Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 25 Dec 2010, 10:54:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')Damn Mos, you are stuck in a funk.


Personally, I think a statement like "you need a vacation" disregards the complexity that is inherent in dealing with these issues.


And pray tell what martyring yourself to the cause is doing to resolve these complex issues?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 25 Dec 2010, 11:55:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', '
')These experiences combined with other ones unmentioned (I don't want to write a novel here) give me the impression that there is this poisones individualism at work, but really what society is offering is a selection of stereotype to choose from. Most people of my generation seem to judge themselves with such prerequisites. They would rather fit in with the crowd then truly be individuals.


There is something ironic happening out there with this hyper individualism. Underneath all this fine tuning of ones individual "needs" is this homogenization of experiences where we are all channeling and funneling our entertainment through a narrow conduit called digital technology. It creates the "illusion" of an expansive powerful tool when at the end of the day it is more just herding us all down the same conduit. It actually serves more to make us uniform and collectively uni-cellular.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 12:30:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')And pray tell what martyring yourself to the cause is doing to resolve these complex issues?


Who said I was martyring myself? Nothing's going to be resolved if we all just lighten up and try to just live day to day. If anything, that's a denialist stance. The first step is to be sensitive to the issues, which hurts.
mos6507
 

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 13:27:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', ' ') Nothing's going to be resolved if we all just lighten up and try to just live day to day.


I disagree. The transition will be resolved through how consequences act on our society as it lives day by day. Without the catalyst to get the reaction going we are in a stale mate. You are the first to point this out. Our culture is currently not elastic, neither is the asset inertia and the physical infrastructure that underpins everything. The time for proactive mitigation will be pretty much overwhelmed with consequences that will leave us no choice but to be reactive in putting out fires trying to keep the status quo going.

So yes it hurts. To accept this deeply doesn't mean we deny ourselves
an orientation to celebrate and love and cherish the abundance around you that is a gift of the planet. Otherwise you become a whistle blower much like a religious matronly spinster prude in a small town who is constantly vigilant over every sin committed; with every dance, every kiss, every bottle of beer, every cuss work spoken. Since when has this position ever been affective at changing peoples attitude. That is where I accuse you of martyring yourself if you deny yourself any of the benefits of celebrating the beauty and abundance around you.

In the meantime awaiting the consequences I humbly take folks on hikes watching birds and monkeys. I know the greater picture. I know the futility of any hope in the continuity of this model. I recognize that I am living the life that is obsolete and has no future. I acknowledge the elitist nature of my existence. But I am deeply humbled and grateful for the opportunity to still surround myself with nature and people that allows me to experience my life in a spiritual context.

We are all just about equally obsolete in the lifestyles we are still holding on to. Why NOT enjoy them day by day until consequences break through the impasse.

Offer me an alternative vision.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 16:02:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')The transition will be resolved through how consequences act on our society as it lives day by day.


That's called the frog boiling in the pot, or the yeast happily reproducing in the petri dish as the clock is 1 minute from midnight. Can't you see how that might, you know, make the crash worse?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')Without the catalyst to get the reaction going we are in a stale mate.


The catalyst is supposed to be things like the original Limits to Growth book, almost 40 years old now, not the supermarket store shelves going empty.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')Otherwise you become a whistle blower much like a religious matronly spinster prude in a small town who is constantly vigilant over every sin committed


It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it.

Would you like to tell Richard Heinberg and Bill McKibben to pack it in as well because they aren't maximizing their personal happiness by emphasizing the negative?

Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')That is where I accuse you of martyring yourself if you deny yourself any of the benefits of celebrating the beauty and abundance around you.


I don't know why you think I don't. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 16:21:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '
')
Don't hold your breath. Hundreds of years after Malthus claimed the same basic thing, we're still waiting.


Whether it is die-off lite or a something more the catalyst of consequences are hard to deny at this point.


Thats what Ehrlich said as well, when he was recycling Malthus. Face it, some part of this "the end is nigh!" routine is part of the human condition. We worry about the future because its...well...the future! Could go well, could suck. The conditions viewed as indicators of Doom are always "hard to deny"....until we wait 10 years and discover they may have been hard to deny AT THE TIME, but in hindsight they seem kind of goofy.

Until the next time, when we start up the cycle all over again.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')The points I was making are relevant whether in a hundred years we have 2 billion or 10 billion on the planet.

Of course as an ecologist I would prefer to see that number closer to 2 billion than 10 billion. But I am not evangelical about the final numbers.


Well, that makes two of us then. 2 billion in the year 2100 would be nice...don't know if we, as humans, will choose a path that leads to that number, I'm betting we'll end up higher than that, but who knows? Maybe, collectively, we'll make some reasonable choices. Maybe, and more likely, we'll be forced to make reasonable choices.

LOL. I guess one of the reasonable choices they made on Easter Island was cannibalism, seeing as how they weren't able to invent their way out of a wood shortage :-D
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 17:46:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '
')I don't know why you think I don't. The two aren't mutually exclusive.


Of course they are not mutually exclusive. That is the point I was making. You seemed to be getting a little evangelical which is why I reminded you. I normally wouldn't have commented except you seemed to need a gentle reminder of perspective. I've been there dude so I spotted the obsession.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 26 Dec 2010, 18:23:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '
')Would you like to tell Richard Heinberg and Bill McKibben to pack it in as well because they aren't maximizing their personal happiness by emphasizing the negative?


They both have to be sobered by the momentum of the mass of humanity on the planet compared to the statistically rather irrelevant following they have generated.

A speech Heinberg gave at one of the early peak oil congresses in the US ( in Ohio) that I participated in way back in 2004 had a profound affect on me. There was one particular point he made during that speech that continues to echo in my head to this day.

It was something to the affect that disruptions to the very physical infrastructure that underpins our culture have the potential to create revolutions far more dramatic than any ideological based political movement.

That speech made me understand the difference of peak oil to say the ideological struggle of the environmental movement that I was exposed to as an undergraduate studying environmental studies in the 70's. The latter was ideological where as peak oil is physical and geological.

That was the moment the light bulb went off in my head regarding the nature of resource constraints and consequences of overshoot being the driver of transformation and transition going forward and his speech pollinated the idea I have repeatedly mentioned here regarding the
'catalyst of consequences '

6 years later and we see no real transition because we see no real serious consequence (threats alone don't bite!!!) to the physical and energy infrastructure that underpins our culture.

No real reason to fret over our peril when we are affectively stalemated. In the meantime I'll rent out cabins and enjoy the company of birdwatchers and entomologists. When consequences start maybe this place in Panama serves another purpose. A place to recede to?
A place to build a small refuge? A place to get shot? A place to surrender to the chaos and bid farewell to this ephemeral of moments that represents this existence.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 27 Dec 2010, 10:14:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')Of course they are not mutually exclusive. That is the point I was making. You seemed to be getting a little evangelical which is why I reminded you. I normally wouldn't have commented except you seemed to need a gentle reminder of perspective. I've been there dude so I spotted the obsession.


You mean like my post about zombie Christmas? I can walk both sides of the fence.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 27 Dec 2010, 10:26:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')They both have to be sobered by the momentum of the mass of humanity on the planet compared to the statistically rather irrelevant following they have generated.


Yet they continue. Sometimes conscience trumps more hedonistic ideas about fulfillment.

Perhaps doing the right thing (i.e. being evangelical) even when it's a lost cause is the only thing left that gives some people meaning in their lives. It's probably a better thing to do than to kick back with hot buttered popcorn waiting for the apocalypse.

And even if they don't save the world, there are lots of smaller impacts that we all have in our life that we can't see unless we were able to view the world without us having existed.

Image

But to retreat to a place in which self gratification (even tree-hugging bucket-list activities like "let's walk barefoot through the amazon while it's still here!" gratification) is the main goal is not my idea of the best way to deal with doom.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 27 Dec 2010, 15:05:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')They both have to be sobered by the momentum of the mass of humanity on the planet compared to the statistically rather irrelevant following they have generated.


Yet they continue. Sometimes conscience trumps more hedonistic ideas about fulfillment.


I am grateful for the niche they have carved for themselves

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Perhaps doing the right thing (i.e. being evangelical) even when it's a lost cause is the only thing left that gives some people meaning in their lives.


Isn't the coping mechanism this evanglelism provides ultimately a form of taking care of oneself?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
But to retreat to a place in which self gratification is the main goal is not my idea of the best way to deal with doom
.


Whatever rocks your boat. Again, is evangelism not a retreat into coping with one self? Ultimately underneath the holier than thou evangelism one espouses is the SELF taking care of itself.

I spent too many days deep in the woods in my life to deny myself the sensual pleasures that being deep in the wilderness provides.

I also deeply believe that there is a deep hypocrisy at work here that is ultimately really about increasing human resiliency. Call me misanthropic but I frankly find this the exact pathway to prove Malthus wrong once again and pass through the peak oil / climate change bottleneck largely unscathed.

That would really HURT my feelings :)
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 27 Dec 2010, 23:59:48

It never rang true with me that because I am in a traumatic situation I must be traumatised.
I went through some very intense grieving and still 'worry' about the future, especially for my children.
But the futility of dwelling in misery about things too big for me to change eventually struck me as an imposition on my too short life.

Easier to justify trying to do the things which have the ring of truth about them in your heart of hearts.
I believe there are quantum level influences human beings are capable of which are thwarted completely by being fixed in a negative mindset.

The MSM works on our minds in this way. We are constantly fed the 3 part diet:

Incomplete news stories with enough negative slant to scare us but not enough information to do anything with (When was the last time you saw a MSM news article with a list of people to lobby at the end, except perhaps in a natural disaster situation?).

Distraction, 'entertainment news', celebrity gossip.

Abstraction, market hype.

All serving to keep us nicely confused, pliable consumers of no threat to the runnings of the machine.
If anyone seriously threatens the works, they are terminated, joining the Darwin awards.
We are forcibly kept politicly impotent only when the mass hypnosis machine fails to render us 'Law abiding Citizens'. You want Zombies? No need to wait for post peak apocalypse, just look outside your door if you live in megalopolis.

The anger stage of grief is I feel the most transformative; be it channeled creatively and intelligently or destructively and dangerously. It is only in deeply personalised anger in relation to fear which will motivate severe change in an individual's life. When I meet people who have deep understanding of the reasons for collective grief, I tend to see them through the prism: "So what have you done, what are you doing about it, do you have a cohesive strategy to cope and gain optimal perspective?"
If the optimal perspective is based in denial of the very reasons for collective grief, it cannot be a fully developed conception. But if the burden of knowlege is such that it has broken the spirit of the knower, then, well it would breach the CoC to suggest the next likely step. That being socially unacceptabe, reunification with the Zombie Nation seems to be a very common outcome. Just like the other Zombies, but with a 'Doomspeak' (TM) chip.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 28 Dec 2010, 11:56:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')Again, is evangelism not a retreat into coping with one self? Ultimately underneath the holier than thou evangelism one espouses is the SELF taking care of itself.


Yes and no. When taking care of the self could also mean helping the world be a better place, even in a small way, it's a nobler way to go. What the mass-extinction tells us is that the self is a part of the larger whole. Any attempt to focus on the self has some small impact on the whole. To deny this is tragedy of the commons. To accept this and act for the self in spite of it is, IMHO, immoral. For instance, to be a Lovelockian doomer and work as a truck driver in the Alberta tar sands. That's something I could never live with.

Still, just to bring this closer to home, I work for a corporate travel agency. And I hate the hypocrisy of that. I walk into the office each day and I see airline seats being used as chairs in the lobby and Fox News blaring on one of their two flat-screen monitors. I have become Gil Sanford yet again. I'm doing it because the economy sucks and it was the last job offer I had before I lost my unemployment. But I am aware of my complicity in ecocide even in some small way by doing this job, as well as the job being located where I have to drive a half hour each way (in a region known for good public transit). But I'm not about to sooth my guilt just for the sake of not having guilt. I am aware that the decisions we make differ in how much they support BAU and that we should strive to make wiser, informed choices, whenever possible.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')That would really HURT my feelings :)


In discussions with Monte, he often expressed a sort of clinical detachment that in some circles would be considered enlightenment. The problem is that, depending on your perspective, it could be seen as misanthropic in a genocidal 007 supervillain sort of way.

So yes, I can step back enough to see the larger tableau, to erase our human-centric viewpoint and see how maybe our extinction or near-extinction is meant to be, or in some way necessary like the earth shaking off a virus. You know, sacred demise. However, the human part of me, the compassionate part of me, can not hold onto this perspective for that long. The trick is to find some middle-path that allows one to have empathy both for the ecosystem and for your fellow man. That's really the dilemma, ala lifeboat ethics. It's The Man showing compassion for the thief in Cormac McCarthy's The Road. It's about life being more than thermodynamics and the law of the jungle. I don't care that nature's amoral. To me, that's what being human is all about and is nothing to be ashamed of.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby paimei01 » Tue 28 Dec 2010, 13:02:21

http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter4-1.php
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s that word mine indicates, ownership implies an attachment of things to self. The more we own, the more we are. The constellation of me and mine grows. But no matter how large the discrete and separate self grows, it is still far smaller than the self of the hunter-gatherer. The pre-separation mind is able to affirm, all at once and without contradiction, "I am this body," "I am this tribe," "I am the jungle," "I am the world." No matter how much of the jungle we control, we are smaller than the one who knows, "I am the jungle." No matter how dominant we are socially, we are far less than one who knows, "I am my tribe." And far less secure, too, because all of these appendages to our tiny separate selves may be easily sundered from us. We are therefore perpetually and irremediably insecure. We go to great lengths to protect all these accessories of identity, our possessions and money and reputations, and when our house is burglarized, our wallet stolen, or our reputation besmirched, we feel as if our very selves have been violated.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Ibon » Tue 28 Dec 2010, 17:26:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')All serving to keep us nicely confused, pliable consumers of no threat to the runnings of the machine.
If anyone seriously threatens the works, they are terminated, joining the Darwin awards.
We are forcibly kept politicly impotent only when the mass hypnosis machine fails to render us 'Law abiding Citizens'. You want Zombies? No need to wait for post peak apocalypse, just look outside your door if you live in megalopolis.



This collective fear is part of the tyranny of the group. The group mind is a powerful force, partially reinforced by all of us receiving the same digital downloads on our computers and from the MSM. It's great to just shut it down as much as possible or at least really make an effort to budget your time to a minimum exposing yourself to this.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he anger stage of grief is I feel the most transformative; be it channeled creatively and intelligently or destructively and dangerously. It is only in deeply personalised anger in relation to fear which will motivate severe change in an individual's life. When I meet people who have deep understanding of the reasons for collective grief, I tend to see them through the prism: "So what have you done, what are you doing about it, do you have a cohesive strategy to cope and gain optimal perspective?"
But if the burden of knowlege is such that it has broken the spirit of the knower, then, well it would breach the CoC to suggest the next likely step. That being socially unacceptabe, reunification with the Zombie Nation seems to be a very common outcome. Just like the other Zombies, but with a 'Doomspeak' (TM) chip.


Anger and grief ahead of the consequences means your perception is not yet being confirmed back to you from events. You can feel very alien in the collective when the majority around you are in denial and drinking the cool aid they are downloading from the digital machine. It is lonely and dark.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Tue 28 Dec 2010, 17:35:26

How many of us live in either one of these extreme states? Myself and everyone I know exists as part of a social group with responsibilities and expectations. However I do sense there is a hyper-individualists/anti-social element among doomers...
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 28 Dec 2010, 23:34:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', 'H')ow many of us live in either one of these extreme states? Myself and everyone I know exists as part of a social group with responsibilities and expectations. However I do sense there is a hyper-individualists/anti-social element among doomers...


Without individuals questioning and filtering systems, they inevitably stagnate and become perverse.
The 'everyone I know' are by the sounds of it, people who accept and believe in the current power structure in their lives. Such people will be of no consequence when resource constraints severly restrict the capability of Government to do anything to help them. There is nothing necessarily anti social about living a libertarian ethos; to those with the proclivity this may be seen as the only socially responsible path. If your sense of Doom does not inspire you to sieze control over your own life and lead your family and friends towards your vision of 'the Light' then what the hell point is there?

Seems to me some people's attitude is that the Government/s are doing everything wrong, they should be doing this and that, but they don't and they aren't going to blah blah blah; but never get to the point of seeing the writing on the wall regarding their own power to change their own lives. Like they are simply swept along by circumstances with talking about it on the internet being their only anchor to a sense of their own perception of reality. Worse is the finger pointing and name calling at those labelled Libertarian, as if people who think like this could even begin to understand what a true libertarian is. Why resent someone for seeing what you see but resigning themselves to accepting they aren't going to change the trajectory of the world so why not change their own? What is wrong with someone wanting to see off TEOTWAWKI from a rainforest vista or a cave in the mountains or a handcarved boat on the ocean or a deserted island? Who cares? What difference does it really make? Aren't you really just expressing frustration at your own impotence?

What some people fail completely to understand is that as a direct consequence of resource constraints, big Government will not continue to exist in it's current form. The more complex the system the more vulnerable to collapse and Government is the most complex system. The continual argument that we need Government to provide emergency services is complete garbage. Any man worth his salt anywhere will willingly volunteer for such community work 1 day a week, for example.

Remember the slogan, 'Think globally, act locally'? Well the 1st bit is still sinking in.....
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 01:25:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'W')hat some people fail completely to understand is that as a direct consequence of resource constraints, big Government will not continue to exist in it's current form. The more complex the system the more vulnerable to collapse and Government is the most complex system. The continual argument that we need Government to provide emergency services is complete garbage. Any man worth his salt anywhere will willingly volunteer for such community work 1 day a week, for example.

Remember the slogan, 'Think globally, act locally'? Well the 1st bit is still sinking in.....


Which is a good thing! Free market capitalism does not require big nanny state government! :-D :-D :-D
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 02:31:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '
')downloading from the digital machine. It is lonely and dark.


I have no doubt that if we were not able to download from the digital machine we'd still be in denial. So I wouldn't seek to point to the internet as the root our problems.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Hyper individualism vs the tyranny of the group

Unread postby mos6507 » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 02:34:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', '
')Free market capitalism does not require big nanny state government! :-D :-D :-D


All hail Enron and Bear Stearns!
mos6507
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron