Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Toyota Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby OilyMon » Wed 18 May 2005, 00:18:49

Hybrids, IMO are a very promising new technology, and are going to factor into a solution if one is to be found. I don't tink dismissing anything outright is a positive, constructive approach to anything, let alone an issue as important as the one currently under discussion. Any solution or technological switch is going to cost the world much of the already dwindling supply of oil, and hybrids are a good start.
User avatar
OilyMon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Southern Ontario

Postby DriveElectric » Wed 18 May 2005, 08:56:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', ' ')Last I checked, most people didn't want a population crash, did they? Did they? Please tell me I'm not alone in thinking billions of people dying would be a bad thing...


On this website, there are quite a few people who are eagerly cheering on a population dieoff. I get the distinct impression that certain members actually think a few billion deaths will be a good thing, so long as it does not include them.
User avatar
DriveElectric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Triffin » Wed 18 May 2005, 09:01:45

Just give us a Plug-in EV drivetrain
capable of a 200 mpc range and you'll
see gasoline/diesel use drop by 75% or more

Slap on whatever 'body' style that suits
your fancy and off you go ..

Do a "Google" on "Solectria Sunrise"



Triff ..
User avatar
Triffin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: SW Ct SW Va

Postby 0mar » Wed 18 May 2005, 14:00:28

It will make ZERO impact. Replacing all the cars in the US with hybrids today will only buy 2-5 years of extra cheap oil. The US uses about 14 mb d of petroleum for transportation. If we cut that in half due to hybrid use, there are 7 mbd of extra oil on the market. That 7mbd will be eaten up in 2-5 years due to increasing demand.

Like I said in my previous post, if we found 1 trillion more barrels tomorrow, peak oil will only be 17 or so years off.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Postby 0mar » Wed 18 May 2005, 14:01:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DriveElectric', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', ' ')Last I checked, most people didn't want a population crash, did they? Did they? Please tell me I'm not alone in thinking billions of people dying would be a bad thing...


On this website, there are quite a few people who are eagerly cheering on a population dieoff. I get the distinct impression that certain members actually think a few billion deaths will be a good thing, so long as it does not include them.


It will be. 1-2 billion people living in relative security and hope for the future or 7-9 billion people living in a Bladerunner/Mad Max type world? Which would you rather have?
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Postby lorenzo » Wed 18 May 2005, 15:38:18

It's a guestimation, but I think it's not incorrect to say that for each hybrid sold, about 1000 old classic dirty polluting combustion cars are sold on this planet.

Hybrids are a fine technology, nobody disputes this. What's more, advanced (bio)diesel hybrids will even be more efficient and cleaner than hydrogen fuel cell cars, if you look at the entire lifecycle of the car. So that's not the point.

The point is that it's way too little, way too late. There's no question about this.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby jaws » Wed 18 May 2005, 16:05:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', 'Y')ou know, just as Bigg doesn't need to hype every small efficiency increase as the one that's going to save the world, you guys don't need to say that every new technology is absolutely useless. Each one may make a 1% difference, useless on its own, but when you name 50 or 100 new technologies or methods, each of which saves only 1%, you've made a serious reduction.

And Lorenzo, as a scholar of peak oil, you should know that while 0.05% seems very small, the exponential function is very powerful. It doesn't take too many years of 960% sales increases to make 0.05% a very big percentage of the auto market. (Granted, that kind of growth won't last, but even at one tenth that, that's still a very steep exponential curve).

We on this site should be applauding every new technology and making sure it's adopted as fast and as far as possible. Last I checked, most people didn't want a population crash, did they? Did they? Please tell me I'm not alone in thinking billions of people dying would be a bad thing...
As some have already mentionned, the problem isn't efficiency. Hybrid cars aren't going to make a shred of difference if their owners decide to use them to drive twice as much. There's a popular singer here, famous for making a docu about deforestation, who got a hybrid the first chance he got. The man commutes at least two hundred kilometers from his home in 'nature' to downtown every day using his hybrid car, and he's so proud that he's protecting the environment in his hybrid car that he invites the media along with him to showcase it. That's the kind of delusional hypocrisy that hybrid cars have fueled. In the future we can all have hybrid cars, and we can all live in nature and be close to the environment and protect the environment. Never mind that we burn just as much fuel as before, if not more.

The peak oil problem isn't technology, it's people. People don't like making sacrifices, and sooner rather than later those sacrifices are going to be imposed on them. Hybrid cars makes the sacrifice a little easier to suffer for the people in rich industrialized nations, but hybrid cars aren't going to save the millions of people living in the megaslums of the African coast when US food exports start to disappear.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby clv101 » Wed 18 May 2005, 16:15:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'A')ll I'm saying is that you don't seem to have a real understanding of matters of scale.

Understatement of the month... I think this trend has been running through all the BiGG's threads recently - nice ideas, not to be knocked but (even in summation) no where near a suitable substitute for <$50 oil declining from 84 million barrels per day at 3-7% per year imminently.

BiGG, I'm not trying to knock you, god knows we need optimism but I think you lack the qualitative skills needed to evaluate the problem we're facing.
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK
Top

Postby arretium » Wed 18 May 2005, 16:30:19

I'd like to see diesel-electric hybrids. Diesel cars already outperform Hybrids for fuel efficiency. If the speed of diesel starting can be ramped up, diesel-electric hybrids could be a possibility. In that case we'd see 80-90 mpg vehicles.

The biggest problem I see with hybrids are the batteries. Batteries have to be replaced and they are not cheap. I'd seriously consider a hybrid, even more so a diesel hybrid, but the problem of batteries still weighs in my mind. I just wish I could find a diesel minivan and car here in US.
User avatar
arretium
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Postby Sgs-Cruz » Wed 18 May 2005, 17:50:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', 'I')t will make ZERO impact. Replacing all the cars in the US with hybrids today will only buy 2-5 years of extra cheap oil. The US uses about 14 mb d of petroleum for transportation. If we cut that in half due to hybrid use, there are 7 mbd of extra oil on the market. That 7mbd will be eaten up in 2-5 years due to increasing demand.

Like I said in my previous post, if we found 1 trillion more barrels tomorrow, peak oil will only be 17 or so years off.
Two to five years, if we knew what we were up against, could be the difference between a societal energy transition or a societal crash.

Don't bother telling me to read Deffeyes, or Heinberg, I have them all on my shelf behind me, and I don't buy the fact that a crash is inevitable.


edit:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', 'I')t will be. 1-2 billion people living in relative security and hope for the future or 7-9 billion people living in a Bladerunner/Mad Max type world? Which would you rather have?


If I had an iron-clad guarantee that I'd be one of those 1-2 billion people living in comfort and security, I'd be a fool not to take it.

But I don't have that guarantee. In the real world, if your wish comes true, one of two things will happen: I'll be part of the 75% of the world that dies, or it'll be the Third World and Asia that dies, and I'll live on. And I'll be in a personal hell for having wished for the deaths of four billion people. I can't believe you can sit there and honestly say that that would be a good thing. If you can crack free from the theoretical world of Internet forums for a second, try to think about the ramifications of what you're wishing for.
User avatar
Sgs-Cruz
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Top

Postby DriveElectric » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:20:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', '
')If you can crack free from the theoretical world of Internet forums for a second, try to think about the ramifications of what you're wishing for.


I agree. Many of the dieoff cheerleaders seem to have no comprehension of that actually happening. The process of watching 4 or 5 billion people die of starvation, disease and/or war would be just about the most horrible period of time imaginable. Yet these idiots seem to be actually hoping for it to happen and have it start ASAP.
User avatar
DriveElectric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby smiley » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:34:33

There are about 10 shiny new Priuses in the parking lot at my work. The company decided to ditch some of the old company cars and change them to hybrids.

I think they fell for the high-tech, environmentally conscious image of these things. I guess we will see a lot of hybrids in the coming years if they get properly hyped.

But I wonder whether it will make such an impact on the overall fuel consumption. In terms of fuel consumption the hybrid is not really a step forward. After all it still is less efficient than a 1939 Volkswagen Beetle.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Postby Sgs-Cruz » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:40:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', 'B')ut I wonder whether it will make such an impact on the overall fuel consumption. In terms of fuel consumption the hybrid is not really a step forward. After all it still is less efficient than a 1939 Volkswagen Beetle.
Ain't that the truth. Now if we could keep our great hybrid technology, but, you know, maybe not put 300 freaking horsepower in our cars (which are usually driven by 1 person!) we might be somewhere. With full hybridization, you could drive a personal commuter vehicle (even one with four wheels) off 10 or 20 kW and still travel at highway speeds and have decent-enough acceleration. If we weren't hung up on having earth-shaking power in our cars, that is...
User avatar
Sgs-Cruz
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Top

Postby 0mar » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:47:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DriveElectric', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', '
')If you can crack free from the theoretical world of Internet forums for a second, try to think about the ramifications of what you're wishing for.


I agree. Many of the dieoff cheerleaders seem to have no comprehension of that actually happening. The process of watching 4 or 5 billion people die of starvation, disease and/or war would be just about the most horrible period of time imaginable. Yet these idiots seem to be actually hoping for it to happen and have it start ASAP.


I am fully aware of what the ramifications are.

I'm in this for the species boys and girls. It's simple numbers.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

Postby BiGG » Thu 19 May 2005, 10:31:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'I')t's a guestimation, but I think it's not incorrect to say that for each hybrid sold, about 1000 old classic dirty polluting combustion cars are sold on this planet.

Hybrids are a fine technology, nobody disputes this. What's more, advanced (bio)diesel hybrids will even be more efficient and cleaner than hydrogen fuel cell cars, if you look at the entire lifecycle of the car. So that's not the point.

The point is that it's way too little, way too late. There's no question about this.


Where do you get the idea that its “too little to late”? Besides the current Toyota Prius, Honda Insight, & Honda Civic hybrids ....here is a partial list of other hybrids coming out within the year alone, Chevrolet Silverado, GMC Sierra, Dodge Ram, Ford Escape, Honda Accord, Lexus RX 400h, Toyota Highlander, Ford Escape, Chevrolet Tahoe, & GMC Yukon)

Besides that, we have millions of 2005 models that are “flex-fuel” offerings and can run on either regular gas or blends of 15% gas and 85% Ethanol (E-85) like the Chevrolet Tahoe, Chevrolet Suburban, Chevy Avalanche, Chevy Silverado, Chrysler Town and Country, Chrysler Sebring , Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Caravan, Dodge cargo minivan, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Ram Pickup, Dodge Stratus, Ford Taurus, Ford Ranger pickups, Ford Explorer, Mercury Mountaineer, Mercury Sable, GMC Sierra, GMC Yukon & Yukon XL, Mercedes-Benz C240, Mercedes-Benz C320, Nissan Titan, Mazda B3000 ….. and many more around the world being produced right now!

Ethanol production in the United States alone jumped 23% last year over 2003 production and 109% since 2000 for a total of 3.41 billon gallons in annual production.. Another giant leap is coming with all of the current plant expansion and new plants being completed this year and many, many more are being started right now. This is happening all over the world right now!

Plus ….. natural gas/propane vehicles from nearly every brand & type of car, SUV, & pick-up to buses are offered this year. These are mainly used by fleet owners but nonetheless, they are being produced & used all over the world right now.

All of this doesn’t even include the very cool fully electric & hydrogen vehicles coming on to the market.

It’s not too little to late by any means ….. cars & trucks that run on regular gas (with blends of only 10% Ethanol) are being phased out quickly now and with the world being at the half way point of “known” reserves regarding oil, will be long gone before oil becomes any real problem.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby BiGG » Thu 19 May 2005, 10:52:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clv101', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'A')ll I'm saying is that you don't seem to have a real understanding of matters of scale.

Understatement of the month... I think this trend has been running through all the BiGG's threads recently - nice ideas, not to be knocked but (even in summation) no where near a suitable substitute for <$50 oil declining from 84 million barrels per day at 3-7% per year imminently.

BiGG, I'm not trying to knock you, god knows we need optimism but I think you lack the qualitative skills needed to evaluate the problem we're facing.


You are entitled to your opinion but like many others here, I wonder how much you know about the world that is already being built eliminating antiquated oil. Today’s world has nothing to do with being at, or close to the half way point of “known” reserves imo because we are already building a world that will use very little of it soon.

Its not me lacking “qualitative” skills at all, I think some of you are lacking a basic understanding of the “Logistics”, “Macroeconomics”, & "Marketing" involved for changes like this but they are coming rapidly as oil is nasty, dirty, cancer causing, environmentally very unfriendly, and everything replacing it is good for all of US, it just takes a little time putting it in place.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby No-Oil » Thu 19 May 2005, 11:05:34

The real pronblems with hybrids of whatever kind & any other alternative power vehicles, is that they are all sold or advertised to support the "business as usual" scenario. Buy one of these & save the planet & still enjoy the same "western" lifestyle as before ! They do not work as replacement vehicles for existing serviceable vehicles.

The energy reduction answer is very very simple, if it takes 35 barrels of oil to build a car (an average figure) & that car is used to travels X miles a year, then it is simpler to reduce the mileage by 50% & thus effectively double the mpg/per year to save energy. Rather than to waste another 35 barrels of oil to buy a new hybrid (or whatever) then do the same mileage per year as you did in your old car. Basically this does not pan out econimically or environmentally.

I have priced up hybrids as replacements & I can get 5 years worth of fuel at my current mileage out of my car for the difference in cost required to "change" to a hybrid. I can extend this to 7-9years fuel allowing for fuel price increase, by reducing my annual mileage by 50%. I can't reduce my work mileage much because I live close to work, but I can reduce my fuel consumption, by cycling in good weather & using a 110mpg scooter when the weather is bad, thus I can knock about 25% off my annual fuel useage without resorting to extremes. The other 15% will come from not making non essential journeys in the car.

If you are buying a your first vehicle, then hybrids & other economical vehicles should be promoted or made compulsory. You can't miss a V8 (or high power) if you have never had one !
The roller coaster is still climbing, but it's near the top now !
Where there's a WAR there's a WAY :(
User avatar
No-Oil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri 31 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Postby 0mar » Thu 19 May 2005, 11:59:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clv101', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'A')ll I'm saying is that you don't seem to have a real understanding of matters of scale.

Understatement of the month... I think this trend has been running through all the BiGG's threads recently - nice ideas, not to be knocked but (even in summation) no where near a suitable substitute for <$50 oil declining from 84 million barrels per day at 3-7% per year imminently.

BiGG, I'm not trying to knock you, god knows we need optimism but I think you lack the qualitative skills needed to evaluate the problem we're facing.


You are entitled to your opinion but like many others here, I wonder how much you know about the world that is already being built eliminating antiquated oil. Today’s world has nothing to do with being at, or close to the half way point of “known” reserves imo because we are already building a world that will use very little of it soon.

Its not me lacking “qualitative” skills at all, I think some of you are lacking a basic understanding of the “Logistics”, “Macroeconomics”, & "Marketing" involved for changes like this but they are coming rapidly as oil is nasty, dirty, cancer causing, environmentally very unfriendly, and everything replacing it is good for all of US, it just takes a little time putting it in place.


We're the ones delusional?

The IEA says we will need 130mbd by 2020.

These forecasts don't look like a global economy weaning itself off oil. Oil has a damn monopoly on transportation; close to 95% of all vehicles use oil to be powered. If we use the definination of fossil fuels, 99% use fossil fuels of some sort to be powered. We consume 84 mbd and there hasn't been a single year, outside the 70s, in which demand declined. Demand is only increasing and the entire global economy is dependant on oil.

All these alternatives, they are pittances compared to oil/fossil fuels. Ethanol, currently, needs fossil fuel inputst to make any sizable yield; a yield that is less than a drop in the ocean compared to demand. It can't even suffice for a single days worth of transportation. Biodiesel is even less than ethanol. Despite everyone wishing for an alternative, they are simply inadequeate to fufill the transportation industry. If you've read any of my posts, doubling the known reserves only buys us 17 or so years of extra cheap oil. 17 years is nothing compared to the asset and cultural inertia in place. Hell, cars have a half-life of about 10 years. Considering that almost no market indicatiors will happen in time, we are fucked.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

Postby Starvid » Thu 19 May 2005, 12:08:38

I don't think it is very strange that most of the doomsters on this forum are Americans. You seem to think that peak oil is mainly a car problem, and since you can't live without you cars everyone is going to die and the world is going to end. Hybrid cars, electric cars, biodiesel cars, there is no end to it. But peak oil is not a car problem, not an energy problem or a even a liquid fuel problem. It is a transportation problem. And since transportation equals cars in their world, the American doomster brain short circuits.

Have you people never heard of trams or bikes? Of trains? The American obsession with the car means you ignore all the alternatives, alternatives that are used on a daily basis in Europe. It's sad what has become of the land of the iron horse.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Postby RiverRat » Thu 19 May 2005, 13:07:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '
')Have you people never heard of trams or bikes? Of trains? The American obsession with the car means you ignore all the alternatives, alternatives that are used on a daily basis in Europe. It's sad what has become of the land of the iron horse.


Ahhhh … the simplicity of this. Why did no one think of this sooner?

I live in a rural/suburban area in Appalachia (steel and coal rust belt). The only public transportation is a very limited bus schedule route (operating only from 7:30am to 6:00pm).

No jobs available in the steel mill that I can walk to. There are no jobs available in the coal mines. The block plant I can see from my house isn’t hiring either. I’m forced to commute 50 miles to the outskirts of a large city to have game full employment.

The US of A is massive and spread out. The town I live in has aprox 1,500 people in it. The nearest grocery and hardware store is 9 miles away.

It's rather easy to say … ‘hey take the tram silly’… But in reality it isn’t that easy to do.

I’m just a byproduct of many years of poor community planning. :cry:
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron