Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby efarmer » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 11:43:36

Moody's and S&P and the lot of them gamed and shamed themselves for years.
This whole recent farce is akin to giving Chicken Little a big shot of Sodium Pentathol and
analyzing every piece of nonsense that flows from his little beak.

When you make value from illusions and shell games, it becomes hard to find real
value when you need some again.

The grifters of New York and Washington as usual have run the nation wealth extraction
pump until the motor burnt out and now they want to show their innocence and stellar
procedural mastery. They couldn't piss a drop of integrity if you held a gun on them
and let the faucet run so they would get in the mood to tinkle...
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby Pops » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 12:07:17

I certainly can't work up any sympathy for a company who was paid by the banks to evaluate the bank's worthless "instruments" and said those 'assets' were actually worth something.

It makes me mad the originators of the counterfeit paper themselves (the banks that dreamed up the tranches) aren't broke and in jail, along with the title companies and appraisers and mortgage originators. It was all a big scam.


But really, who in their right mind - with any money to invest anyway - thinks that there is a safer investment than US bonds? Seriously?

If the US goes tits-up, the only safe investment is gonna require hearing protection.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby AgentR11 » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 13:30:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I')t makes me mad the originators of the counterfeit paper themselves (the banks that dreamed up the tranches) aren't broke and in jail, along with the title companies and appraisers and mortgage originators. It was all a big scam.


As long as your fair about it, and also include the politicians who belabored the "red-lining" argument and insisted on creating a sub-prime mortgage market...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut really, who in their right mind - with any money to invest anyway - thinks that there is a safer investment than US bonds? Seriously?


If you want and need dollars in your business or personal life; its a really hard instrument to beat no matter what any rating agency might say.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 16:45:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') certainly can't work up any sympathy for a company who was paid by the banks to evaluate the bank's worthless "instruments" and said those 'assets' were actually worth something.


Do you see the point though, that this time they swung the other direction and a made a bearish call and wound up punished worse than the pollyanna subprime ratings. Look at what being honest and doing a downgrade has cost S&P:

1) Lost clients.. surprise surprise, clients want good ratings or they'll take their business elsewhere :lol:

2) Obama Admin openly hostile to them

3) Justice Dept. investigation

4) Somebody very powerful complained to the Board, got the CEO fired

I'm not saying feel sorry for S&P, rather be concerned our financial system has no watchdog. There is no "bondzilla," Treasury can't ever have a bad auction as long as the Fed is willing to print cash and buy bonds. Stock market is pumped up with QE cash. The whole system is rigged, it's not an honest market anymore with balanced market forces at play. That's not sustainable, a rigged market must eventually collapse, it's a natural law. There is no Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy, intimidating, punishing, busting up S&P doesn't make us a AAA country again.

Actually, there really needs to be some congressional hearings to investigate whether the Obama admin or his campaign had any part in firing the CEO. This isn't cool from a free speech perspective, the executive branch cracking down on a private entity that said something the government didn't like.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 17:14:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') certainly can't work up any sympathy for a company who was paid by the banks to evaluate the bank's worthless "instruments" and said those 'assets' were actually worth something.


Do you see the point though, that this time they swung the other direction and a made a bearish call and wound up punished worse than the pollyanna subprime ratings. Look at what being honest and doing a downgrade has cost S&P:

Ech, well...
US works just like yet another one collapsing Stalinist state.
Reality don't matter if it doesn't fit government lies... :-D
More fun to come soon on Invincible Empire ---> Banana Republic transformation pathway...
And shares + gold will go up and down like prostitute panties... but finally shares will go down and Treasuries yield + gold up. :-D :-D :-D

Uncle Sam is a bankrupt pimp.
Hahaha :-D :-D :-D
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 20:57:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'Y')eah, don't actually fix the problem. Don't have regulations that ensure enough competition, or competent oversight of the ratings agencies.

Just "own" the agencies, and use threats and intimidation if they have the nerve to tell the truth. And of course, scream at them when they screw up -- that way the public may pay less attention to the idiots on Capitol Hill screwing up. :lol:
).

are you serious? after '08, how can you suggest that S&P (or any ratings agency) is in any way, shape, or form 'competent'? that very assertion tells me you have no idea whatsoever what the hay is going on, and completely explains the tea-party flavored, libertarian-blather you're posting.


You know, if you were careful enough to read and UNDERSTAND what someone posts, then your vitriolic spew might have a BIT of credibility.

As it is, you have zero, so telling people they don't know what is going on does SO much good. Try looking in a mirror, repeating that several times, then reading more carefully.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', '
')you don't want to stop the madness; you want to remove all barriers (however flimsy) preventing the madhouse from descending into a sheer industrial hell many times worse.

As I highlighted in red for you, I am pointing out that the GOVERNMENT is not competent at regulating such entities. Pick pretty much any government agency. Then look what happens whenever there is a crisis. In almost ALL cases, either the regulators (the SEC and the FDA and the EPA have been in the news and on CSPAN for massive incompetence or corruption over recent problems such as Madoff, the BP spill, various e-coli outbreaks, etc) do basically NOTHING expect fill out reports on industry self-monitoring, or worse, they are corrupt and inept, like the SEC. At the end of the day, it's all the same. Government failure, with cheerleaders like you yelling for more government to "fix things".

Then, because your leftist brain is so frightened of anyone critical of big government, incompetently (or dishonestly - I can't tell which) completely misinterpret what they say so you angrily accuse them of something they didn't even assert.

VERY impressive. :roll:

All I'm saying is I either want competent, cost effective government -- or I want it to get OUT OF THE WAY. Shrilly mispresenting people changes nothing. What are you leftists so afraid of?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby nobodypanic » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 21:01:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') certainly can't work up any sympathy for a company who was paid by the banks to evaluate the bank's worthless "instruments" and said those 'assets' were actually worth something.


Do you see the point though, that this time they swung the other direction and a made a bearish call and wound up punished worse than the pollyanna subprime ratings. Look at what being honest and doing a downgrade has cost S&P:

1) Lost clients.. surprise surprise, clients want good ratings or they'll take their business elsewhere :lol:

2) Obama Admin openly hostile to them

3) Justice Dept. investigation

4) Somebody very powerful complained to the Board, got the CEO fired

I'm not saying feel sorry for S&P, rather be concerned our financial system has no watchdog. There is no "bondzilla," Treasury can't ever have a bad auction as long as the Fed is willing to print cash and buy bonds. Stock market is pumped up with QE cash. The whole system is rigged, it's not an honest market anymore with balanced market forces at play. That's not sustainable, a rigged market must eventually collapse, it's a natural law. There is no Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy, intimidating, punishing, busting up S&P doesn't make us a AAA country again.

Actually, there really needs to be some congressional hearings to investigate whether the Obama admin or his campaign had any part in firing the CEO. This isn't cool from a free speech perspective, the executive branch cracking down on a private entity that said something the government didn't like.

actually, not only will a 'rigged' market buy you some time, but it is a signal that the capitalist economic system has hit a wall and is in a state of prolonged crisis.

not sure if this hasn't already been covered but... whereas at one time the ratings agency's business model was one where investors would pay to get the rating of various organizations (subscriber based), now it's one where the organization they are rating pays them for that rating (issuer based) and the public gets it for free. the conflict of interest is obvious.

also, i am fairly sure that the investigation into S&P was initiated some time ago. why isn't anyone hypothesizing that maybe S&P was trying to intimidate the US? after all, i think these sorts of organizations may be starting to feel their oats, since the future seems to indicate that the nation-state as we have known it may be on the way out in favor of international capital concerns.

btw, japan just had its credit rating cut; so, really, it's almost a question of who isn't broke and where is the relatively safest port? i agree w/pops: it's obviously here in the US. so rate accordingly.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby nobodypanic » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 21:06:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'Y')eah, don't actually fix the problem. Don't have regulations that ensure enough competition, or competent oversight of the ratings agencies.

Just "own" the agencies, and use threats and intimidation if they have the nerve to tell the truth. And of course, scream at them when they screw up -- that way the public may pay less attention to the idiots on Capitol Hill screwing up. :lol:
).

are you serious? after '08, how can you suggest that S&P (or any ratings agency) is in any way, shape, or form 'competent'? that very assertion tells me you have no idea whatsoever what the hay is going on, and completely explains the tea-party flavored, libertarian-blather you're posting.


You know, if you were careful enough to read and UNDERSTAND what someone posts, then your vitriolic spew might have a BIT of credibility.

As it is, you have zero, so telling people they don't know what is going on does SO much good. Try looking in a mirror, repeating that several times, then reading more carefully.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', '
')you don't want to stop the madness; you want to remove all barriers (however flimsy) preventing the madhouse from descending into a sheer industrial hell many times worse.

As I highlighted in red for you, I am pointing out that the GOVERNMENT is not competent at regulating such entities. Pick pretty much any government agency. Then look what happens whenever there is a crisis. In almost ALL cases, either the regulators (the SEC and the FDA and the EPA have been in the news and on CSPAN for massive incompetence or corruption over recent problems such as Madoff, the BP spill, various e-coli outbreaks, etc) do basically NOTHING expect fill out reports on industry self-monitoring, or worse, they are corrupt and inept, like the SEC. At the end of the day, it's all the same. Government failure, with cheerleaders like you yelling for more government to "fix things".

Then, because your leftist brain is so frightened of anyone critical of big government, incompetently (or dishonestly - I can't tell which) completely misinterpret what they say so you angrily accuse them of something they didn't even assert.

VERY impressive. :roll:

All I'm saying is I either want competent, cost effective government -- or I want it to get OUT OF THE WAY. Shrilly mispresenting people changes nothing. What are you leftists so afraid of?

yeah i got that. like i said, the solution involves removing the last of the barriers (however imperfect and flimsy; and they are!) preventing the lunatics from completely running the asylum w/out any hinderance whatsoever.
User avatar
nobodypanic
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 24 Aug 2011, 23:47:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nobodypanic', 'n')ow it's one where the organization they are rating pays them for that rating (issuer based) and the public gets it for free. the conflict of interest is obvious.


Ultimately I think the S&P shakeup has more to do with losing clients than direct pressure from the Obama admin (although Gheitner and all these guys are so closely connected that must be a factor too). But losing clients is the main thing; before the CEO firing, news came out about California municipalities firing S&P because they got a downgrade.

So yeah, American ratings agencies rating American financial products just doesn't work. S&P is fine for rating debt *over there* but they can't say anything bad here or the client fires them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.').also, i am fairly sure that the investigation into S&P was initiated some time ago. why isn't anyone hypothesizing that maybe S&P was trying to intimidate the US?


Intimidate the US into doing what, getting a handle on its budget problems? Gee, wouldn't that be a good thing? As for the investigation, please, there's a whole lot on Wall Street that needs investigated before S&P. :roll: It's way too coincidental that the Justice dept announces the investigation *after* the downgrade.

The whole Wall Street / bankster cabal is corrupt, and they own the politicians of both parties. Wall Street is in bed with the government now, neither S&P nor anyone will be allowed to cross them.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Justice Dept. investigating S&P

Unread postby Pops » Fri 26 Aug 2011, 17:47:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') certainly can't work up any sympathy for a company ...


Do you see the point though, that this time they swung the other direction and a made a bearish call and wound up punished worse than the pollyanna subprime ratings.

It says right there in the second para of the story that the investigation started before the downgrade.

Nobodypanic has a good take, perhaps since .gov was already investigating perhaps S&P was the one doing the threatening...

---
@AR11
Redlining...

Being discriminating about who you make loans to on the is just good business and stupid loans simply didn't happen at the few old fashioned banks who still carry their own paper. But in the case of the sub-primes, outfits like Countrywide used Reverse Discrimination to target people who had no place getting a loan, that had nothing to do with lefties. Those vulture loan brokers made their mark-up and ran a million loans through the food processor just so the could sell them - rated AAA of course, on down the line.

I do take your point however that it is hard to find the right balance when redressing past wrongs.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron