Ratigan in his great rant when asked to come up with solutions offered the infrastructure bank with 2% lending financed by repatriated off shore money. I thought I would elaborate on this as this is a little talked subject that is worthy of discussion.
We have wealthy Americans who have put billions if not trillions off shore. This problem is exasperated because America is the only industrialized country that taxes its citizens on foreign earned income. In addition because of the homeland security laws US residents and citizens who send funds from overseas into the US have to declare the source of the funds. Also there are huge penalties to US taxpayers who fail to declare foreign bank accounts or fail to disclose if they are share holders of foreign owned corporations. No other industrialized country on the planet controls its citizens foreign owned assets like the US government.
Ratigan is basically proposing reversing the extraction of American wealth by creating incentives on repatriating off shore money.
I will now switch to an anecdotal example recently that I experienced from Panama. A lot of wealthy Panamanians, many of them Chinese, are currently purchasing foreclosed homes in California and Florida. Recently I met a group of Chinese who were traveling to the US to purchase homes in Florida that a local real estate agent in Florida had prepared them to see.
As foreign citizens and non residents of the US, these Chinese would be able to send any amount of funds from Panama into the US to purchase foreclosed homes. A US citizen or resident on the other hand, who would send funds from over seas for the same purpose, would fall under homeland security and us tax laws where they would have to disclose the source of their funds. If they were not declared in a previous income tax statement huge penalties would be applied.
Panama is the Dubai of the Americas as a trading center and is well known as an off shore haven. The truth is today offshore funds from Panama, owned by foreign nationals, are being used to purchase foreclosed homes in the US.
Imagine the contribution to the housing problem if Americans were given a tax amnesty on their foreign assets if they were repatriated in order to
1) buy foreclosed properties
2) fund an infrastructure bank as Ratigan proposed.
3) Invest in renewable energy venture capitol
4) etc. etc. etc.
There really is so much our government could do to break the polarity and promote policies that would benefit the country as the example above. I use this particular example as it is party neutral as I can assure you all that both wealthy democrats and republicans about equally have squirreled away funds off shore.
I would add that this topic is one often discussed amongst ex pats living over seas. There was a recent NY Times article that highlighted this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/us/26expat.html Because of these US draconian tax laws, more and more expats are even going to the extreme of renouncing their US citizenship. How many of them would instead re invest in America if a tax amnesty was granted? Or if the US stopped taxing US citizens on their foreign owned income.
Many would argue why give them tax amnesty on repatriated funds from overseas since these investments were illegal?
What position would you take?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com