Hello everything, heres a theory of mine
In all of historys and in all of ouer lives we use points of refence to measure things up, as i type out this message i am comparing it to memorys of former (good) messages that i have typed. I am comparing text to the size and color of all the other text that i see and i also check the background to determine if it is within normal standards, i see the big PO and i want a good title for this message to but i extrapolate that this is going to take much time and <behold> what remains is all good.
Now the previous example is quite simple and probably understandable, now lets weigh an imaginary mass with an imaginary balance, we put something on one end but behold, there is no counterbalance and so the balance is unbalanced and one end falls down and we have no idea how much the thing weighs. now we put on enough counterbalance untill it is in balance. Now the counterbalances are labeled as in ancient times, in 1 Mass unit, 2, 4 and etcetera and we preassume that the counterbalances are accurately labeled. Because we have a balance with accurate counterbalances we can measure the mass of something that can be interpolated or extrapolated to some extend (preassuming we have a good balance). To further reassure ouer preassumptions that we are measuring something accuratly we check the length of the 2 arms of the balance and <behold> we can observe that the 2 arms are equelly long (and the counterbalance thus represents the mass being weighed).
Now we have a lot of (apparantly unrelated) problems in the western society (that of modern Europe, USA and increasinly Azia) and we can compare that life is probably harder for the 3rd world countrys because we have ouer own society as a counterbalance to measure that. There is one phenomena that i think is very important is a very subtle unkown cause of nutritional disorders, we are born, we grow up and we [s]grow up[/s] turn into adults. Along the way we eat very many things, but apparantly, we [s]eat[/s] drink ouer first food at age 0. Up untill the moment of getting something into ouer mouths we have absolutely no reference point of what is good for us (altough there are studys that indicate the mothers diet during pregnancy/breastfeeding has effects on the childs diet). Ouer dietary choices depend heavily on the counterbalances that we have acquired in ouer childhood, if we have been fed a lot of X then we are statistically favored toward X, not because we have eaten that a lot but because X was (and is?) abundant and thus we prefer to eat X is it is instinctively more abundant and profitable for survival. When arriving at age of 10 we have arguably developed the majority of ouer dietary counterbalances, if we therefor have counterbalances that favor X, we will like X more. If ouer mothers (not so much as the father) have a counterbalance favored to X, then X is most likely going to be the primary dietary choice of the children, unless we make intellectual choices.
Now the above is not understandable, but i say this. X is not the only dietary choice and there are many more like A, C and B to just list 13% of them. But an X-fav(ored) person must intellectually choose for A, C and B because he was not favored to them, but to make that choice, he must be aware and that can only be done by someone who already has accurate counterbalances.
Now we have the image of the human diet and the X-fav. Now we have the X-fav of not a diet, but a global issue, did we aquire any accurate counterbalances?
hugs and kisses from yours truly, Sander Buruma
ps. worship me


