Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Main Doomer Fallacy

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 17:07:40

Everyone can see how virtually every Science/Technology thread gets trashed on PeakOil.com. The doom crowd mostly cries, "PO Doom is inevitable; get that unrealistic crap (Science & Technology) off our computer screens; it's dangerous and misleading"!

But Science & Technology is the primary way that human society deals with problems and crises. Therefore, it is interesting to watch the scientific response to our energy/GW problems. And we are indeed seeing a growing stream of stories related to various energy/climate innovations and studies. This is a process where some discoveries will prove extremely useful and beneficial, while others will fall by the wayside. This is all normal and natural.

Doomers, however, want human beings to act in ways that are totally contrary to their nature. It's just ridiculous to expect humanity to NOT use Sci/Tech - because this of way solving problems is the MAIN feature of people. Doomers, in effect, are demanding that people NOT BE people. That's nonsense.

The only way that people will ever act like doomers want them to act is if peak oil becomes an indisputable reality NOW - and this reality totally overwhelms any inventive, innovative or adaptive ways of dealing with it. But this hasn't happened at all; it isn't happening. At this point, the certainty of PO apocalypse is merely a belief. Few people are worried about any apocalypse outside of sites like this one. There are many, many ideas and options for powering our global civilization. And they are being explored in earnest now. In the meantime, Oil & Gas isn't going away anytime soon.

You can never accurately predict the future. The world is simply too chaotic a place. Anything can happen. We are definitely NOT at the End of All Knowledge (another ridiculous assumption that doomers would have you believe). So while you cannot accurately predict PO doom; you also cannot accurately predict something like The Technological Singularity. You can only look at current trends. And one of the most interesting, accelerating trends to watch is Sci/Tech.

I'd like to be able to post threads along Sci/Tech lines without having every single one of them attacked. Human Beings are what they are. They will do what they have evolved to do. There's no point in attacking human Sci/Tech. It's bound to happen.
Carlhole
 

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Sixstrings » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 18:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')b]I'd like to be able to post threads along Sci/Tech lines without having every single one of them attacked. Human Beings are what they are. They will do what they have evolved to do. There's no point in attacking human Sci/Tech. It's bound to happen.


I don't see a problem with the cornucopian posts, as long as it's not too much and overwhelms everything else. Fact is, there's a million stories out there along the lines of "jet fuel made from plants." You can go back into the archives of Popular Science and read about all kinds of amazing future tech that never came to pass. So 99% of that stuff is pure fiction, and the real innovation is usually totally unexpected (that's why it's innovation -- it's new, never existed before, and was unexpected).

So maybe just don't post too much of the "science miracle of the week" stuff. People need to be polite, but most folks on here are doomers so you can't expect them to not have a strong opinion about "jet fuel made from plants" saving humanity.

And I agree with you about the artificial intelligence stuff, but it's just too far out into the future to discuss much on this forum. Let's make a deal on the AI.. no more discussion about it until a software program becomes intelligent enough to post on this forum and tell everyone how it's going to save the world. ;)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby cipi604 » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 19:01:45

There are some doomers, like me for example, that are not afraid of technology, they understand it, they use it, they like it, they need it on a daily basis. It is this thing, called knowledge, that makes me a doomer.
Technology ain't magic, and the peak oil event ain't just a bad dream. Limits apply no matter what.
User avatar
cipi604
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 19:21:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cipi604', 'T')here are some doomers, like me for example, that are not afraid of technology, they understand it, they use it, they like it, they need it on a daily basis. It is this thing, called knowledge, that makes me a doomer.
Technology ain't magic, and the peak oil event ain't just a bad dream. Limits apply no matter what.


"Knowledge is doom". You know, there is just so much wrong with that statement I don't even know where to begin. Sounds like you've been reading too much Genesis or something. The future and its limits is never certain. What you are showing is your belief about the future.

What if NIF comes out this year with very positive news to report laser inertial fusion? The stock doomer response claims to know the future. They say simply, "Fusion will always be the energy of the future" . And if such news meant that energy itself was not going to be the imminent problem that doomers yearn for, then they always back-off to climate/environment/overpopulation, etc. It's just a doom mindset. You only find it on sites like this one.

What's more, doomers get really cranky if you don't go along with their beliefs. They just about want to burn you at the stake if you dare protest their precious Olduvai Gorge.
Carlhole
 

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Oakley » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 19:44:03

I think of technology as being knowledge applied to resources. For a considerable part of human history there were large quantities of resources, but there was not knowledge of how to exploit them, hence we did not have technology. If you have knowledge but inadequate resources upon which to apply this knowledge, you don't have technology; you just have knowledge, and even that knowledge will disappear from disuse.

