Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby KevO » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 05:06:02

at least according to an NL study
http://www.peakoil.nl/images/oil_produc ... 5-2040.pdf
and 10 years gives us a chance to get Nuclear on line so we might be saved (again) after all
plus the North Sea is doing
a lot better than expected and with the oil shales etc and the reinvestment in coal, things are looking up. I bet even Matt and Heinberg and Kunstler probably realise that they overcooked things now.
See , what were we all so concerned for?









:wink:
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby Antimatter » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 05:20:02

Jean Laherrere also reckons peak liquids is in 2015. Deffeyes is to my knowledge the only expert calling for a peak right now, though ASPO's liquids peak is 2007/8.
User avatar
Antimatter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby KevO » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 05:23:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', 'J')ean Laherrere also reckons peak liquids is in 2015. Deffeyes is to my knowledge the only expert calling for a peak right now, though ASPO's liquids peak is 2007/8.


yes PO is getting put back a lot now. In 2004 it would be 2005, now in 2005 it's 2015 before you know it the ASPO will say it's 2020

and

half of all the GOM refineries are back on-line, house prices have increased for the first time in a year in the UK, stocks are screeching upwards.
We're fine, we really are.

Crack open a bottle!
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 05:51:13

cant believe aspo and deffeyes have done it again. they've cried wolf for a further time. campbell must be getting mighty tired having to fiddle with his figures all the time as he sees oil production march upwards at over 2% a year, year on year.

still, i think peak will likely come before 2010. that report assumes there will be zero problems, no political prpblems, no hurricanes, and all the required investment etc. things never go 100% smooth like that, so if they are saying around 2010, then its probably safe to say peak may be end 2008 as the mega project study seemed to suggest.

either way, 5 years is not a lot of time, but it gives me a little bit more time to prepare i suppose, and my little boys will be a fair bit older by then which is a very good thing. we might even be almost out of debt assuming i have a job still
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby MattSavinar » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 06:06:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', 'a')t least according to an NL study
http://www.peakoil.nl/images/oil_produc ... 5-2040.pdf
and 10 years gives us a chance to get Nuclear on line so we might be saved (again) after all
plus the North Sea is doing
a lot better than expected and with the oil shales etc and the reinvestment in coal, things are looking up. I bet even Matt and Heinberg and Kunstler probably realise that they overcooked things now.
See , what were we all so concerned for?



A major American city goes from being a thriving landmark and port of international commerce to being a thriving cesspool of rape gangs and anarchy in under 4 days with virtually no response from the government?

No, I'd say we've undercooked things.

Yes, yes, I know "katrina does not equal peak oil." Katrina was an enviromental disaster made 100 X worse by poor leadership. But dealing with environmental catastrophes and poor leadership are two of the five factors identified by Jared Diamond in "Collapse" as leading to societal collapse.

Why should we have any hope of our government responding to the "long emergency" with any more effectiveness than it did to the "short emergency" that was the hurricane?

I don't think anybody - even people as cynical as me! - would have anticipated such a horribly piss-poor response to Katrina.

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby KevO » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 06:23:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', '
')
Why should we have any hope of our government responding to the "long emergency" with any more effectiveness than it did to the "short emergency" that was the hurricane?

I don't think anybody - even people as cynical as me! - would have anticipated such a horribly piss-poor response to Katrina.

Best,

Matt


Hi Matt.
I think they're not that stupid.
I truly think it was deliberate, not the hurricane but the response.
I don't know what the US media is telling the US people but here we are told that the National Guard were ready to go the day of the hurricane but had to wait for the order form above - which took 3 days in coming.
It's for the very reason of scenarios like those that are suggeested here, at your site and by Heinberg and Kunstler that the Bush admin waited to see what would occur so they would know what society will do come the Long emergency....and now they have a damn site better idea.

The sickening thing is that this could mean that peakoilites were involved in the deaths of thousands, expounding their peak oil theories etc unless of course the CIA did their own models independantly!!
Peak Oilites were blamed for the rise in oil prices earlier this year!!

Food for thought
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby peripato » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 08:49:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Antimatter', 'J')ean Laherrere also reckons peak liquids is in 2015. Deffeyes is to my knowledge the only expert calling for a peak right now, though ASPO's liquids peak is 2007/8.


yes PO is getting put back a lot now. In 2004 it would be 2005, now in 2005 it's 2015 before you know it the ASPO will say it's 2020

and

half of all the GOM refineries are back on-line, house prices have increased for the first time in a year in the UK, stocks are screeching upwards.
We're fine, we really are.

Crack open a bottle!


A.k.a Plan Snooze. Although it is foolish to predict with absolute certainty when we might peak even if it is still 10 years away this leaves us very little time to start making fundamental changes to our way of life. I fear we will squander any grace period left to us before decline sets in as continuing "business as usual" takes no special effort, whereas undertaking the alternatives hurts no matter how you look at them. It won't take much to convince ourselves that because we've been on the petroleum peak for so long we can continue along it indefinitely without ramifications to ourselves or our environment. After all we've been hard-wired by millions of years of evolution to discount time and space in this way.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby nero » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 13:14:02

Has anyone else been noticing the parallels between Katrina and Peak Oil.

Both events had been long predicted. When couldn't be exactly known, but it was noly a matter of time.

Experts said we were critically unprepared for both events.

The government decided to persue the same policy for both events. They ignored it.

Let's just hope that the government response to peak oil is better than it was for the hurricane.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby FoxV » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 13:54:10

here's my biggest problem with Peak oil models

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')C) Assumptions

There will be no material, pipeline, shipping or manpower restrictions to bring any oil production to the market...

There are no refinery restrictions to bring the new oil supply to the market...

There are no political, economical or natural events that take oil production offline...

by making these assumptions they have dismissed a huge part of issues with Oil Production. This gives them a theoretical date that is Realistically totaly wrong.

We have a manpower and raw material problem
we have a refinery problem
we have political, economical, and nateral events.
Each of these issues effectively shaves the top off the peak (lets not forget that Saudi Arabia is only three octogenarian's away from fuedal war), and will move the real date closer than any theoretical date

Just by the fact of containing the issue only to oil production makes the model irrelevant because its not oil, its the products that count

if they created models for Peak Gasoline, Diesel, Aviation fuel, etc (including natural gas by availability), you would see our crisis is much more imminent

nope, I don't think its time to break out the bubbley just yet, as a matter of fact I think its time to start "battening down the hatches" because the storm has started
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby tsakach » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 14:22:04

Hmmm. This report does not seem to include the effect of Katrina on production.

The report shows a decline of only 69,000 bpd for the US between Q1 2005 and year end 2005. At the present time the IEA shows a stock draw totaling almost 2 m/bpd to make up for lost production resulting from Katrina.

Between 2004 and year end 2005, the increase in world production shown is 2,098,000 bpd. Adding this up, we have an increase of only 168,000 bbd until production is brought back online in the gulf.

IEA details Katrina oil stock effort
Last edited by tsakach on Wed 07 Sep 2005, 15:00:45, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
tsakach
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby Ancien_Opus » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 14:45:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')oxv Wrote: nope, I don't think its time to break out the bubbley just yet, as a matter of fact I think its time to start "battening down the hatches" because the storm has started


I agree.

Just the start of "The Long Emergency". The easy way is giving way to the hard way. Around the globe the oil crisis grows for the poor. It's going to be a difficult winter this year in the Midwest. Fuel & natural gas prices will be in the news. It largerly depends on how you spin the definition of "oil" because it looks like light sweet crude may have already peaked. The big bet is on the economic consequences, lag between purchases versus charged credit and debt due. The band will have to be paid.

Regards,
User avatar
Ancien_Opus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby trendal » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 14:52:16

plus the North Sea is doing
a lot better than expected


Maybe they've just managed to squeze a few more bpd out of the wells? If they're already in decline, that probably just means an even steeper cliff in the future.
"Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it."
-- Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
trendal
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby CARVER » Wed 07 Sep 2005, 15:02:01

This report is made by Taskforce_Unity and he has started the discussion here: http://peakoil.com/fortopic11688.html
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby seb » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 03:07:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', 'a')t least according to an NL study
http://www.peakoil.nl/images/oil_produc ... 5-2040.pdf
and 10 years gives us a chance to get Nuclear on line so we might be saved (again) after all
plus the North Sea is doing
a lot better than expected and with the oil shales etc and the reinvestment in coal, things are looking up. I bet even Matt and Heinberg and Kunstler probably realise that they overcooked things now.
See , what were we all so concerned for?

Ok, let's have a closer look at the graph from ASPO and the link you gave...

ASPO: peak at 30 Gb/y in 2008. In 2040, only 15Gb/y are predicted. A drop of 50% in 32 years.

Your link : peak at 94 Mb/d in 2013. In 2040, only 30Mb/d are predicted. A drop of almost 70% in 27 years!!

And you feel better with the second report?! 8O :shock: :? The second scenario would probably lead to a very hard landing. :cry: Can you imagine a drop of two 3rd of the oil supply in just a quarter of a century? This is not manageable.
If technology can push the peak up a bit more, I predict the post PO era will be even darker. Just because nobody will spend the time we won to develop alternatives, and the decline will be faster. It is still hard to say, but it may be possible that we deal with PO the worst way possible. The higher, the steeper the cliff. Go, go, go, go higher... :twisted:
Not mother tongue. Sorry for the mistakes.
User avatar
seb
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue 05 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Back France from Japan
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby Taskforce_Unity » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 03:19:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', '
')still, i think peak will likely come before 2010. that report assumes there will be zero problems, no political prpblems, no hurricanes, and all the required investment etc. things never go 100% smooth like that, so if they are saying around 2010, then its probably safe to say peak may be end 2008 as the mega project study seemed to suggest.


Actually, due to those problems the peak will shift to al later date. It will mean higher prices in the short term future but not MUCH higher prices. Unless ofcourse all of a sudden there are major problems, hurricans etc. everywhere and around 6 mb/d are taken offline for a longer period off time. Which i deem unlikely

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FoxV', '
')by making these assumptions they have dismissed a huge part of issues with Oil Production. This gives them a theoretical date that is Realistically totaly wrong.


Ofcourse, since i do not have enough data on such restrictions that would make it guess work. That's why i did not include such restrictions. If you have any suggestions for a way to implement such a scenario im willing to put it in though. For the moment it is a theoretical model and i put those assumptions in there to make it clear that there will be less oil on the market and this only shows the maximum theoretically possible oil growth in the near future.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tsakach', 'H')mmm. This report does not seem to include the effect of Katrina on production.


correct, as of to date we do not have enough data to fully know the effects of Katrina on oil production. Futhermore it is assumed that such things do not take place just to calculate the theoretical amount of oil on the market.

As above i would like to make such a scenario but i have no theoretical basis on how often these disruptions occur and how big they are. If anyone has data on this that would be great

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seb', '
')ASPO: peak at 30 Gb/y in 2008. In 2040, only 15Gb/y are predicted. A drop of 50% in 32 years.

Your link : peak at 94 Mb/d in 2013. In 2040, only 30Mb/d are predicted. A drop of almost 70% in 27 years!!


Well that is a lot of guesswork, how much will the depletion increase to? I used the IEA figure of between 6 to 11% as a basis getting 7% depletion(as a factor from production) but it might be way too high. Don't know, those figures are so non transparant.

You should read it like this though

outlook 2005-2010, fairly accurate
outlook 2010-2040, guesstimate which is there to show that it is quite likely that the peak will occur between 2010-2015 and maybe a little bit later between 2015-2020 but definetly NOT later then 2020.

Maybe i should make it more clear in the report? What do you guys think.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby Falconoffury » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 15:37:16

I trust ASPO the most because they break each type of oil into sections. Conventional oil has been in decline for a few years already. Combined oil should peak in around 2 years. All oil and gas combined will peak in about 2010. I don't see how we can last past 2010.

Another point to consider is how oil depletion affects the economy. During August this year, world oil demand went above production. Asia and Indonesia are the first to feel this crunch. They are already waiting in lines for gasoline. Europe and the Americas could start feeling the crunch early next year, still years before peak. Exponential growth is our downfall, and it will only take 2 more years at the most before oil depletion is felt across the world.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 15:54:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't see how we can last past 2010


Kazachstan has a considerable amount of oil that is not expected to come onto production until about 2009. The additional rates according to Wood Mackenzie would push the peak out to 2015. As well you ignore totally the Saudi issue. Simmon's suggestion that they have peaked and are declining rapidly is not based on hard facts and Aramco suggests the opposite. Not having the data leaves a fair bit of uncertainty.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 20:28:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')ho are you going to believe? An Aramco official who is probably one of 10,000 Saudi Royal Family members (busy trying to placate 20,000,000 poor, unemployed, testosterone-ridden Saudi teens--the average age there is about 25.) Or an intelligent objective US investment banker with no particular agenda?

Simmons' facts are as hard as anybody elses.


Well actually Simmons is dealing with inference almost completely from a few published papers that are woefully out of date. His suggestion that 30% water production spells the immediate doom of a field is just not on as is evidenced from fields all over the world. Almost everything he says is based on supposition. There was a comment on another thread from someone who claimed to have worked for a company on the Saudi fields in question...he noted that Simmons underestimated the reserves in the fields by huge amounts...but declined to speak further due to confidentiality issues....how credible this is we can only wonder.
I see no more reason to believe Simmons who is, after all a financial analyst and not a reservoir engineer versus the Saudis at this point in time.....neither produce hard compelling evidence from a reservoir engineering perspective. Having had some exposure to Aramco directly and indirectly through colleagues who have worked there over the past 15 years I suspect the true answer is ....Saudis are overestimating and Simmons is underestimating. And as I said earlier until we have a better level of comfort with the Saudi reserves the error bar on peak oil timing is pretty large.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is still 5 to 10 years away

Unread postby Lehyina » Thu 08 Sep 2005, 23:52:29

Something which I think is being slightly overlooked here is the sensitivity of world demand/consumption projections. Whatever the liquids production capacity projection and its peak is, the real crunch comes about when supply becomes permanently less than demand. By way of example lets assume for a moment that this particular production capacity forecast is perfect and has no inherent uncertainty.
Now if world average demand growth is a constant 2% per annum from here onwards the supply demand gap will be permanent as from 2010 onwards. If however world average demand growth is only 1% per annum from here onwards the permanent supply demand gap will not occur until 2016 onwards - so this one factor alone (i.e. demand growth assumption) gives an uncertainty range of 6 years for the point at which the supply demand gap becomes permanent. By not giving sufficient attention to this kind of uncertainty peakoilers give a misleading idea about the supposed accuracy of projections and have thereby expose themselves to the 'crying wolf' criticism. Personally, whether the critical year is 2005, 2010, 2015 or even 2030, its still too short a time when I consider what kind of world and society my grandchildren are going to inherit.
User avatar
Lehyina
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron