Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 16:15:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')n spite of being pushed down by all those taxes.


Yes, but you still haven't addressed this - my 3 data points from life.
income/tax
20k, 1k
80k, 8k
400k, 160k

When I was in the "poor" class, I was taxed at 5%.
I paid a mere 10% when I was squarely in the middle class.
When I was "rich" (oh brother), I paid more in taxes than everybody else on my street, combined, and it was about 40% of what I made.

How can those numbers be viewed as anything other than the "rich" carrying the lion's share while the "middle class" and "poor" skate with extremely low taxes?
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby dsula » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 16:22:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', '
')How can those numbers be viewed as anything other than the "rich" carrying the lion's share while the "middle class" and "poor" skate with extremely low taxes?


Of course it's unfair. Fair would be flat rate (not flat percentage, but flat amount). Like $10k/year.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 16:32:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', 'S')orry to break your heart dude, but by any measure of net worth, I am part of the top 5%.
Regarding income, I was part of the top 1% until I begged out of the system.

And no, I don't take much personally, so no worries.

My apologies. I'm actually kind of excited that one of the elite, top 5% of our ruling class is posting here at PO.com (to say nothing of the fact that you personally addressed me as "dude").

However, I do find it odd that you're taking time out of your day to voice your disapproval over subsidized housing. Shouldn't you be fighting to make the repeal of the death tax permanent (since real wealth is, apparently, generational).


Death tax is excluded from first mill, but that's only on non-excluded items. Fairly easy to get around in small amounts - it's the folks who build multi-million dollar businesses who mostly get screwed on this.

Not lobbying for anything man.

Just trying to make the following point - - -

It's a complete fabrication that "poor" people are getting raked over the coals with regard to taxes.
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 16:34:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', '
')How can those numbers be viewed as anything other than the "rich" carrying the lion's share while the "middle class" and "poor" skate with extremely low taxes?


Of course it's unfair. Fair would be flat rate (not flat percentage, but flat amount). Like $10k/year.


Absolutely. It's funny how Americans are so brain washed that they generally believe that a "flat tax" would be fair where the guy working 10 hours a week because that's all he wants to work pays 500 bucks in taxes and the guy next to him working 80 hours a week pays 4,000 a year.

There's this delusion out there that the mystic group known as "the rich" are making out. What a load.
But like I said, all will be clear in about 50 years. Then, when the "poor" of that post-oil age look back at the "poor" of today, they'll be envious of how good the "poor" of today have it.
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Sixstrings » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 17:26:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '[')b]I would rather live in a teepee. Or a groovy housebout made from recycled stuff. Or a salvaged yacht. etc. etc. The appalling thing here is the lack of imagination, IMO.


It's not that easy, SeaGypsy. In most communities in the US, even if a poor person somehow comes into enough money to buy land and keep up the taxes they still can't just pitch a tent. There are zoning restrictions and building codes regulating what passes as a "habitable" dwelling (the government would rather you be on the street than live in a house that's not up to code).

And the reality is that people facing homelessness are flat broke and can't buy land even if they were allowed to pitch a tent or erect a shack. Neither can they pitch a tent anywhere else.. they have to hide behind the bushes on vacant land, their camps repeatedly broken up by law enforcement. In my town, it's illegal to sleep in public and yet we only have one small homeless shelter that lets people stay just two nights a week -- so how are they supposed to sleep if you can't sleep in public?
Last edited by Sixstrings on Thu 12 Aug 2010, 17:37:47, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Sixstrings » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 17:36:40

Little update..

I heard on the news that the last waiting list open call was in 2002, and at that time 2400 people came out. Now in 2010 30,000 people showed up. So clearly, what's going on now is NOT the usual generational poverty. We're in an economic Depression, the lower classes are devastated and facing homelessness, and nobody wants to admit it.

Also heard on the same news story that this 30,000 person long waiting list is for only 500 units! And those are occupied, remember this is just a waiting list so people will have to wait years and years as other families live out their lives and eventually move out.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 18:28:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'L')ittle update..

I heard on the news that the last waiting list open call was in 2002, and at that time 2400 people came out. Now in 2010 30,000 people showed up. So clearly, what's going on now is NOT the usual generational poverty. We're in an economic Depression, the lower classes are devastated and facing homelessness, and nobody wants to admit it.

Also heard on the same news story that this 30,000 person long waiting list is for only 500 units! And those are occupied, remember this is just a waiting list so people will have to wait years and years as other families live out their lives and eventually move out.


No doubt that this time IS different.
In a way this is very sad.
In a way this is very needed. These 30,000 people need to figure out - and the sooner the better - that the free ride is ending.
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 18:39:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'I')t's not that easy, SeaGypsy. In most communities . . . [t]here are zoning restrictions and building codes regulating what passes as a "habitable" dwelling (the government would rather you be on the street than live in a house that's not up to code).


Government sucks.
More government sucks more.
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby MarkJ » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:11:24

With about 13,000 applicants, and future closures, their chance of finding a public or private opening is slim to none.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are a total of 655 housing spots available -- 200 public housing units and 455 vouchers for rent assistance in private housing. East Point currently has five housing developments, but three of them will be closed or sold.


To add insult to injury, most of the 16 other housing authorities have closed their waiting lists, plus much of the public housing of the past was a failure, so it's been abandoned, or demolished in favor of housing vouchers.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ost of the 16 other local housing authorities in Atlanta have closed their waiting lists. But Section 8 vouchers are portable, so people flocked from across the city for a chance to receive housing aid.

Less public housing

Frank Alexander, a public housing specialist in the law school at Atlanta's Emory University, said the dramatic scenes in East Point on Wednesday were the result of three main factors.

Firstly, the massive spike in home foreclosures - or repossessions - over the past two years as a result of the sub-prime mortgage crisis has displaced large numbers of low income people.
Public housing in Brooklyn Across the US, high density public housing has been abandoned in favour of mixed-use schemes

Second, high levels of unemployment in the US are hampering people's ability to access housing.

And finally, policy changes that have occurred over the past two decades have decreased the amount of public housing available, and made it more difficult for very low income people to receive aid.

Mr Alexander says that in the 1990s, federal policy experts deemed the very large public housing projects that were characteristic of the 1960s and 1970s not to be a viable model.

"That model created very dense concentrations of individuals and families that had the greatest social service needs of services and the least amount of disposable income," Mr Alexander said.

"The housing conditions deteriorated rapidly in those large-scale projects. In many instances, there was a high degree of criminal activity and violence."

Cities such as Atlanta set about demolishing their inventory of publicly owned and occupied public housing, and shifted their focus to Section 8 vouchers and mixed-use housing, where housing aid recipients live alongside other tenants.
Lost in transition

That policy shift was combined with a devolution of authority over housing policy to local rather than federal authorities.

Municipalities, whose budgets were already squeezed, looked to find ways to save money. That made Section 8 vouchers more attractive than investing in publicly-owned housing.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

We are no longer serving those who have the greatest need or the lowest income.”

End Quote Frank Alexander Professor of Law, Emory University

In addition, assistance to low income people (over 60% of the median income level) rather than very low income people was more affordable to local authorities, who had to fork out less cash to cover the subsidies of the working poor than the unemployed.

Mr Alexander says that it is wise to acknowledge that large public housing projects did not create healthy living environments.

But he says an important, under-served population has been lost in the transition: "We are no longer serving those who have the greatest need or the lowest income."

Mr Fraser agrees: "Concentrated poverty has multiplicative negatives. Residents have fewer services like grocery stories and pharmacies. Crime can be higher as people prey on these areas."

But with those high-density projects demolished, more and more of the very poorest people are left out in the cold.

Mr Fraser worries that unless the economy improves or federal authorities address the crisis of public housing, Wednesday's scenes in Atlanta will be replicated across the country.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby FairMaiden » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:17:31

I am direct recipient of Canadian housing support. This generational poverty drivel is complete bull.

My mother has a Grade 7 education bc her old world parents didn't think women needed an education. They also threw her out at 14 (for playing baseball, how unlady like). She worked FT at 14 to support herself and without any gov't assistance "pulled up her bootstraps". She married at 18 to an alcoholic. She found herself at 30 yrs old unemployed, uneducated and with 3 children.

She found a low paying job (what else could she find in her situation). They condemned the house she was renting and she needed to find a place for her and the 3 kids. She found a crappy 1 bdrm apt. My brother & sister shared the room, I had a crib in the corner of the living room and mom slept on fold out couch. We lived there 5 yrs. Within 1 year we had qualified for housing assistance and were given an apt in another town. The hard part was moving away from all our friends but my brother & sister were old enough to go back to our other town (in fact, my brother and I currently live there). We lived in a gov't sponsored apt for 3 yrs. My mother saved every penny - even walking 45 mins to work when my brother or sister needed the car. She saved up enough money to buy into a coop. During the 3 yrs, I developed severe breathing problems bc there was mould growing on the walls in my room.

But we got the chance we needed and we made the most of it. In Canada, it is relatively easy to find gov't sponsored housing. Harder in the city where 600 sqft condos sell for $600-700K...but in the suburbs it's easier. You in live a gov't owned apt or t/home and pay 25% of income as rent.

I am happy to say that all of my siblings and I have post secondary education and are home owners.

My 2 best friends from the housing project also have post secondary education and are home owners. One of them had a drug problem from age 18-22 but she got it together and has had no slips for 16 yrs.

My husband lived next door to a housing project and he had 2 friends from there. 1 has post secondary education and is a home owner. The other lives in a rented house and has a blue collar job w/only a HS education.

Our housing projects are mixed into regular suburban neighbourhoods. Sometimes you might even have an apt in buildings or complexes that are privately owned but the gov't purchased units. In our case, we lived in a building that was gov't owned in a complex w/privately owned buildings.

The reason a lot of ppl on reserves live in property is primarily bc there are no jobs on the reserve. Also, the band leaders do not equitably distribute the band's wealth. My father was First Nations so I also have experience with that...but my post is long enough.

My mother now owns a modest home in a retirement town. I am happy to report that she is very happy :-D
User avatar
FairMaiden
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:27:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FairMaiden', 'I') am direct recipient of Canadian housing support. This generational poverty drivel is complete bull.


Canada doesn't have quite the same history as the American South.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:29:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', 'J')ust trying to make the following point - - -
It's a complete fabrication that "poor" people are getting raked over the coals with regard to taxes.

You better get Warren some message discipline. He has apparently gone rogue.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')arren E. Buffett was his usual folksy self Tuesday night at a fundraiser for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as he slammed a system that allows the very rich to pay taxes at a lower rate than the middle class.

Buffett cited himself, the third-richest person in the world, as an example. Last year, Buffett said, he was taxed at 17.7 percent on his taxable income of more than $46 million. His receptionist was taxed at about 30 percent.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:38:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', '
')Buffett cited himself, the third-richest person in the world, as an example. Last year, Buffett said, he was taxed at 17.7 percent on his taxable income of more than $46 million. His receptionist was taxed at about 30 percent.


One hopes Warren Buffet's receptionist is not "poor." Probably more like "middle class." I don't think anyone is arguing the poor are paying too many taxes. Some of the upper class seem to not be paying quite enough compared to some of the middle classes. Many corporations pay little or no income taxes.


http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/ ... ncome-tax/
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 20:07:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') don't think anyone is arguing the poor are paying too many taxes.

Buffett said that was despite the fact that he was not trying to avoid paying higher taxes. "I don't have a tax shelter," he said. And he challenged Congress and his audience to see what the people who "clean our offices" are taxed, to loud applause.

Good catch Ludi- maybe his point was that the poor were paying too little.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 20:17:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', 'm')aybe his point was that the poor were paying too little.


Expatriot seems to think someone was saying the poor are taxed too much. Not sure where he got that. :?:

My point was the rich are certainly not getting pushed down to the level of the poor if the rich can continually increase wealth disparity in spite of paying "high taxes." In a truly leveling society of the kind the socialists are accused of wanting and supposedly the US is becoming (because of handouts like free housing), there would be little or no wealth disparity. But that's not what we're seeing in the US. We're seeing the rich getting richer and the rest going to the dogs. Or maybe all the rest of us non-rich, even the middle class, are just suddenly getting really lazy and refusing to keep our jobs because going on the dole is so much more rewarding?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 20:39:03

There are many kinds of taxes.

If most of your income is in the form of paid salary, you pay MUCH higher taxes than someone whose income comes from investments and dividends.

The top dividend tax rate is 15% so if you collect a million dollars a year from the dividends on your investments, you'll pay $150,000 in federal taxes (15%).

If you earn a million dollars a year in salary, you'll pay $327,644 in income taxes plus $21,122 in payroll taxes, for a total of $348,766 in federal taxes. (34.88%)

So there's a huge gap between the old rich and the aspiring rich.

The reason Warren Buffet pays so little in taxes is that virtually all of his income is in the form of dividends, capital gains, and interest.

The solution isn't to raise income taxes, that would just make the gap between professionals and the Warren Buffets of the world even larger. The solution is to raise investment taxes so they more closely match income tax rates.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Expatriot » Thu 12 Aug 2010, 22:48:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', ' ')The solution is to raise investment taxes so they more closely match income tax rates.


We differ on this.

I think the solution is to shrink the federal govt by 95% and go back to the federal tax scheme in place in 1912.
User avatar
Expatriot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2010, 11:57:52
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Fri 13 Aug 2010, 00:43:43

Expatriot,

Considering that interest payments alone are around 7% of federal spending, a 95% reduction in federal government spending means debt default and anarchy. Lovely.

As for replacing taxes with import tariffs, we only import $2.2 trillion worth of stuff a year. You would need an 80% tariff just to replace current revenue, to say nothing of the impact on trade that kind of tariff would bring.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby IslandCrow » Fri 13 Aug 2010, 02:02:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'T')he solution isn't to raise income taxes, that would just make the gap between professionals and the Warren Buffets of the world even larger. The solution is to raise investment taxes so they more closely match income tax rates.


+100

The figures are different here in Finland (actually the gap is narrower), but the principle is the same:- you are taxed more if you are working than if you are already rich and live off interest/dividends etc.
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: Big Brouhaha over Section 8 vouchers in Atlanta

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 13 Aug 2010, 02:09:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Expatriot', '
')
How can those numbers be viewed as anything other than the "rich" carrying the lion's share while the "middle class" and "poor" skate with extremely low taxes?


Expatriot, the rich had always paid "the lion share" of any tax base simply because they benefit from the state more than anybody else. You would not be able to be rich in the first place if there are were no society around you . The state itself exists to protect the rich from the poor. Why would the poor pay monies to protect the rich ? Boggles my mind. So you pay to the state , and the state, through a combination of whips and carrots aka prisons and handouts makes sure the poor dont kill the rich ( or at least not all of them simultaneously).
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron