by Shar_Lamagne » Thu 24 Feb 2011, 03:05:07
The earliest reference I could find seems to have been a Southern justification for actual slavery.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he growing industrial economy of the North swallowed these new workers into its factories, employing them for long hours at low wages. These manufacturing jobs were repetitious and sometimes hazardous. And from their meager earnings, Northern laborers had to pay for every one of life's necessities.
For some Southerners, the situation of Northern workers looked a lot worse than slavery. In fact, they argued, unlike the "wage slavery" of the North, the slavery system in the South provided food, clothing, medical care, and leisure to slaves, caring for them throughout their lives. Prominent defenders of slavery, including George Fitzhugh, based their pro-slavery attitudes on a racist assessment of African Americans as inferior to whites.
On top of its fundamentally racist outlook, this Southern justification of slavery ignored the central issue of self-determination: Northern workers could make their own choices, leaving their jobs or possibly heading West to the frontier, while slaves could not.
linkFrom this, the Wage Slavers set up the system so they got their slaves without having to care or provide for them.
Set up a large enough pool of interchangable workers, you have wage slavery, unless to have laws to prevent it.
Now the anti-abortion, anti-contraception stand makes sense. Got to keep pumping out those wage slaves.
The only thing that appears to have worked was the right to collective bargaining and to strike. The only way for that to work required the workers to stick together and act as one.
Laws themselves don't work without the means or the will to enforce them.
We are not so much as disillusioned but illusion free – Miranda Devine - journalist