by copious.abundance » Sat 16 Apr 2011, 00:44:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') tried to link to Stuart Stanifor chart at TheOildrum today (too may pixels). SA has not nearly compensated for offline Libyan crude. Libya production has fallen 1.2 mbpd, while SA has only increased by .2 mbpd ...
Yeah, but notice from the same article that *world* supply only fell by 0.5 mbpd in March - which means that non-Saudi/non-Libya producers bumped up supply by a half-million bpd. This would also help explain why KSA felt no compelling need to make up the full 1.2 million bpd loss of Libyan production. Others were already taking up some of the slack for them.
Also, people are quick to shout, "KSA didn't make up the full production loss!!" and get all excited, but I don't recall KSA ever saying their spare capacity could be switched on and delivered overnight. It takes time to turn on pumps, pump the oil into pipes, get it into storage tanks, make arrangements for tankers to arrive, wait for aforementioned tankers to arrive, and deliver said oil. It's not like you can do all that in a few days, or even a few weeks.