Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Oil discussed on "Lou Dobbs Tonight"

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Oil discussed on "Lou Dobbs Tonight"

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 15 Aug 2004, 10:49:42

This a CNN show, formerly Moneyline. News with a sort of business spin.

From the Aug. 13 transcript (emphasis mine):

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'K')ITTY PILGRIM (host):
Let's move on to oil. And oil really gyrated a lot this week on this news. The great worry is the insurgents will continue to attack the oil pipelines, although oil exports are flowing normally through the south at this point. Jim, your assessment on what this means for business.

JIM ELLIS (Chief of Correspondents for Business Week): Well, there's a lot going on in the oil markets right now. I mean, there's the real uncertainty of what's going on with Iraq and whether we're going to be able to continue the transmission of oils we've been doing so far.

Venezuela, there's an election there that's making a lot of instability to the markets. And also, the continuing drama in Russia because of Yukos, and the government trying to take over one of the largest oil producers there. It means $46 a barrel oil.

What that means is that the recovery, it's still rather fragile, could be sort of, snuffed out and also means that the administration, which wants confidence to be high, has a hard time keeping that up. At the same time the people see the oil bills going up.

RON BROWNSTEIN (Political Correspondent for the Los Angeles Times): That's really the double wave politically. On the one hand, you have the oil prices themselves, the gas prices that people experience, and then you also have the question of what this is doing to the overall growth numbers: the job creation numbers and how that sort of rebounds on the president.

You know, I have been struck all year how much resonance John Kerry and other Democrats have received from their audiences, at least, on the idea of increasing energy independence. The President, obviously makes a different argument about increasing domestic production, but this whole question of whether our national security is overly compromised by reliance on Mideast oil, is one that I do think really does hit a lot of American voters.

PILGRIM: Well, a very compelling argument. Oil up $10 since the beginning of this year. Karen?

KAREN TUMULTY (National Political Correspondent for Time Magazine): Then of course, this week we saw the Saudis announce that they were going to open up the spigot and this was what everyone thought could possibly slow this increase down. And all we saw was it jump up even faster.

It does appear increasingly like the entire economic recovery could be completely bound up in these oil prices. And even as the news in the Middle East is looking more dire, when you talk to voters, you do find that their top concern by a long shot remains the economy.


More and more, I think awareness of peak oil is reaching critical mass...
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Lou Dobbs on energy and education

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 11 May 2005, 00:15:49

CNN's Lou Dobbs had a segment on energy tonight. A different take. He had Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson as a guest on his show. She is a physicist, and the current president of Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute. (A very geeky engineering school, and my alma mater.) Dobbs is apparently hoping to get American kids excited about math and science again, like in the days of the space race. Only this time, instead of trying to put a man on the moon, we'd be trying to solve our energy problem.

Unfortunately, Dr. Jackson didn't really have any answers as to how we'd accomplish this.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Lou Dobbs on energy and education

Unread postby Clouseau2 » Wed 11 May 2005, 01:07:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'U')nfortunately, Dr. Jackson didn't really have any answers as to how we'd accomplish this.


Hopefully some clever scientists will devise a solution that has the depolymerization of corrupt politicians as an element. Now there's an inexhaustable supply!
User avatar
Clouseau2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, CA

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Wed 11 May 2005, 12:20:04

Lou Dobbs is the only news program that I can stand to watch. Although I do take issue on some of his points, he does seem to care about what the average person goes through.

Is he beating that useful idiot O'Reilley in the ratings yet?
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 11 May 2005, 13:09:12

I think O'Lie-ly is up against Paula Zahn, not Lou Dobbs.

I like Dobbs, too. He's the only one in the so-called liberal media who really takes the workers' side. I wish he'd take a serious look at peak oil. I think he's intelligent enough to see how big the problem really is.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

No acceptable solutions now..

Unread postby lee » Wed 11 May 2005, 13:27:07

That is to say, the solutions exist, we're just
not hearing about them because they aren't
acceptable under the current political climate.

When hardship comes to the middle class, then
people will be willing to listen to the physicists.
User avatar
lee
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri 10 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Wed 11 May 2005, 18:14:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') think O'Lie-ly is up against Paula Zahn, not Lou Dobbs.

I like Dobbs, too. He's the only one in the so-called liberal media who really takes the workers' side. I wish he'd take a serious look at peak oil. I think he's intelligent enough to see how big the problem really is.


And he's listened to by those in the corporate world.
How about an organized email compaign to Lou Dobbs???
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Thu 12 May 2005, 14:57:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') think O'Lie-ly is up against Paula Zahn, not Lou Dobbs.

I like Dobbs, too. He's the only one in the so-called liberal media who really takes the workers' side. I wish he'd take a serious look at peak oil. I think he's intelligent enough to see how big the problem really is.


Lou Dobbs is a conservative Republican, however. I remember his show had guests that would rip into Bill Clinton back in the day. Perhaps he feels he cannot maintain a straight face by reading RNC propaganda coming off a teleprompter like the useful idiots at Fox do.

It doesn't matter his reasons, if he can get the pro-business Republicans and the pro-open borders Democrats all worked up, then he must doing at least something right.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 12 May 2005, 20:05:15

Guess I'm truely alone on this website. I'm a pro-open borders pro business type of guy that thinks that Lou Dobbs is a ratings opportunist that decided to put basic Ricardian laws of comparative advantage out of mind for the sake of populism.

So is everyone here an isolationalist socialist then?
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Fri 13 May 2005, 09:35:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'G')uess I'm truely alone on this website. I'm a pro-open borders pro business type of guy that thinks that Lou Dobbs is a ratings opportunist that decided to put basic Ricardian laws of comparative advantage out of mind for the sake of populism.

So is everyone here an isolationalist socialist then?


The libertarian argument in favor of open borders means political and economic suicide for the pro-business side of society. The libertarians argue that it's OK to have open borders because a libertarian government does not believe in providing welfare or social services. The problem is is that these new immigrants VOTE. And they vote SOCIALIST. Case in point California--once a reliable Republican state in Presidential elections, it now votes solidly Democrat because of it's increasing Mexican population. This population is moving to New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado as well, and in about 10 years from now these "R" states will be "D".

I have no problem with trade with other countries which have similar economic and social structures. Perhaps there should be an OECD trade bloc. The US is committing economic suicide as it continues to trade with countries where people are paid 12 cents an hour. The tax base is eroding, and very soon there will longer be a first world market to sell their products to.

I accuse big business of being corporate welfare whore socialists. They want to hire cheap labour ("undocumented workers" -- what a laughable term!) and they don't care if the government has to pay for their social services. In a sense, the "undocumented workers" are a form of subsidized labour, at the expense of the middle class taxpayer.

My politics are socially conservative and pro-middle class. I don't give a sh*t for the welfare whores of either the lower or the upper classes. Both of them are like vultures trying to get first dibs on the rotting corpse of middle class man. Honestly, I think that middle class man has had enough. He should simply go on strike and become a burden to society by stealing, collecting welfare and performing acts of sedition against the state. Atlas shrugs. Man bites dog. No more Mr. Nice Guy.

You should be thankful that Lou Dobbs provides an outlet for the common man to express his frustrations. Better Lou Dobbs than someone like Adolph Hitler. When there's economic collapse, the politics of the extreme left or the extreme right become mainstream.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Doly » Fri 13 May 2005, 09:48:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MagnoliaFan', '
')My politics are socially conservative and pro-middle class. I don't give a sh*t for the welfare whores of either the lower or the upper classes. Both of them are like vultures trying to get first dibs on the rotting corpse of middle class man. Honestly, I think that middle class man has had enough. He should simply go on strike and become a burden to society by stealing, collecting welfare and performing acts of sedition against the state.


Funny, how everybody believes that the world rest on their shoulders. The middle class believes they make the world go round. The lower class believes that the world couldn't possibly work without them (and they're right, who cleans up the rubbish and do all those jobs that the middle class won't do?). The upper class believes the rest couldn't organize themselves without help (probably correct as well, seeing how sheepish is the vast majority of people).

One good thing about PO is that we're finally going to figure out who was essential and who isn't. And there may be a few surprises. After all, the middle class is a fairly recent invention.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Fri 13 May 2005, 10:59:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'F')unny, how everybody believes that the world rest on their shoulders. The middle class believes they make the world go round. The lower class believes that the world couldn't possibly work without them (and they're right, who cleans up the rubbish and do all those jobs that the middle class won't do?). The upper class believes the rest couldn't organize themselves without help (probably correct as well, seeing how sheepish is the vast majority of people).


"For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada" ... translated from Spanish to English this means "For the race, everything. For those outside the race, nothing." This is the mantra for MECHA, a radical Mexican organization in the US.

Perhaps middle class man should apply that to himself as well, but he doesn't. He keeps believing that by voting Republican (or Democrat in protest) that they will make the bad things go away. You can't vote your way out of this mess.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne good thing about PO is that we're finally going to figure out who was essential and who isn't. And there may be a few surprises. After all, the middle class is a fairly recent invention.


Peak oil is going to turn Western Man from being a fat, lazy complacent slob into a lean, mean, fighting machine. Of course, 90% of his numbers will die off but I'm for quality--not quanity.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby holmes » Fri 13 May 2005, 11:07:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'G')uess I'm truely alone on this website. I'm a pro-open borders pro business type of guy that thinks that Lou Dobbs is a ratings opportunist that decided to put basic Ricardian laws of comparative advantage out of mind for the sake of populism.

So is everyone here an isolationalist socialist then?


you white man speak with fork tongue. Are you a traitor? Are you miraculously creating natural resources where there are none? are you willing to give your life sustaining resources over to 500% over replacement level breeders? Mafias? If you are Mexico and latin America are ideal for you. Howeer i would assume you would robbed and murdered and left in a shanty towns ditch after only a few weeks. But hey keep them borders open for Profit.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby JoeW » Fri 13 May 2005, 11:54:25

Here's the problem with capitalism...

Take a look at a simple example--the game of monopoly. Everyone competes to buy up the capital as quickly as possible, and when it has all been bought up, all the players are pretty much at the mercy of fate, and there can be only one winner. The rest are losers.

The US is slowly becoming more and more like that model of capitalism--where the winners slowly continue to acquire capital, while the losers slowly approach a state of servitude to the winners (think 40-yr mortgages and 7-yr car loans...the terms keep getting longer and longer, don't they?). Wages are stagnating in an environment of increasing inflation.

The winning capitalists don't have to do anything at all to contribute to production. They can do whatever they want, whenever they want, and never have to work for any of it. Their children, grandchildren, etc. will be gifted with the same experience.

I am not saying that this is right or wrong, but this is the case. Perhaps everyone gets what they deserve, or perhaps not. In the end, as anyone who has played monopoly knows, the losers sometimes become quite upset with the winners, perhaps out of envy or frustration. When the game never ends and it is for real, imagine how much more upset they might get. It is a dangerous situation.
User avatar
JoeW
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Pit of Despair


Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron