First of all, Peak Oil is a definition, not a theory. In a closed environment, it is the mid point of the recoverable, finite reserves.
Any ‘theory’ is merely speculation about the size and recoverability of reserves, and the consumption rate. Such speculation does not in any way alter the definition of Peak Oil or the inevitability of eventual decline in reserves and production. It will have some impact on when the Peak is thought to occur, but not the fact of it.
Oil pricing is responsive to the supply and demand and to trading trends and irregularities.
Since there is much unknown about the actual amount of oil reserves, there is too much speculation about when PO will occur, is occurring or has occurred. This morphs into a theory about when it will happen and when it doesn’t seem to be happening, eventually questions arise whether PO is real. By definition, PO is real. One day, presumably in hindsight, it will become painfully obvious that it is real and the great games of ‘I told you so’ and ‘How could it have been prevented’ and the even greater game of ‘taking steps to ensure it will never happen again’ will begin.
I’m somewhat amazed that this powerfully simple concept has not been applied to the world’s other finite resources that are being consumed. Granted, unlike oil, many are recyclable to some degree and this varies the formula, but not the inevitability. Even nominally self sustainable resources, such as fisheries, have their peak if consumption, disease, pollution outstrips stock replenishment, since they are then a finite and declining quantity.
Anything we use on this earth has been derived, either directly or through intermediate processes from raw resources that are essentially finite. One day, we will visit the global supermarket only to find the shelves are bare.
The article title and concept is nonsensical.