by mos6507 » Sun 17 Apr 2011, 01:30:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', '
')I'll admit I know very little about telecommuting, but it strikes me as being limited to jobs that will be redundant as the economy continues to spiral downwards. It also doesn't apply to any hands-on jobs. My uncle is an elevator mechanic for example----can't exactly do that from home. I work on a farm---can't plant tomatoes or harvest chives via the internet.
That's a thought I have as well. Telecommuting seems to me to be a bridging strategy but will reach a point of diminishing returns. I wish I knew how long something like that could be made workable, because I keep reading stuff about a sea change in corporate policies regarding telecommuting and I'm starting to experience this at my own job. I'm so paranoid about my own job security that I haven't worked from home nearly as much as I probably could, but that will change when oil goes over $4/gallon in MA. I mean, at some point I need to start using that perk. But then again, my job probably will be eliminated if gas stays at this level--since it's corporate travel. Then I'll be back pounding the pavement again.
Unless you're an independent contractor there is a certain amount of anxiety that goes along with telecommuting. You know, out of sight, out of mind. That wouldn't be so bad if the telepresense tools were used more, but they aren't. You're lucky if you get a conference call, let alone video or webinar. So you feel useless because people can't tap you on the shoulder. That was my experience when I telecommuted for a year and a half. I felt like I was getting more and more isolated from the company by the day--which I was. Before you know it, it's like "gee, what does he even DO?" like something out of office-space.
I think for a lot of us there are these golden shackles, especially where health insurance is concerned. I could probably live OK, being out of debt, with money in the bank, with a very low salary, if you excluded health-care. As long as having health-care is the law (and it is, both at the state AND federal level) then it's really hard to turn your back on your established career and start over again doing something else you have no experience in with any expectation of making ends meet, at least when you're the sole wage-earner.
I don't find it surprising that so many doomer figures seem to make their living writing books, which frees them up for whatever preps they are doing. I would think doomer literature of the sort that Heinberg, Astyk, Greer, Kunstler, and Carolyn Baker hurl out is just as much a byproduct of BAU as a web developer like me. Nobody needs to know about Peak Everything once they are living it.
Just to give you an idea of the sort of Plan B stuff I have thought about so far, I thought about what it would take to make a go at landscaping and victory gardens for profit. The only way to do that would be for me to hire OTHER people to do the labor. I can not physically do enough labor myself, even if I had endless clients and the roto-tiller, to justify it, not compared to what I could make as a programmer. So I'd have to exploit some 3rd worlder I guess in order to be in 10 places at once, and that's just not what I want to do.
There are hobbies and then there are careers. For me, the doom-friendly skills can't seem to get beyond the hobby phase until I've literally run out of other options.
People who are already good with their hands are kind of in a better position than those who are in the "teaching old dogs new tricks" phase.