So it is a fantasy to think that technology is some magic that will bail us out. It does not exist absent resources. Technology has been a function of energy.

We do have a considerable amount of knowledge of energy that leads to a reasonable estimate that we will be forced to live in the future on progressively smaller and smaller quantities of energy; unless there is some dramatic new discovery of energy, I think these estimates should materialize and economic contraction is more likely than a continuation of economic expansion.
"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence" Thomas H Huxley
Oakley
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon 11 May 2009, 01:23:22

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Pops » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 20:45:32

I searched "fusion" on po.com and got 3256 hits - 70 posts by Carlhole - is it working yet, carl?

I think the whole point of a site like po - and it's attraction to it's small group, is that 99% of the population believes, just like you carl, that the road goes on forever and the party never ends. They believe in Better Living Through Chemistry; Always Low Prices; You're In Good Hands and I'm Worth It. This site is for the few who, I guess, wonder what might happen if the PR is just spin. I read most of the tech articles, I post tech articles in the news most every day - mostly stuff about tech that's made it beyond the lab to the real world though...

“The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.”


I spent some time digging these up last year so I'm gonna recycle them just for you carl:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')"By 2000, the machines will be producing so much that everyone in the U.S. will, in effect, be independently wealthy."
Time Magazine,1966

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd for the tourist who really wants to get away from it all, safaris in Vietnam
Newsweek, predicting popular holidays for the late 1960s.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he basic questions of design, material and shielding, in combining a nuclear reactor with a home boiler and cooling unit, no longer are problems... The system would heat and cool a home, provide unlimited household hot water, and melt the snow from sidewalks and driveways. All that could be done for six years on a single charge of fissionable material costing about $300
Robert Ferry, executive of the U.S. Institute of Boiler and Radiator Manufacturers, 1955.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e will bury you.
Nikita Krushchev, Soviet Premier, predicting Soviet communism will win over U.S. capitalism, 1958.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;A dynamic new spirit enlivens the "City of Tomorrow." People, vehicles, goods — even some of the sidewalks — are moving. The city, cured of its traffic ills is reborn..."
"Man turns ice-clad Antarctica into a global weather center and probes its frozen wastes for resources needed by a growing world population."
"...[T]urbine-driven environmental cars, promise new heights of comfort and convenience in automatic motoring."
"On earth, automatic highways pierce the mountain barriers and turn the highlands into holiday hideaways. Resort hotels beneath the sea serve a new vacation playground."
From a GM pamphlet - 1964, Futurama II exhibit

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;Some day, the atom, or one of its currently little known by-products, may even drive your own personal car! Does the idea sound fantastic?
Motor Trend magazine, April 1951

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n all likelihood world inflation is over.International Monetary Fund Ceo, 1959.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his antitrust thing will blow over.Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o matter what happens, the U.S. Navy is not going to be caught napping.U.S. Secretary of Navy, December 4, 1941

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey couldn't hit an elephant at this dist-Last words of Gen. John Sedgwick, spoken as he looked out over the parapet at enemy lines during the Battle of Spotsylvania in 1864.

Gee, this kind of arrogant optimism sounds familiar.

Check this out: http://www.phrenicea.com/MOTORTREND121951page1.htm

NO DUSTING - In 1950, Popular Mechanics envisioned living rooms with drains in the floor, and all the furniture and curtains made of plastic so you could clean house by hosing everything down.

MELTING PLATES - In 1950 Popular Mechanics also forecast cheap plastic plates that would melt in hot water so housewives could "wash dirty dishes right down the drain."

CANDY MADE FROM UNDERWEAR - In 1967 Science Digest predicted that by 2000, "discarded rayon underwear will be bought by chemical factories and converted into candy."

SOLAR-POWERED CLOTHING - A 1981 book predicted solar-powered clothes that retain heat in the winter and coolness in the summer. People would be able to "press a button to formulate our clothing. ..do we want it to be opaque, should it give off steam, do we want it to light up, do we want it to glow in the dark?"

Nighttime joggers and cyclists will begin drinking a liquid that makes their skin glow bright green in the dark.
Kathie Lee Gifford will be straitjacketed and put in a mental institution after her morning show is canceled.


Elizabeth Taylor will marry Burt Reynolds.
Rising insurance costs will force the NFL to eliminate tackle football in favor of two-handed touch.
Fidel Castro will move to Beverly Hills after the overthrow of his government.
Oprah Winfrey will buy CBS and make it the first major network to "turn its back on TV violence."


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')The bomb will never go off. I speak as an expert in explosives.”Admiral William Leahy, US Atomic Bomb Project.


Sometimes it's best to either wait and see or at least consider the best information available now.


http://www.2spare.com/item_50221.aspx
http://futurismic.com/2007/10/27/top-87 ... he-future/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... 81851.html
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/10/ ... fty-years/
& cetera...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Pops » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 20:49:58

Wait a minute, the edible underwear thing did come true I think...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Xenophobe » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 20:58:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'E')veryone can see how virtually every Science/Technology thread gets trashed on PeakOil.com. The doom crowd mostly cries, "PO Doom is inevitable; get that unrealistic crap (Science & Technology) off our computer screens; it's dangerous and misleading"! ,


But they aren't necessarily trashed by everyone are they? It only takes a small minority to clog up threads with rebuttals and off-topic type stuff, so maybe its more of a fair moderation issue than a "thread trashing" issue?

Certainly the cornocopians populating TOD get smacked around pretty regularly, and are allowed to fight back and make fun of the more Doomerish crowd. They have a pretty healthy back and forth it seems like. Difficult format, but relatively fair, beyond the usual censorship anyway. Pretty heavy traffic since the Deepwater Horizon (and a bit over the top as well IMHO) which can be a good thing for the site owner, or a bad thing for anyone participating and thinking that they may be heard.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby mos6507 » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 21:01:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'W')ait a minute, the edible underwear thing did come true I think...


Man, Pops, you are on a roll lately. You make me wanna stop lurking. Oh, wait...
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby ian807 » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 22:55:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'W')ait a minute, the edible underwear thing did come true I think...

Don't ask. Don't tell.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby diemos » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 23:08:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'A')nything can happen.


No.

Would that that were true.

The world operates under some immutable and inescapable laws of physics and any solution you come up with has to fit within those laws. Many things are possible, but not anything. Assuming that the laws of physics are optional or revocable is the main cornucopian fallacy.
User avatar
diemos
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Xenophobe » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 23:23:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('diemos', ' ') Assuming that the laws of physics are optional or revocable is the main cornucopian fallacy.


That appears to be a strawman. Certainly while the topic of Jetson cars and infinite energy created by perpetual motion machines is mentioned occasionally, the advocacy of such technologies assigned to unnamed cornocopians is simply a safe way to guarantee that no one will refute the statement regardless of its accuracy.

I do not see cornocopian fantasies requiring the suspension of the laws of physics. I see the counter argument being primarily "there is enough", or "we will find more", or "we will use it more efficiently until the world is solar powered" or "economic fission will be here before natural gas runs out".
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 23:33:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'i')s it working yet, carl?

...and anyone who searches google for quotes about the imminent end of oil will find plenty of those too.

But really, YOU don't know that NIF will come up empty-handed regarding laser inertial fusion. Don't pretend that you DO know. You don't. The National Ignition Facility is conducting experiments so that we WILL know more. That is the whole point of Science. And this is why Science is interesting.

...And YOU don't know that engineers won't design a Thorium reactor (plenty of thorium out there), or a hybrid fission-fusion reactor. You only BELIEVE that those things are not possible or not economical or that people simply won't bother with them. You're the one with the beliefs. I'm the one who says that the future is unpredictable and anything can happen. I don't pretend to know the future. Don't put words in my mouth to the effect that I do.

All I have said is that plotting a curve of advancing science towards the so-called Singularity is no more or less error-prone than plotting a global oil depletion curve. One curve rises, the other falls.

You can't have an Olduvai Gorge as long as Science is racing ahead at break-neck acceleration. If you are an Olduvai Gorge doomer, make a prediction as to when we will see Peak Science and show your reasoning. But don't attack me for appreciating science and admitting to myself that I nor anyone else is clairvoyant.

I can point to impressive articles nearly every single day about science taking place in labs all over the world. These articles are interesting, relevant and often optimistic. I'm just sick of being attacked personally for posting them and making comments about them. It's stupid to ignore these subjects. Threads about them only make the site more interesting for anyone reading it.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Mon 09 Aug 2010, 23:56:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('diemos', ' ') Assuming that the laws of physics are optional or revocable is the main cornucopian fallacy.


That appears to be a strawman. Certainly while the topic of Jetson cars and infinite energy created by perpetual motion machines is mentioned occasionally, the advocacy of such technologies assigned to unnamed cornocopians is simply a safe way to guarantee that no one will refute the statement regardless of its accuracy.

I do not see cornocopian fantasies requiring the suspension of the laws of physics. I see the counter argument being primarily "there is enough", or "we will find more", or "we will use it more efficiently until the world is solar powered" or "economic fission will be here before natural gas runs out".


There's a whole variety of things that are being researched heavily now in the energy field. Some of these things are really ingenius. To be a doomer, you have to believe that none of this burgeoning research will produce much of anything at all. And plenty of times, I've actually seen doomer posts to the effect that we are at the End of All Knowledge, or that current research is a waste of money because nothing will come from it.

To me, that is the most ridiculous, ignorant argument I've ever heard. It's really just a ploy to get people to stop posting science and making positive comments about it here on the board. Because doomers really don't want there to be any discussion of Science here. Somehow, "discussing the mid-point of petroleum production" became "discussing the certainty of our imminent doom". Well there IS no certainty of it.

And then the doomers start throwing labels around like "Cornucopian". Well, I've never identified myself that way. All I've ever said is that in the face of broad crisis, the human animal responds using science & technology; there is no other primary response. And so it is interesting to watch it happen. And it is happening.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Quinny » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 00:31:00

I hope for some scientific discovery to power us to the future, but am not optimistic about it's imminent arrival. The maths just don't stack up.

I seem to recall a discussion on here about 'peak science' with some interesting points about decline in number of patent applications etc. Unfortunately my forum search option seems to have disappeared. Anyone recall this thread?
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Xenophobe » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 00:43:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')There's a whole variety of things that are being researched heavily now in the energy field. Some of these things are really ingenius. To be a doomer, you have to believe that none of this burgeoning research will produce much of anything at all.


In some cases, you have to believe not just that, but the first time a suburban housewife isn't allowed to put 40 gallons of gas into her Suburban she will decide to overthrow the government to live in a hunter-gatherer society of some sort in revolt.

Perhaps I am old fashioned, but whatever happened to the idea of taking a bus?
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Poordogabone » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 00:49:30

I agree with the post by "oakley".
When I speak about the incoming situation regarding po, I often hear that technology will save the day.
People seemed to confuse energy with technology, 95% of the energy that we use to run the world comes from non renewable sources, technology actually helps to accelerate the depletion of these resources. There is simply no pie in the sky out there to replace this incredible abundant, convenient, cheap and concentrated form of energy.We can get very good at using renewable forms of energy but it will always be expensive, inconvenient, cumbersome, in some cases unscalable and mostly a drop in the bucket when compare with the free lunch that we are used to. Technology is wonderful, I'm all for it but it won't save the day when it comes to energy depletion.
User avatar
Poordogabone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 01:02:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Poordogabone', 'T')here is simply no pie in the sky out there to replace this incredible abundant, convenient, cheap and concentrated form of energy.


Yeah, there is. It may not be as convenient as oil, but inconvenience does not amount to doom.

There will be a variety of technologies used.Thorium is simply energy-rich and abundant; a thorium reactor is already well-understood. At any rate, petroleum and coal will be around for decades while solar, wind, fission, fusion, biofuels, and everything else are continually developing. The black stuff ain't running out tomorrow.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 03:46:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')I'd like to be able to post threads along Sci/Tech lines without having every single one of them attacked. Human Beings are what they are. They will do what they have evolved to do.

There are plenty of forums out there, where you can discuss it and those who attack you will get a ban.
However here you are going to be in defense, so fight or flight.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here's no point in attacking human Sci/Tech. It's bound to happen.

There are equations without solutions.

It is possible (and in current situation very likely) that no amount of scientific innovation can solve our developing problems.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Postby Carlhole » Tue 10 Aug 2010, 04:22:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')I'd like to be able to post threads along Sci/Tech lines without having every single one of them attacked. Human Beings are what they are. They will do what they have evolved to do.

There are plenty of forums out there, where you can discuss it and those who attack you will get a ban.
However here you are going to be in defense, so fight or flight.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here's no point in attacking human Sci/Tech. It's bound to happen.

There are equations without solutions.


I don't get real arguments; I get a lot of sarcasm, moronic crap and personal attacks.

For example, if a post a news piece that is featured in a reputable, peer-reviewed science journal. That is simply news. It passed routine peer review! I'm sharing it with people here who might be interested. I don't need to be attacked by a bunch of bleeding tampons for posting the piece.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'I')t is possible (and in current situation very likely) that no amount of scientific innovation can solve our developing problems.


Oh right! And you would know too... wouldn't you?.. since you have more PhD's than epithelial cells. In fact, you probably crap out a few doctorates every time you sit and stink. Only idiots like Mike Ruppert are promoting doom. You belong with him. More credible people, like Richard Heinberg, talk about "managing the sustainability crisis". You actually think Science does not hold a prominent place in managing sustainability? That's it's not worth discussing?If you DO think it's worth discussing, then you can STFU with your knee-jerk attacks.
Carlhole
 
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron