Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry winter

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 16:55:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fiddlerdave', ' ')The whole reason Social Security was started was because of the terrible plight of the elderly


I guess conservatives think SS was invented even though it wasn't needed - there were no poor people in the US because they were all being taken care of by private charity. But the guvmint decided to implement the program anyway, thereby creating poor people.
Ludi
 

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Cloud9 » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:04:42

What part of the word unsustainable is not understood? A %100 tax on the rich will not end the deficit. At this point, taxes are irrelevant. The welfare recipients, every one from Jamie Diamond down to the poorest person in the country have sucked the system dry. Our solution is to inflate the currency. This is the most unfair tax that anyone can imagine. It makes food and fuel and housing too expensive for the poorest of the poor. While the bottom quartile starves, Jamie Diamond will continue to do God’s work by buying another yacht, and we, the stupid monkeys that we are will think we are richer because we have more pieces of green paper in our pockets.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:09:59

Now conservatives COULD get rid of SS and Welfare by taking care of poor people themselves, rendering these programs again unnecessary.

But they would rather end the programs FIRST, and let the poor die off naturally.

:|
Ludi
 

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Mesuge » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:29:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', ' ')In his heart of hearts he believes what Reverend Wright told him. He is a socialist and a racist. I knew that those sentiments would be to a large extent constrained by his own party and the demands of the office.


Nice of you sharing this family story, but unless I missed your humor, the above part of analysis is simply wrong. Obama was brought up by his white grandparents, his "community work" in black hood is just a bogus legend, basically he's got white firmware in half-blood kenyan body. This is very different from a genuine 200yrs experience of black americans, perhaps even MLK and definately MalcolmX would consider him as whitey neocon lite bastard. The global orchestrated media campaign as first black person elected president was one great phony circus, and rather painfull to watch. Is he a racist? Perhaps but not from the position you assume from U.S. media indoctrination, it's rather the other way around, despite his black spouse and stuff.. Oh, the Reverend Wright story, that's the same astroturf, where he tried to build up a base as genuine afro-american.

He is definately not a socialist, if you meant something along the lines bankrupt new left/social democrat ala Blair-Brown/Clinton, yep that would be more accurate. I read you in the american VERY SKEWED political discourse, this might be close to general term "socialist" - basically bordering "anarcho-communist" in the american environment. Which is obviously not the case with this guy.

I don't hate him, or wish him anything bad, but he will go down the history as one of the worst catastrophes, eventough he is just yet another version of delegated presidency aka imperial puppet. But the buck stops with him in the sense, he allowed to be hired as pseudo minority representing talent for this dog and ponny show during times of elevated crisis, in the first place..
Last edited by Mesuge on Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:43:54, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Quinny » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:43:21

The more I read this board the more I realise that most Americans do nut have a freaking clue what Socialism means. :(
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Mesuge » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:51:44

Quinny> The real meaning of socialism (scandinavian sort) is what federated americans will never experience, perhaps only after the great implosion into separate enclaves, chunks of the NW territories have got good chances to get close on some of its aspects among other candidates..
Last edited by Mesuge on Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:52:59, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby The_Toecutter » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:52:29

Oakley is pretty much correct.

That being said, the poor are not going to just roll over and die. Children of the Greatest Generation and Boomers, upon seeing that they are being cut off from money they need to live, also aren't going to be happy, nor will they be happy if they have to be taxed 70%+ of their income to pay for it when their parents people had already paid into social security their entire lives and have not gotten back out of it anything near what they had put in.

High inflation(10%+ YoY) or hyper inflation without a commensurate wage increase and new jobs will turn this nation into a 3rd world shithole in time as well. What good is a social security check if it is no longer enough to live fof of, or worse, doesn't even buy a loaf of bread?

The money for the program has already been spent; the only real solution is to somehow get it back, if that's even possible.

I see four possible longterm outcomes:

1) Americans are going to lose their ignorance, and likely become violent against their leaders to establish a better government
2) Americans are going to lose their ignorance and peacefully transition to a new way of life and use whatever physical resources around to do it(our leaders at the moment aren't willing to allow this outcome)
3) Americans are going to remain ignorant altogether and become violent as scarcity sets in; chaos would result
4) Americans are going to remain ignorant altogether, and put the next Adolph Hitler in power that finds a convenient scapegoat, or starts the next World War

Multiple of these scenarios could also occur in a certain order.

With regard to this winter, I personally think a lot of Americans are going to slip into homelessness, provided that things don't improve(and so far, they are not). If this does happen, do not count on government statistics to accurately reflect this, even if Food Stamps and other stats will give some indication as to the situation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '
')What were the Republicans doing the last four years? Just voting no?


Why don't you know these things already? :roll:

The Republicans voted "no" in the last two years to try to stop Obamacare and other Obama policies.


I see, so you're going to ignore the questions.


Some have called him "planted agent" in the past precisely for the reasons that you exemplify.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')he only plan the Republicans have is "destroy Obama." They have nothing positive to offer, as far as they have indicated. Maybe they have a secret plan somewhere to fix things, but the only plan they have provided is "destroy Obama."

Happy to see some other plan which they intend to implement once they have destroyed Obama.

Still waiting for it.

:?:


The same can be said for Democrats, minus the "destroy Obama" part, that is unless a 'plan' is the status quo. Both parties are doing their part to ensure a solution will never be reached; it is not in their interests. :(

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'I') will be happy if there is no significant legislation that passes from either the Repubs or the Dems over the next two years. Unlike some others on this board, I prefer local solutions and people figuring out for themselves how to build their own personal lifeboat.


Don't get your hopes up; some of the worst legislation to pass with regard to our civil liberties and our economy has been consistently bi-partisan.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Pops » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:53:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'L')udi, which would you prefer, prices so high that government assistance checks won’t buy a month’s worth of food or fewer people on government assistance? I’m a government employee and you people need to cut my salary.

I've always wondered how merit is established in government departments since there isn't an easy yardstick like profit.

I think you once said you are responsible for budgets for some number of people, do you think gov salaries are equivalent to those private business? How does job security figure in to the equation?

I'm wondering if there might be a way to establish some kind of fixed overhead percentage target- so for example, administration cost would not exceed, say, 5% of teacher salaries or whatever number.


I hear horror stories from family members who work in county and state government about the near complete impossibility of firing someone because of union rules - no matter how bad a job they do. Of course that's in CA so who knows, how do you find that aspect of government?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:56:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'L')udi, which would you prefer, prices so high that government assistance checks won’t buy a month’s worth of food or fewer people on government assistance?


That looks like a false dilemma.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 17:59:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'I') will be happy if there is no significant legislation that passes from either the Repubs or the Dems over the next two years. Unlike some others on this board, I prefer local solutions and people figuring out for themselves how to build their own personal lifeboat.



So basically "paddle your own canoe or die" is your philosophy?

I also like local solutions but folks don't post much about them here on po.com. :|
Ludi
 
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 18:03:34

I've started a thread where you-all can tell us how you're going to help your community this winter:

how-will-you-be-helping-your-community-this-winter-t59982.html

I expect to see a nice fat post from every conservative who bitches about the Welfare State.
Ludi
 

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 18:30:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', ' ')Just WHAT can the common man do against "THE SYSTEM".?




Stop supporting it?

(General strike)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Mesuge » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 18:37:45

Gas> England? With 5security cameras per square meter.., not much can be done. Seriously, in terms of politics you simply have to wait for more chaos, the current system has got such a momentum, most of the public is still highjacked in gullible "me worry?" ultra-sheeple mode, it's a waste of time/energy to organize 3rd parties and what have you at the moment.

At the minimum scan local/national politics, if there is meaningfull strike (cog in the machine), e.g. blocking traffics, shutdown of TV studio, GMO facility protest, take part in it, make contacts. Don't waste time on silly protests with gatekeeping "fake-lefty" shills as speakers.

On the personal, daily action level, there is plenty tips around here, stop paying into that freakin' system starting with: axing cable TV, axing fixed phone line, get IP phone with net connection only, buy at local/agro markets (limit frequent big box shopping visits), bicycle short errands, ..

One of the greatest schemes how the system is raping people in daylight, is this con of atomization of society, there are very few multigenerational families these days, everybody has got own flat/house. This is crazy let alone from utility, taxes, enviro standpoint. On the other hand, more people under one roof, is often times not easy to manage, bills, cleaning, personal issues, ..

Try brainstorm about possible barter options in your hood, what are your skills and hobbies in this regard, perhaps you can grow some veggies, perhaps you can paint nice portraits, repair/refurb "antiques", ..
Last edited by Mesuge on Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:01:53, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Oakley » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:20:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fiddlerdave', ' ')The whole reason Social Security was started was because of the terrible plight of the elderly


I guess conservatives think SS was invented even though it wasn't needed - there were no poor people in the US because they were all being taken care of by private charity. But the guvmint decided to implement the program anyway, thereby creating poor people.


You guys actually believe your own propaganda despite the reality.

Here is an article to the contrary:

http://www.fff.org/comment/com0904s.asp

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here never was a popular demand for Social Security, even during the Great Depression. Few Americans were interested in the kind of government-run program that the German politician Otto von Bismarck had introduced in Europe. According to Social Security expert Carolyn Weaver, author of The Crisis in Social Security, in 1929 about 95 percent of senior citizens were self-supporting — an increasing number had private pension plans or annuities. Many seniors were helped out by family and friends.


I remember reading an article years ago by Walter Williams, the noted economist, where he described that if a person worked a normal work life, taking what he was forced to contribute to Social Security and instead contributed it to a private fund earning 5% a year, that he would retire with twice the benefit as Social Security paid him and have $500,000 to leave to his heirs to boot.

Social Security is a Ponzi scheme where the retirees are paid with contributions by the newcomers. There is no actuarially sound fund set aside to pay benefits; in reality there is nothing set aside at all because the federal government has taken (borrowed) any excess contributions and already spent them on general government spending. Eventually, as there are not enough new suckers to fund the requirements of the system it will collapse and then all dependent on it will suffer cruel harm. It encouraged people to abandon private retirement plans because they thought they would get a Social Security check, so they instead spent rather than saved and this source of capital funding decreased. There was nothing kind or effective that came from this government take over of retirement funding.

Thee is nothing kind or effective that comes from government charity (welfare) either. Compulsory charity destroys empathy; it creates resentment on the part of those forced to support others. It makes those receiving benefits dependent, and after a generation or two, takes away their ability to take care of themselves (just like a long term prisoner cannot deal with freedom on release from prison). Much of what is taken from some to be given to others is kept in the administration process. It encourages fraud and a sense of entitlement. In fact the system is theft itself, taking through force what belongs to one person and giving it to another.

Who do you think will be those who suffer the most as the economic pie contracts again and again under the weight of declining energy? Those most dependent on the system will the one out in the cold, figuratively and literally.

If you have any compassion for your fellow man, I suggest you abandon your support of the Republican/Democrat Party of plunder and control and instead do what you can to reduce government to a shadow of its present self. Government is nothing more than force, and should only be used for what a individual can legitimately use force, i.e., self defense. Any other government force is an immoral act of aggression.
"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence" Thomas H Huxley
Oakley
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon 11 May 2009, 01:23:22
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby dolanbaker » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:36:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', ' ')Just WHAT can the common man do against "THE SYSTEM".?




Stop supporting it?


For those that can.. The best course of action is to bypass the banking system, get paid in cash and use cash for everything, no credit (debt) cards or anything that uses the banks.

It's the banking sector and those behind it that (mainly) caused this mess in the first place.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.:Anonymous
Our whole economy is based on planned obsolescence.
Hungrymoggy "I am now predicting that Europe will NUKE ITSELF sometime in the first week of January"
User avatar
dolanbaker
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3855
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2010, 10:38:47
Location: Éire
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Ludi » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:46:08

That's good advice, dolanbaker. Also we can become active in the Sharing or Gift Economy, and bypass money altogether.
Ludi
 

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby Plantagenet » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:53:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', '
')It's the banking sector and those behind it that (mainly) caused this mess in the first place.


You can't have a speculative bubble unless you've got people driving up the price of an asset by speculating and purchasing the asset.....this is true even for houses.

The banks didn't buy the overpriced houses.......millions of people bought the overpriced houses and even refinanced their existing homes to take out cash...and every single one of them bought on the assumption that housing prices would continue to rise.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: QE2 may sentence 60 million in US to cold and hungry win

Postby vision-master » Sat 06 Nov 2010, 19:55:48

So, I hear you own 5 miles of riverfront?
vision-master
 

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests