by Pops » Tue 12 Jul 2011, 19:27:02
Yep, the only things the 'pubs wanted was votes, it's all about party over people:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')cConnell's proposal would require Obama to request three increases in the debt limit, in installments through next summer, in order to get past the November 2012 election.
Each time, it would be subject to a congressional vote of disapproval. That likely would happen, mostly with Republican votes, forcing Obama to veto it. Congress then would fail to override his veto if one-third of the members of either house -- Democrats, presumably -- voted to uphold it.
Obama also would be required to submit a list of proposed spending cuts at least equal to the amount of the debt limit increase -- a reference to House Speaker John Boehner's insistence on a dollar-for-dollar ratio. But the list would be just that -- it would not produce legislation reducing the deficit.
The result: No default, but no deficit reduction -- and a political hot potato for Democrats.
I'm not sure the 'pubs will get away with pulling a sorta-Gingrich though, even old Newt had the cajones to follow through whether you agree or not. I mean the TEAs showed they want to kill old folks benefits - actually all social programs in order that the rich get to keep their jet write-offs because as we all know ture patriots don't partake of Uncle Sugar's largesse. But aside from making sure Bush's payoff to the 1% was extended, what did they accomplish really?
They didn't kick any of the freeloaders off welfare or the Mescns out of the country either, there's still gays in the military and men marrying men in NYC and not all folks speak 'merican 100% of the time and there's still an African Muslim in the White House for cripes sake!
What did they actually acomplish for the true patriots?
Kinda makes you wonder if they actually believe the bile they spit or if it is too nasty even for them.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)