Nope, sorry, those things don't fit into the civilizational economics definitions of "capital" and "labor."
Put on YOUR thinking cap. Really.
capital
1. Cash or goods used to generate income either by investing in a business or a different income property.
2. The net worth of a business; that is, the amount by which its assets exceed its liabilities.
3. The money, property, and other valuables which collectively represent the wealth of an individual or business.
labor/work
1. General: Situation where a recurring or one-time task is performed.
2. Contracting: Entire scope of a project encompassing all people, equipment, material, and other goods and services required to fulfill the contractor's obligations under a contract.
wealth
3. Economics: Total of all assets of an economic unit that generate current income or have the potential to generate future income. It includes natural resources and human capital but generally excludes money and securities because the represent only claims to wealth. Two common types of economic wealth are (1) Monetary wealth: anything that can be bought and sold, for which there is market and hence a price. The market price, however, reflects only the commodity price and not necessarily its value. For example, water is essential for human existence but is usually very cheap. (2) Non-monetary wealth: things which depend on scarce resources, and for which there is demand, but are not bought and sold in a market and hence have no price. Examples are education, health, and defense.
The folks I'm talking about don't have "labor" in the usual sense, any more than a wolf or a deer has "labor." They don't have "capital" because they don't have property or businesses. They don't have "wealth" because they don't have money or markets.