Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

Unread postby Beery » Wed 04 May 2011, 12:41:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'A')nd now, Obama will campaign on the OBL victory when in fact that victory would not be possible without waterboarding intelligence.


LOL. Yeah, that waterboarding intel was REALLY effective. Luckily, because no one actually knows what intel waterboarding was actually used to get, it can be dragged up by neocons whenever the US gets a victory anywhere. Heck, without waterboarding, we wouldn't have got Bin Laden, ice cream wouldn't taste so great, and the iPhone and Amazon Kindle could never have been invented! Waterboarding is so great!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think we both know that if the GOP win 2012, moveon.org will suddenly get all anti-war again.


Moveon.org can do what it likes. Hypocrisy is hardly confined to the political left. Anyway, I've been against every war since 1962, whether it's been started by Republican or Democrat.
Beery
 

Re: The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

Unread postby evilgenius » Wed 04 May 2011, 12:44:43

Didn't the left run smack dab into the export land model? With the economy as bad as it is, and the people still so unwilling to take the blame for the portion of it that is their fault, the left has nowhere to go with anti-war sentiment. 8O We now have so many fewer choices. We can complain about this and that, but it doesn't get to the real point. There is only so much oil left and we simply cannot have those Arabs using it for themselves rather than selling it to us for a price.

As long as the rebellion in Libya remains simmering militarily the people there will not be able to consume their own oil, especially not at an ever increasing rate. Same goes for Bahrain and Kuwait. Yemen and Syria are different stories. Stable democracies in those countries that sought after exercising some kind of claim on 'Arab' oil before it had a chance to be sold on the open market would be a bad example indeed.
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

Unread postby Vogelzang » Tue 17 May 2011, 18:05:54

Its all a communist plot.

Image
User avatar
Vogelzang
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

Unread postby Fishman » Tue 17 May 2011, 21:14:21

"grown as tired and jaded as the rest of us."
LOL
Amazing how that fatigue and jadedness timed so precisesely with Obama's election. Surely they could have stirred up a few mass riots, destroying property, picketing Obama's home or something when we went into Libya. I feel so sorry for those poor "tired and jaded" justice seekers. Perhaps the DNC didn't pay as well now that Os in office.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: The hypocrisy of the anti-war movement

Unread postby NoWorries » Tue 17 May 2011, 21:40:55

It's because the "anti-war movement" was more about demonizing the Republicans than it was about stopping the war(s).

Same as the "feminists" who cheered Hillary because "we need a woman in the White House", but then promptly turned around and booed Palin when she entered the race.

Or the "cultural feminists" who demonize Christian conservatives (and GW Bush) but give radical Islamists (who treat women like chattel) a free pass.

I could go on, but you get the general idea.

Sadly, it's all about politics.

It was ever thus.
User avatar
NoWorries
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron