by Expatriot » Fri 22 Jul 2011, 20:57:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TreeFarmer', 'I')t is time to become a libertarian if you value any freedom at all.
Well it sounds good in principle, but . . . . it has always been the refuge of people who are trying to repackage feudlism or the plantation system, which makes it the favorite of senile aristocrats.
This argument fails before it even gets legs.
Most obviously, rich people are almost unanimously not libertarian.
Next obviously, everybody I know who is a libertarian is not wealthy.
Finally, libertarians generally are unified by the concept that government should be kept as small as possible. Virtually every other theory of government differs from libertarianism in that they squabble about how it is the government should be controlling the people through laws.
You, quite obviously, and quite simply, just don't like the concept of limited government.
But rather than simply say, "I don't like libertarianism because, from my perspective, it is the proper role of government to pass laws to accomplish the following . . . " and then fill in your brand of that side of the spectrum, you go on about you don't quite understand it.
Here it is, simplified for you. Keep government as small as possible and taxes as low as possible. Have as few laws as possible to keep order. Let people do what they want without hurting others, and hold them responsible for the results. Pretty simple, really, and probably a lot better defined that amorphous concepts like Fascism and Liberalism, which know no bounds.
Republican war mongering, liberal welfaring, whatever.
I've noted over the years that the right wingers and left wingers and the rich and the poor all hate libertarianism equivalently.