by Pops » Mon 15 Nov 2010, 11:52:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'A')s soon as doing the right thing becomes inconvenient, we resort to coming up with rules to make doing the wrong thing "OK" when it is expedient. "Fighting terrorism" is a recent and flagrant example of this.
Yes, exactly. I know people want to make this (along with everything else) about the other "party" but it's about the law.
Either we are a country of laws or we aren't. As soon as the law is that the executive can "legally" make make such a decision
without review then there effectively
is no rule of law. Presidents make decisions that are sometimes later found to be illegal or unconstitutional. If they aren't always hung for it, I can live with that, it ain't an easy job.
But it is unacceptable for their actions be beyond review.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)