by Plantagenet » Wed 30 Jun 2010, 17:03:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'T')he Jones Act story is still getting ... reported by the press
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-0 ... spill.htmlThere is some double talk going on here. As reported in Prest's story from Businessweek, the Jones Act has NOT been waived by the administration. Repeat. The Jones Act allowing foreign vessels to operate in US waters has NOT been waived. Thats right---THE JONES ACT has NOT been waived.
Here's a quote from the June 30th Businessweek story showing that the Jones Act has NOT been waived:
"
22 Offers Accepted
The U.S. is accepting 22 offers of help from 12 countries and international organizations, the State Department said in a statement yesterday. The aid includes “two high-speed skimmers and fire containment boom from Japan,” according to the statement. The State Department didn’t immediately respond to a question concerning whether the Jones Act would be waived for the vessels."
So how does this work when the US just accepted 22 foreign offers to send vessels and such to help?
The Jones Act requires foreign vessels to operate OUTSIDE of the three mile limit, so they can work out in the Gulf but they can't help with clean-up and skimming oil near shore. The Obama people say they haven't had any requests from the foreign vessals to operate near shore, but perhaps this isn't surprising when the Obama administration is in charge of directing where the vessels are sent to work.
The next time a beach gets oiled, thank the Obama administration for keeping the Jones Act in play so those nasty foreign vessels can't sneak up close to shore and skim up any of that oil near our beaches. That will show those foreign devils not to dare to help us keep oil off our beaches. Yup. yup. yup.