by Outcast_Searcher » Fri 25 Jun 2010, 23:08:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'M')addow has a PhD in political science from Oxford, Hannity is dropout. Hannity hold rallies "for the troops" and pockets the money, etc etc.
While MSNBC makes an occasional mistake, they will not gin up hoaxes and run them week after week.
Too bad that instead of using that Oxford educated brain, Maddow resorts to constant sarcastic sniping and carping, echoing the left wing talking points. She may not be ginning up hoaxes, but she is certainly acting like a nine year old to score points with the left, instead of an objective and thoughtful reporter. Like I said, for her, for Ed, for Olbermann, this is just like watching FOX "news" but with the talking points being from the hard left instead of the hard right.
This is all about capturing RATINGS by telling a certain constituency what they want to hear. That's fine - that's their right. It just would be nice to have a little intellectual honesty, instead of shrilly attacking the other side, acting like the other side, and then steadfastly claiming you're not at all like the other side.
To cite a specific example, I am a moderate Libertarian. As such, I was VERY disappointed to hear Rand Paul use a basically racist example to make a point. It was stupid, and he was ROUNDLY attacked by the left including MSNBC, and he deserved it. Fine and dandy.
However, he then used another example, the one I had told friends (as an example) that he SHOULD have used to make his point about limited government intrusion in private business. The issue was the government imposed smoking bans in restuarants in so many cities.
Olbermann want berserk, acting like this was just as big a problem as the former issue. As though there is no possibility of a MARKET based solution, like making each restuarant choose, post a big standardized sign stating smoking or nonsmoking, and then fining the HELL out of those that violate the sign in their rules. This would let the market/customer choose. I can imagine, for example, chains having smoking AND non-smoking versions in the same city. But no, government by coercion is ALWAYS the only "correct" position from the left, so ALL who disagree with that are uniformly and unreasonably attacked by MSNBC.
(Just like all who believe we need to pay some taxes, don't want infinite military spending, or don't want the church in government are attacked by FOX).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.