by Outcast_Searcher » Mon 17 Jan 2011, 22:40:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrEnergyCzar', 'I') also think we'll try and take care of the sick and our elders and keep educating our children....not that teaching jobs are exactly hot these days....
MrEnergyCzar
Those are laudable goals. Education being in our own self interest is so blatantly obvious that I keep THINKING that surely our base education system in the U.S. won't continue to deteriorate. (Then I consider how many cashiers can't subtract, or even realize that the needed OPERATION is to subtract if the cash register goes down. Then I get scared and mad).
As for educating adults - retraining to keep workers viable and corporations productive USED to be something corporations did in their own enlightened self-interest. If my experience/observations at IBM (once considered a fabulous company for its employees) are any indication - this behavior is almost DEAD.
Being in my early 50's, and having to imagine myself getting old(er) -- I have to ask myself HOW MUCH care of the elderly is "in the best interests" of humanity long term IF things get very tight.
Should I, for example, consume enough medicare dollars to help maintain the health of 100+ people under 40 if I become sickly long term? Of 500 or 1000?
Perhaps I shouldn't, regardless. If I can't pay for it (i.e. via net taxes into the system) - wow. Now multiply me by tens of millions of folks, just in the U.S. in coming decades.
That's a really tough issue, IMO. Ethics are derived from (IMO) society's opinion about what has historically been "good" for the society.
The way current trends are heading, and have been heading since the oil spikes of the 70's -- I have to strongly suspect these ethics for care of the elderly will be seriously re-evaluated. I would argue that the healthcare crisis in places like the U.S. and England (the NHS is undergoing a MAJOR reorg soon, per The Economist) is just a symptom pointing to the INEVITABILITY of just such a major re-evaluation.
I'm reminded again of learning about Toffler's "Future Shock" comment at around age 12 or so....
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.