by Oakley » Sun 21 Aug 2011, 23:33:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('prajeshbhat', '
')
I think money has been around for so long people have forgotten what money really is. Money is a promise that has to be fulfilled in the future. I hear a lot of fascinating definitions of money. Medium of exchange, store of value, claim on labor, unit of accounting. These are the derived uses of money that developed over the millennia. Money fundamentally is a promise. And that is why money only works in a growing system. Because only in a growing system, there is a good chance that both parties will believe that a promise will be fulfilled.
Credit is money And that is why it is accepted so easily in circulation. Because as long as the system is growing, there is a good chance that credit will get you something valuable in future.
Don't believe me? Go deep in to the jungles of Africa and ask the tribals if they will exchange their food in return of gold (medium of exchange). If there is a worldwide famine( shrinking system), what will happen to the price of food with respect to gold(no inflation with gold standard).
I was trying to counter Oakley's assertion that money and freedom can coexist. To me the tribals in Africa are truly free. They don't make promises and they don't owe anybody anything. The "civilized" on the other hand......
The use of gold and silver as money arose out of barter. People do benefit from trade because it allows some to acquire from others what they cannot directly acquire from nature, but which others can. I might be a good hunter and you a good farmer and we can exchange directly, through barter. Gold and silver were found or mined by some and they used it themselves for whatever they pleased or traded it to others who could use it for some purpose that was of value to them. Somewhere along the line, it was discovered it was convenient to accept it in trade even if you didn't want it to use, because it was easy to pass on part or all of it to someone else who for something you actually wanted.
Gold and silver were first usable commodities in their own right before they acquired additional value as a medium of exchange. It is not a promise because the one who gives it in trade or receives it in trade promises nothing. The ones who mine it or mint it promise nothing. A promise is an obligation, but gold and silver coins are not obligations of anyone. The value of the coins may go up or down in relationship to goods and services and they retain only what value the mutual judgement of people making trades are willing to assign to them. If the output of the economy increases because there is more efficiency in production, perhaps because of energy discoveries then the value of the existing gold and silver coins increase relative to the value of the increased production (things cost less). If the output of the economy decreases because there is less production, perhaps because of less available energy, then the value of the gold and silver coins in existence goes down relative to the available supply of goods and services (things cost more). Of course there are other factors which influence the value of gold and silver coins such as mining of new gold and silver which increases the supply, but since mining requires considerable resources, the increase will be slow. Gold and silver work just fine in either a growing or a contracting system; their value in trade just adjusts in the market place.
Your remark about "no inflation with gold standard" confuses inflation, increases in the money supply, with price increases. Prices increases can be caused by increased in the money supply that exceed increases in production. If there is a famine and food prices increase, but the money supply stays stable, there is no inflation but there is a price change because the supply of food dramatically dropped. Inflation and deflation are monetary terms which refer to the increase or decrease in the supply of money.
Gold and silver coins as money involves no promise. But if someone issues bills of credit, or scrip which were pieces of paper that promised to give gold or silver coins at some future date or on demand, then they have issued money that does involve a promise. If someone accepts gold and silver coins for safekeeping in their vault, and issues a certificate (warehouse receipt) like silver and gold certificates that circulated as money then these certificates are promises to turn over the gold or silver coins on demand.
The current money supply in the US, if you use the M2 definition is composed of currency in circulation, checking accounts, savings accounts, CD's and travelers checks in circulation. All these are bank credit and redeemable at the banks in nothing other than a different form of bank credit. If you want currency (debts of the Federal Reserve Bank) instead of a checking account balance (debt of your local bank) you cash a check, but you can't get anything else from the bank, hence the current promises of the banks are in reality promises that cannot be redeemed. And this bank credit was created out of thin air and loaned to the public at interest with the purpose of indenturing (enslaving) the public to the banks. The side effect was first boom and then bust as each cycle of expansion was driven by the demand expressed in spending the newly created money and then the lack of demand as repayment of the debts to the banks caused contraction. This is why the current debt based monetary system is predatory, unstable and unsustainable, and is inconsistent with freedom. Free people are those who have not been captured by indenture agreements issued by governments to banks on behalf of the public (government bonds) when the banks gave nothing in return but their own promise to pay nothing (M2 money supply).
Gold and silver coins are not instruments of slavery. In any society that trades on a large enough scale to need a medium of exchange, gold and silver are neutral and favor neither the buyer or seller of goods and services. They are not promises; they are commodities.
Your assertion that gold and silver are promises I see as incorrect. You assertion that gold and silver only work in an expanding economy I see as incorrect. You assertion that money and freedom cannot coexist I see as incorrect if that money is gold and silver coinage. You assertion that money and freedom cannot coexist is correct if that money is fiat, scrip, real bills, bills of credit, or any other bank credit without 100% gold and silver coinage as reserves against the banks deposit liabilities.