Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

American Jobs Act

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby evilgenius » Sun 11 Sep 2011, 13:20:50

First of all, without the corporations and banks there is no economy. That was why GW and Hank Paulson had to start the investment side bailouts which Obama had to continue. Trick is, the bailouts did not have to be done the way they were. They were only done that way because nobody, and I mean nobody, was clever enough at the time to figure out a better way. Stalling was not an option. Bush tried to stall and as a result we came within one weekend of not having working ATMs and bank tellers everywhere hiding behind their bank counters in fear of having to tell one more person there was no money!

That being said, my candidate for how the bailouts should have proceeded beyond the initial stages is to have reformed housing loans immediately. I would have imposed a 4 or 5 percent rate on all real estate loans outstanding. I would have used the bailout money to make up the difference between the new much lower rate and the old high rates. The difference would have been most pronounced in the Sub-Prime category. The banks would have received, for a time, the same monthly payments as the original contracts stipulated. The borrowers would all be paying less. During this holiday I would have begun an inspection of all loans to determine what was going on. Those who could pay, but only at a much lower rate would get refinanced to a lower rate. The banks would have to take the hit. Those who were paying usurious rates, but who could somehow afford them, would be refinanced to the highest rate deemed not to be usurious. Again, the banks would have to take the hit. Those who had no business receiving a loan would default. Yet again the banks would take the hit, only this time within the repossession system which when not overwhelmed makes a good firestop. When the period was done those who had good loans would simply go back to their old loan structures. Those people would not have that extra money to spend each month anymore, but neither would they be in an impossible position.

This is something like what Obama is proposing insofar as housing is considered. He is still not willing to include everyone. At this point, also, doing this would come too late to stem losses that have now occurred. The horse has bolted from the barn as they say.

I also have to bring something up which I know sounds racist, but is actually an economic point. There needs to be a citizenship mandate issued to all contractors working on stimulus projects. It does no good to simply give contracts out to the lowest bidder. They have to go to the lowest bidder that hires only American citizens. If they don't do something like that then the pay issued to the workers on those jobs will flood to Mexico and other places south of the border. It will not stay in the local economies where it is needed to provide stimulus. I know this stipulation would still not do anything about keeping money from flowing from one region to another, workers could still live in one part of the country and only temporarily migrate to another part thus sending most of what they earn from a region where a project has been issued for reasons of necessary stimulus to a region where stimulus is maybe not so necessary. At least this way stimulus money would remain within the greater US economy. Alternatively, we could keep the labor situation the same and tax relevant money transfers to foreign countries so significantly so as to provide an extreme disincentive to shuffle money from local economies to other places.

Last, for now, the US corporate tax rate should be lowered to 15%. Do you people realize that because of off-shoring most big companies pay zero? Can you see why the big derivatives bubble has to be kept afloat with so much corporate money needing to travel to so many tax havens off-shore? Take away the high corporate tax rates which provide such an incentive to off-shore at the same time as you constrict the derivatives slush that enables such easy wealth transfer and maybe the government has more income to pay for what it needs to without anything else needing to be done, aye! Institute an alternative minimum corporate tax which includes off-shored money in order to catch cheats. Don't overdo it. Don't cause corporations to fail because of revenge. Don't underdo it either. Also, increase personal income tax for anyone making more than 5 million a year to 90%. Keep the rates the same as they are now below 5 million a year.

Greater systemic reform than this is necessary. This is enough, for this forum space, to digest for now.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 11 Sep 2011, 13:36:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('beamofthewave', 'I')t is not a Ponzi scheme. The scheme is the constant welfare to the corporations and the banks and I am sick of it. The mooch class has got to go!

I'm just wondering, what is the source of the "mooch class" talking point?
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby peeker01 » Sun 11 Sep 2011, 14:11:41

One of the more powerful and successful businesses in the world is insurance. Life, property, even
health. How do they do it year after year? They invest the premiums. Of course the last few
years have been rough for everybody, the principle is still sound.

That's why Social Security is in trouble, at least partly. It's hand to mouth now, because the fund
has been raided by government. Payroll taxes are being used to pay benefits, rather than making
investments. This is the exact definition of a Ponzi Scheme. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
The FAA used to have a huge trust fund. It has also been raided into the general fund.

The government must streamline and work smarter.
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sun 11 Sep 2011, 14:12:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'A')lso, increase personal income tax for anyone making more than 5 million a year to 90%. Keep the rates the same as they are now below 5 million a year.


This is kinda what I mean by yall not understanding how income tax is completely the ball game of the rich.

The rich person would simply set his income at 4.9 million, and keep living EXACTLY the same way he is living now. EXACTLY.
Would his employees get more money? No.
Would he expand plant and equipment? No.
The only thing that would happen is that the amount of dollars available for after tax purposes would go down.

Basically, the government would get less in taxes (wouldn't be getting the 20% of the (5.01mil - 15 mil) they were getting before, and there would be less money in the unrestricted investment and consumption category of the economy.

Its why the income tax is tiered the way it is, you *WANT* the rich guy to take the fresh 100 mil or whatever he controls each year, declare it as personal income, and tax it, if you insist on taxing income at all. The tiering needs to be that each step up the ladder has to represent a step the guy wants to take; if he gets more quality of life improvement simply by leaving the cash on the company's balance sheet or setting the headquarters office building A/C to 70; then that's where he'll direct it; and it'll either end up being expensed or at worse it becoming subject to corporate income tax which is a *huge* mess if you think you can get a huge tier step to work without causing armeggedon scale offshoring.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 11 Sep 2011, 14:26:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('beamofthewave', 'I')t is not a Ponzi scheme. The scheme is the constant welfare to the corporations and the banks and I am sick of it. The mooch class has got to go!

I'm just wondering, what is the source of the "mooch class" talking point?


Well, a mooch is someone of substantial means that hides their wealth in order to get hand-outs. That could apply to corporations these days as they are now persons.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 12 Sep 2011, 04:00:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', 'T')he one-person one-vote concept has a lot of emotional appeal. But it's failed. Time to try something else, even if it's a variation on something that's been done before.


What would you like to try, Ex? Royalty again? Or do you want dictatorship? If it's the latter, I guess you have a right wing dictator in mind eh?

Thanks but no thanks, I like the US Constitution.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 12 Sep 2011, 16:29:54

The polls are out following Obama's "Jobs" campaign speech.

Gallup has Obama's approval rating going down another 2 points.

Image
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: American Jobs Act

Unread postby evilgenius » Tue 13 Sep 2011, 11:35:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'A')lso, increase personal income tax for anyone making more than 5 million a year to 90%. Keep the rates the same as they are now below 5 million a year.


This is kinda what I mean by yall not understanding how income tax is completely the ball game of the rich.

The rich person would simply set his income at 4.9 million, and keep living EXACTLY the same way he is living now. EXACTLY.
Would his employees get more money? No.
Would he expand plant and equipment? No.
The only thing that would happen is that the amount of dollars available for after tax purposes would go down.

Basically, the government would get less in taxes (wouldn't be getting the 20% of the (5.01mil - 15 mil) they were getting before, and there would be less money in the unrestricted investment and consumption category of the economy.

Its why the income tax is tiered the way it is, you *WANT* the rich guy to take the fresh 100 mil or whatever he controls each year, declare it as personal income, and tax it, if you insist on taxing income at all. The tiering needs to be that each step up the ladder has to represent a step the guy wants to take; if he gets more quality of life improvement simply by leaving the cash on the company's balance sheet or setting the headquarters office building A/C to 70; then that's where he'll direct it; and it'll either end up being expensed or at worse it becoming subject to corporate income tax which is a *huge* mess if you think you can get a huge tier step to work without causing armeggedon scale offshoring.


I framed my post with the idea that there was more to it. Taxes at a high level above a certain income level have a direct influence on executive compensation. Policies related to reining in executive compensation levels, such that executives at poorly performing companies, for instance, don't sack the store, will have to emerge. They will have to do what they do in concert with a host of other policies, each doing their own part. The idea is not to kill initiative, but the lie that the kind of egregious robbery committed against shareholders during boom times is indicative of some kind of proper reward system.

In the end people do work at a high level because they find reward in it that is not monetary. They find that what they do appeals to them on a deep level and gives them rewards that money only imitates. While it is true that with more money you can get a person to sack more potatoes per hour, it is not true that with more money you can make a person put out more creative output. That only comes with things like artistic freedom, exposure to more influences, better management, etc.

Yeah, sure, the ultra-rich will always be able to live off of trust funds and other legal entities that make all of their money for them and provide for their lavish lifestyles, while allowing them to declare very little income. Executives of corporations, however, have a short time to rob the candy store, so they had better rig the system now. It is society's job to stop them because the trainwreck they make of companies in the process, by tweaking EPS for instance to favor bonus conditions while choking future investment, weakens that communal resource. That kind of weakening can be dangerous for us all. Look at what it did to the atmosphere that loan officers operated in during the years before the housing peak!
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.
Top

Previous

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest