by Outcast_Searcher » Wed 09 Mar 2011, 17:27:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Yes, it might be, and I think Jackson made a dopey remark, but to imagine nobody ever expected the government to supply material goods is more of a stretch - government supplied virtually all the material goods of the nation, in the form of resources and a lot of infrastructure, not to mention subsidies, etc etc. Not saying this was appropriate, just pointing out it is an historical fact.
I don't think I can go along with the idea of government supplying "virtually all" of the material goods -- just think about it -- what was the private sector doing aside from being taxed? Nothing?
OTOH, government certainly can and should provide resources. That isn't the issue. The issue is: how much? We've seen that "all various groups want" is way too much.
So now we have to choose. We have to compromise. We have to adapt and learn. Or, we have to basically die out.I wish, given how I see people bahave, that I could be more optimistic about the choices we will make.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.