Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Wow! Silence the messenger!

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Wow! Silence the messenger!

Unread postby BiGG » Sun 08 May 2005, 03:11:01

Why is it that I post a story showing how spent oil fields are being revived simply by adding some microbes and that is moved out off the Peak Oil Discussion board and I’m told the reason is the board is only for “hydrocarbon depletion "related" discussions only” Correct me if I am wrong here, but I was thinking reviving formally spent oil fields was hydrocarbon depletion "related"! Do I have this correctly that only doom & gloom threads are allowed there? Why isn’t this topic “related”, because it's extending what we have?

Next, I post news story links showing two brand new 100 million gallon per year ethanol plants being built in the Current Events section and that gets moved even though every frivolous topic others can think of is posted there!

It’s kinda looking to me like only doom & gloom is allowed on the more popular boards and anything positive gets moved to a board very few visit! How interesting….
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Jack » Sun 08 May 2005, 03:41:25

This thread is not an appropriate posting under current events. I have moved it to open discussion.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby pilferage » Sun 08 May 2005, 04:14:09

Jack's right on, and those moves were appropriate considering the categorization structure. Forget about it.
Unless you get off on thinking we're out to get you!
"Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. "
User avatar
pilferage
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: ~170ft/lbs@0rpm (on my bike)

Unread postby Raxozanne » Sun 08 May 2005, 05:13:39

I think that an alternative energy story even if it is a current event goes under energy technology.

I'm not sure what goes into current events that couldn't be filed away under another category...maybe I will take a look into current events to see what actually gets posted there :wink:

Still i don't think that one forum is more important than another. Most people if they are like me just click on the 'view posts since last visit' and then new messages from all forums pop up.
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 10 May 2005, 10:54:36

BiGG,

You don't read, follow, or seem to understand the rules and guidelines here. This thread was subject to deletion for questioning the moderator's decisions. Your entire attitude is unwelcome here. Maybe the feedback here will cause an epiphany for you. Fair warning.

The following post content is subject to deletion:

Messages devoid of content: This includes posts with nonsense characters (ie. flksdhf). This also includes posts with a single word or only containing emoticons. This includes posts on "why was my post deleted", off-topic posts, threadjacking, complaining about links, unedited reposts, repeated mod evasion, and trolling.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 10 May 2005, 11:14:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'B')iGG,

You don't read, follow, or seem to understand the rules and guidelines here. This thread was subject to deletion for questioning the moderator's decisions. Your entire attitude is unwelcome here. Maybe the feedback here will cause an epiphany for you. Fair warning.

The following post content is subject to deletion:

Messages devoid of content: This includes posts with nonsense characters (ie. flksdhf). This also includes posts with a single word or only containing emoticons. This includes posts on "why was my post deleted", off-topic posts, threadjacking, complaining about links, unedited reposts, repeated mod evasion, and trolling.


Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought we've already proven the mods around here are ANYTHING but "unbaised and fair".......
So, this kat calling out the mods isnt out of line, as theres been....ahhh...."instances" of mod abuse or stepping over the lines in the past.

Not to say his topics in question did or did not to be moved, but lets be honest, no mod on this board can sit and give us this High and Mighty shit about how open and understanding they are.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 10 May 2005, 11:19:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'T')his thread is not an appropriate posting under current events. I have moved it to open discussion.


When in the Hell did YOU become a moderator?!

Having you and Monte in the same thread as mods would be rather like having Ted Nugent and Sarah Brady in the same room...... 8O
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 10 May 2005, 11:24:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', ' ')
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought we've already proven the mods around here are ANYTHING but "unbaised and fair".......
So, this kat calling out the mods isnt out of line, as theres been....ahhh...."instances" of mod abuse or stepping over the lines in the past.

Not to say his topics in question did or did not to be moved, but lets be honest, no mod on this board can sit and give us this High and Mighty shit about how open and understanding they are.


You don't like the way things are done here, I suggest you move on. The mods on this board are open and understanding enough to be chosen as such. There has been no moderator abuse that has come to light that I am aware of, or that the admin has voiced concern over.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 10 May 2005, 11:27:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', ' ')
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought we've already proven the mods around here are ANYTHING but "unbaised and fair".......
So, this kat calling out the mods isnt out of line, as theres been....ahhh...."instances" of mod abuse or stepping over the lines in the past.

Not to say his topics in question did or did not to be moved, but lets be honest, no mod on this board can sit and give us this High and Mighty shit about how open and understanding they are.

I suggest you move on.


And miss all the fun?! :shock:
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 12:30:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'B')iGG,

You don't read, follow, or seem to understand the rules and guidelines here............. and trolling.


In all fairness here, how many threads have you been following me on saying “Don’t Feed The Trolls”?

I’m not “trolling” here at all simply because I have an educated opinion. You get proven to be incorrect on several issues and resort to spamming threads saying don’t feed the trolls over and over instead of conceding your incorrect assertions? I really don’t think you would like it if everybody started doing the same after your posts repeatedly. You are supposed to be a leader here and resorting to childish tactics like the troll thingy because I beat you in debate?
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 10 May 2005, 12:44:10

BiGG,

You continue to assert I said things I did not, did not do research I did and provided to you. Evryone who has read the threads knows this, yet you continue the mantra like a child.

You make supurious claims and fail to back up it with hard science and data. You have no credibility here.

You are an annoyance. "Don't feed the trolls" is policy for this kind of crap you post. Get used to it.

What is a Troll?
An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset people.

Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for their bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are hurting real people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human but are a kind of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering they cause, the greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.

Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility.

Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not be changed by mere words.

What Can be Done about Trolls?
When you suspect that somebody is a troll, you might try responding with a polite, mild message to see if it's just somebody in a bad mood. Internet users sometimes let their passions get away from them when seated safely behind their keyboard. If you ignore their bluster and respond in a pleasant manner, they usually calm down.

However, if the person persists in being beastly, and seems to enjoy being unpleasant, the only effective position is summed up as follows:

The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls.
When you try to reason with a troll, he wins. When you insult a troll, he wins. When you scream at a troll, he wins. The only thing that trolls can't handle is being ignored.

http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 13:33:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'B')iGG,

You continue to assert I said things I did not, did not do research I did and provided to you. Evryone who has read the threads knows this, yet you continue the mantra like a child.

You make supurious claims and fail to back up it with hard science and data. You have no credibility here.

You are an annoyance. "Don't feed the trolls" is policy for this kind of crap you post. Get used to it.


Come on MonteQuest, Are you talking about this ethanol “research” you said you did even though I clearly pointed out your research had nothing to do with the subject we were talking about being KO11 biotechnology ethanol? Yes I said your research had nothing to do with KO11 biotechnology and it didn’t!

If you want “hard” numbers regarding KO11 biotechnology, I suggest you e-mail the esteemed microbiologist professor Lonnie Ingram at the University of Florida , he’s a really nice guy to talk with on the phone and I think he would be happy to accommodate you; his word is good enough for me though.

I quoted the esteemed microbiologist professor Lonnie Ingram with his figures saying his new technology makes 90-95% efficient ethanol using waste product and provided government links on the issues also. I promised you nothing more than that ever and if a knowledgeable scientist tells me something I going to am believe him over you who has no knowledge regarding his technological breakthrough, especially when there is a $90,000,000 plant, being built supporting his opinion with private venture capitol no less. I haven’t even mentioned the technology competing with his yet either!

I am an annoyance because of what, providing reliable information showing oil isn’t cheap at all like some keep claiming? Talk about “credibility”! You are one of those who keep claiming oil is “cheap” even though I have clearly shown oil costs US over $5,00 per gallon right now! That doesn’t sound very credible claiming oil is “cheap” at all to me. And .... I surly still believe no biofuels come close to that figure making them more then “competitive” with your alleged “cheap” oil just like I originally stated!
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 13:39:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
What is a Troll?
An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset people.

Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for their bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are hurting real people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human but are a kind of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering they cause, the greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.

Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility.

Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not be changed by mere words.

What Can be Done about Trolls?
When you suspect that somebody is a troll, you might try responding with a polite, mild message to see if it's just somebody in a bad mood. Internet users sometimes let their passions get away from them when seated safely behind their keyboard. If you ignore their bluster and respond in a pleasant manner, they usually calm down.

However, if the person persists in being beastly, and seems to enjoy being unpleasant, the only effective position is summed up as follows:

The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls.
When you try to reason with a troll, he wins. When you insult a troll, he wins. When you scream at a troll, he wins. The only thing that trolls can't handle is being ignored.

http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm


I agree with this! Like I mentioned in the other thread, trolls have no place here getting in the way of those like me who put forth intelligent conversations. Peak Oil should have voices showing the real world making intelligent arguments instead of those just filling up the boards with nothings or false an/or misleading banter.

I will do my best to ignore trolls from now on also! Great advice!
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby stu » Tue 10 May 2005, 13:49:58

Bigg.

I may not be an expert on the issues that you and Monte have got into heated debates about, but if you were right on the majority of things that you were discussing such as the EROEI for example then I think you would have equally intelligent people on this forum backing you up. Seeing as you don't I'm gonna stick with the words of the wise and take Montes side.

Ain't nothing personal.
"The age of excess is over. The age of entropy has begun"
User avatar
stu
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2500
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ye Olde Englande

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 14:48:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stu', 'B')igg.

I may not be an expert on the issues that you and Monte have got into heated debates about, but if you were right on the majority of things that you were discussing such as the EROEI for example then I think you would have equally intelligent people on this forum backing you up. Seeing as you don't I'm gonna stick with the words of the wise and take Montes side.

Ain't nothing personal.


No problem here at all Stu! A popularity contest is the least of my concerns, I just like facts. As far as the people “backing me up” … I think if you click around a little on the links I have provided here so far (a partial list below} you will see thousands of PhDs, Scientists, & even general laymen like construction supervisors directly involved and if they say things like “sustainable”, “competitive”, “efficient” and what not, its good enough for me.

I’m just showing others here tens of thousands at the minimum of PhDs, Professors, & Scientists around the planet are developing & building viable alternatives to antiquated oil as we speak and real answers exist that don’t cost $5.00+ per gallon……


Biodiesel Production Gets Simplified

Spent Oil Fields Revived + other applications

Bio-Waste Turned into Fuel

Bio-Fuels Experts

More on WASTE being turned into Fuel

Tree Power

"Pac Man" Enzymes

Microbial Fuel Cell: High Yield Hydrogen

As I mentioned, this is only a small part of what I have already listed and we haven’t really even hardly looked at what’s being done with Nuclear, Coal, Sun, Wind, Hydrogen, Methane …. etc.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby stu » Tue 10 May 2005, 15:25:01

Ok Bigg.

I can gather from those links that you are a big fan of bio-fuels.

In which case I put to you the following questions?

What are the EROEI of these biofuels?

What parts of modern society can they replace?

How long would it take to implement the changes needed to switch to a part bio-fuel economy?

Does the investment and collective will exist in order to make biofuels a viable alternative?

Is the technology for biofuels at an advanced stage where it can be seriously considered as a viable alternative?
"The age of excess is over. The age of entropy has begun"
User avatar
stu
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2500
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ye Olde Englande

Unread postby The_Virginian » Tue 10 May 2005, 16:52:43

Bigg,

Ok so let's work on assumtion that Benzine/Gasoline costs 5 FRN a gallon.

Now there is just one problem with Petroleum VS. Bio-fuels.

FEDRAL RESEVE NOTES are created out of thin air and can be manipulated.

BIO-FUELS take REAL Human LABOR and RECOURCES....above and beyond the "COST" of Petroleum.

Understand this point well, and you will understand why most here do not put faith in Bio-Fuels.

IF we Factor in the Oil Wars for petroleum into the (human) cost...and it looks mighty bad.

But how bad do you think it would be when Farmland becomes a coveted source of wealth and infrastructure? (Humans will fight for recources of any kind, it is in our nature when we are unleashed from restraints.)

I am a bio-fuels fan BTW, I advocate their use as a stop-gap, but that is all they are IMHO. Otherwise, they are a false messiah in my book. Nothing even in combonation, that we have TODAY, really replaces the "gift" of Petrol recources.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 19:49:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stu', 'O')k Bigg.

I can gather from those links that you are a big fan of bio-fuels.

In which case I put to you the following questions?

What are the EROEI of these biofuels?

What parts of modern society can they replace?

How long would it take to implement the changes needed to switch to a part bio-fuel economy?

Does the investment and collective will exist in order to make biofuels a viable alternative?

Is the technology for biofuels at an advanced stage where it can be seriously considered as a viable alternative?


I think the first thing you want to do is forget all about sound-bites like “EROEI” & “Scalability” and try to look at things realistically.

Does EROEI really matter so long as the bio-fuel/electric/whatever you are buying for your car/home/whatever is less or similar to the price you pay for antiquated oil now? Nope, it doesn’t matter to you a bit. If we can make sustainable fuel from bio-waste and other items using a little, sun, wind, nuclear, coal, methane, hydrogen etc. cheaper or equal at the pump that’s all that really matters and there’s an awful lot of PhDs, Engineers, Professors, Scientists, Businessmen & Women saying we can making a fancy to some sound-bite like EROEI meaningless in this equation.

“Scalability” has to be the biggest yawn on these boards. Looking at what we have already built and a world moving at near light-speed with the advent of computers, nobody will ever convince me we can’t build a replacement for antiquated oil like we are starting on all over the world right now already.

As far as “replacing” antiquated oil …….. The multinational, I don’t know how many trillion dollar economy going on out there right now is slowly bringing replacements for antiquated oil online for two reasons A) the replacements are becoming viable & cost effective right now attracting gigantic amounts of investment capitol for the first time instead of mainly relying on government handouts, and B) we need a s-l-o-w transition anyway allowing as little collateral damage as possible along the way.

We cannot displace too many workers at once without replacing the jobs in other fields. This is happening right now, it’s going to continue happening until antiquated oil is replaced completely and prices will remain relatively stable as the more new replacements we build; the more devalued old oil becomes.

We have leaders; millions of them who know it’s in everybody’s interest to have a slow smooth transition that we have plenty of cheap antiquated oil for. This change will a few decades to be in place and many are going to get very rich along the way.

As I have mentioned several times here in the past, do you have any idea what would happen to the price of oil & natural gas if we cut our current consumption with just the readily available existing items we already have. It would drop like a rock wrecking the economy faster than the doomers could write a book predicting it, that’s what would happen. That’s why we will be going slow.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby BiGG » Tue 10 May 2005, 19:58:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Virginian', 'B')igg,

Ok so let's work on assumtion that Benzine/Gasoline costs 5 FRN a gallon.

Now there is just one problem with Petroleum VS. Bio-fuels.

FEDRAL RESEVE NOTES are created out of thin air and can be manipulated.

BIO-FUELS take REAL Human LABOR and RECOURCES....above and beyond the "COST" of Petroleum.

Understand this point well, and you will understand why most here do not put faith in Bio-Fuels.

IF we Factor in the Oil Wars for petroleum into the (human) cost...and it looks mighty bad.

But how bad do you think it would be when Farmland becomes a coveted source of wealth and infrastructure? (Humans will fight for recources of any kind, it is in our nature when we are unleashed from restraints.)

I am a bio-fuels fan BTW, I advocate their use as a stop-gap, but that is all they are IMHO. Otherwise, they are a false messiah in my book. Nothing even in combonation, that we have TODAY, really replaces the "gift" of Petrol recources.



Oh yes there is something much greater then oil ever was, human ingenuity. Rome didn’t fall because others had oil and the United States didn’t become number 1 because this tiny country had superior numbers of people. The opponents were simply out witted & out played in both cases. Computers = technology moving at light speed, nobody can dispute that. Technology = efficiency unheard of just a few years ago, nobody can dispute that.

Biofuels along with other technologies are the future, not just a stopgap. Biowaste & biofuels are sustainable and technology & cost is making them viable. We do have centuries worth of coal, nuclear, wind, sun, hydrogen, and methane along with emerging technologies whose stupid EROEI numbers more than make up for current biofuel shortages all holding an answer for the future.

How much in exports could Canada alone manage if they turned that country into corn fields instead of forestry? Did the doomers ever mention those numbers? Some windmills, solar, coal, methane, hydrogen, & nuclear thrown in with that kind of available land mass and the only problem the Canadians would have is there wouldn’t be enough servants to go around for ALL of its citizens.

Don’t automatically fall for the doomers old tricks of passing off reverse engineering of what we have now in other words. Start with a clean slate and see how we can build something else out of what we have because that’s just exactly what we are in the middle of doing.

What are the EROEI figures for a car that now gets 15 miles to the gallon with existing oil as opposed to a car that gets 60 miles per gallon with ethanol? Do EROEI figures really matter if it cost you $22.00 worth of existing fuel to go 60 miles in that oil powered car instead of the $3 or possibly $4.00 dollars worth of biofuel? You pay less, you use less, you only need one gallon now instead of four, and the four cannot compete with one. That’s your future, efficiency does not require massive amounts of antiquated oil therefore making alternatives viable. The point is, screw EROEI numbers, we will make due just fine with less efferent fuel and a much more efficient world.

What happens to EROEI figures if all the sudden everybody is using geothermal heat and saving 70% of the current oil & gas used? We need 70% less gas, that’s what. How about insulation, efficient transportation, banning incandescent light bulbs and replacing much of the rest of the lighting with solar? There are so many ways to save power we could show a model requiring much, much less fuel requirements now & in the future. That’s what we are doing right now contrary to the doomers who are only playing flimflam tricks by trying to pass off reverse engineering on what we currently use and claim there is no other choice.

Look at what is getting built, not at what is getting torn down or you will find yourself waiting for a horse & buggy while the rest of the world blows past you in their luxury sedans just like the doomers who were claiming the world could never get by without the horse.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron