by babystrangeloop » Fri 12 Aug 2011, 09:22:58
Another paper from Johns Hopkins U in Baltimore, MD this year.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]
PEAK PETROLEUM AND PUBLIC HEALTHPeak Oil and Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Impacts and Potential Responses
Peter Winch, MD, MPH, and and Rebecca Stepnitz, MHS
AJPH First Look, published online ahead of print Jul 21, 2011
Peter Winch is with the Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Rebecca Stepnitz is with the Center for Injury Research & Policy, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Correspondence: Correspondence should be sent to Peter Winch, MD, MPH, Professor and Director, Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Associate Chair, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Room E5533, 615 North Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103 (e-mail: pwinch{at}jhsph.edu). Reprints can be ordered at
http://www.ajph.org by clicking the "Reprints/Eprints" link.
Peak oil refers to the predicted peak and subsequent decline in global production of petroleum products over the coming decades. We describe how peak oil will affect health, nutrition, and health systems in low- and middle-income countries along 5 pathways.
The negative effects of peak oil on health and nutrition will be felt most acutely in the 58 low-income countries experiencing minimal or negative economic growth because of their patterns of sociopolitical, geographic, and economic vulnerability.
The global health community needs to take additional steps to build resilience among the residents of low- and middle-income countries and maintain access to maternal and other health services in the face of predicted changes in availability and price of fossil fuels.
Another blog article to go with it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]
Running on empty?by Michael Anft / Johns Hopkins Magazine / February 28, 2011
If you believe academics who practice the science of public health, the work of people like them is responsible for increasing the world’s population from around 500 million, where it had been stuck for centuries following the plagues of the Middle Ages, to 7 billion today. Proponents of this thinking, including Alfred Sommer, a storied professor and senior associate dean at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, point to the field’s many breakthroughs in containing diseases and providing food, clean water, antibiotics, and vitamin regimens to even the poorest people around the world. Emphasis on improving health care access, hygiene, and prevention, so the thinking goes, explains modern humanity’s dominion over the planet. ...
... In an article to be published later this year in the
American Journal of Public Health, Peter Winch, SPH ’88, a professor of social and behavioral sciences at the Bloomberg School, warns that the gains made by public health in the past century may slowly be rolled back as oil becomes progressively more scarce and expensive. What’s more, as the nations of the world increasingly scrape for petroleum, scientists who believe that saving lives is worth any amount of available grant money may have to change their thinking.
“A lot of people believe that our basic M.O. will stay the same,” says Winch. “But there’s no way it will. We have to recalibrate what we’re doing in the field. Just getting people thinking about what will happen when oil is scarce is a challenge.” He sees the energy issue as one that decision makers in public health should take more seriously, as they already do in regard to climate change and degradation of the environment. “The way public health uses liquid energy is part of a problem that threatens to increase mortality,” Winch says, arguing that using energy as in the past will contribute to future shortages that may affect the nutritional health of people in poor countries. “We should be working to prevent such a sudden threat, which means we should stop relying so heavily on a resource that is becoming rapidly depleted,” he says.
Winch recommends that public health hospitals and research stations in poor countries reinstitute low-energy natural ventilation systems and reintroduce surgical supplies that can be easily sterilized and reused. He says foreign aid organizations and universities should factor in dwindling amounts of fuel when planning public health interventions and reduce their reliance on air travel. He says that some programs, such as ones that work to minimize threats to a birthing mother’s health, should more often be constructed so that local people can run and maintain them using less energy.
... Although Winch doesn’t foresee mass die-offs from a shortage of fossil fuel, he says the results will be devastating over the longer term. “What we might experience is analogous to what we’ve seen from HIV/AIDS in Africa,” He says. “We’re more likely to see life expectancies diminish. People will start dying younger.”
Winch’s paper will be published in a special peak oil supplement of the
American Journal of Public Health, to be edited by another Bloomberg professor, Brian Schwartz, and assistant professor Cindy Parker. Schwartz says the fallout from the emergence of peak oil won’t be limited to the bottom billion. “We’ll see recessions that come from oil price shocks, to be followed by growth. Then, the price of oil will go up because of increased demand, and the process will repeat itself. What happens during recessions? Politicians cut budgets, which would lead to fewer clinics and vaccinations. Public health will suffer even in wealthier nations.”