by Plantagenet » Wed 17 Apr 2019, 23:52:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')IPO means intial public offering, all that is required for that is the prospectus which contains the same disclosure items to the same depth as Aramco disclosed in their Bond prospectus.
You are such a thickie.
For the fourth time, a prospectus is not all that is required. The responsibility of the company doesn't end with issuing a prospectus. It is only the start of the process of going public.
Please consider how a bond is different from a company going public through an IPO.
The prospectus for the IPO, if ARAMCO ever does it, will have to be reviewed by the stock exchange---something that hasn't happened yet. Saudi Aramco will have to sign legal documents agreeing to comply with the rules of the stock exchange---something that hasn't happened yet. And Saudi Aramco will have to commit to being fully transparent with their financial status in the future...something else that hasn't happened yet.
There are no such obligations involved with issuing a prospectus for a bond. The company promises to pay interest on the bond....and thats it. Investors then review the prospectus and decide whether or not to invest. There is no stock exchange approval involved and no legal commitments to future disclosures of financial information.
Once a company goes through the IPO process and issues shares and becomes public, it is then required to comply with the rules of the exchange on which its stock is listed. These requirements also include issuing fully audited quarterly and annual reports on the companies financial status and assets to the public.
A bond has no such requirements.
Do you get it now? They are not identical processes, and they do not encumber Saudi Aramco will identical reporting reporting requirements into the future. That means the prospectuses cannot be identical. A bond prospectus will commit Saudi Aramco to pay interest on a bond---and thats it. An IPO prospectus, if it ever happens, will involve much different commitments, including issuing shares of stock, and hence will have to be written differently to reflect the different requirements.
I would think that would be obvious for most people, but I understand you are a bit of a thickie.
So go ahead and ask your next question, and I'll try to answer it. Or, as is more likely, ask the same question over and over again. I think next time will by your sixth time asking the same question. Oh well, patience is a virtue they say. Sigh.
I always try to be patient with those who are a little bit slow, so please pardon me if I don't have the patience of Job in dealing with your endless repetition of the same question.
The Patience of Job by William Blake
Cheers!