to be extracted. Could something similar be happening to Nigerian fields?

Saudis are also under a lot of pressure to maintain and increase there production, possibly damaging their fields in the process.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 10 Feb 2007, 23:20:55

As I sit and watch people focusing on tangents, they should be called back to reality by statements such as these:

"Ask anyone who remembers the 1980 crisis…. In 1980 it was a problem in distribution; the oil was there, but it wasn’t getting to the corner gas station. In 2008, the oil won’t be there. The psychological realization that the change is permanent may be as devastating as the shortage itself."
Kenneth S. Deffeyes

Fear and greed drives the market.

Very basic to having a grasp of hydrocarbon depletion. All the alternatives in the world won't matter much in the mad dash for the economics exit door.

If there is no prospect for a long-term assured return, there will be no capital available for anything.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Mon 12 Feb 2007, 06:38:52

If there is no prospect for a long-term assured return, there will be no capital available for anything. This is one the most important points to understand, i don't think it can be raised too many times.
I recently tried pointing it out to a (good) businessman, thinking I was speaking his language, but he just wouldn't accept it. I did spark an interest in the issues in him though, so maybe he'll realize eventually.
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby sch_peakoiler » Sat 17 Feb 2007, 20:19:02

Hi Monte et Al,

One question - you refer to that well know Peak Discoveries diagram. Could you provide me with a non-po-related site with these discovery data. I need it for a talk where it will be strategically unwise to mention PO, it should be a mainstream source

Thanks in advance.
There is no knowledge that is not power.
User avatar
sch_peakoiler
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Sun 15 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 17 Feb 2007, 20:36:57

You want a graph? Or data? EIA will have the data. I have several graphs that show production/ discovery/ demand that don't mention peakoil.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby sch_peakoiler » Mon 19 Feb 2007, 08:34:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'Y')ou want a graph? Or data? EIA will have the data. I have several graphs that show production/ discovery/ demand that don't mention peakoil.

The best would be a graph which resides on a credible website, so that there is no room for questions on that part. Thanks again!
There is no knowledge that is not power.
User avatar
sch_peakoiler
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 555
Joined: Sun 15 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Peakoil and Hydrocarbon Depletion: Back to the Basics

Unread postby Aaron » Mon 19 Feb 2007, 09:20:44

USGS Data: jpg

Exxon 2002: jpg

Campbell: gif

US Army: Graph (Huge)
Last edited by Ferretlover on Sun 26 Jul 2009, 18:52:03, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Converted [img]s to [url]s.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests