Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak OIL date: Apr-May 2005

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby 0mar » Sun 13 Mar 2005, 03:00:46

We are projected to pull 84 or so million barrels of oil per day. I don't see what your calculations are doing ohanian :) sorry!

Hubbard's model is only based on a few assumptions.

1. Total recoverable oil (approximately 1.8 - 2.2 trillion barrels for the world).
2. The upside of the curve is roughly symmetrical to the downside.
3. The turning point for the curve to start it's descent is when the reserve base is down to 50% of its ultimately recoverable reserve (in our case .9 to 1.1 trillion barrels).
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Unread postby clv101 » Sun 13 Mar 2005, 05:46:46

You are missing way too many pieces of the puzzle. In February 2005 the world produced 84.3 million barrels per day. You're not taking into account all the new projects coming on line (the reason we're up to 84.3 just now).
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: It'll be rough - but...

Unread postby Golgo13 » Tue 15 Mar 2005, 02:17:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FusionMaster5000', 'I')n response to the previous post: We are indeed a plucky lot. Sure, we've painted ourselves into a corner at this time, but when push comes to shove, human innovation comes alive. I hope that we're more than a bunch of reindeer on an island...


Reminds me of this exerpt from Savinar's book:

Image
User avatar
Golgo13
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon 13 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby Dan1195 » Sat 19 Mar 2005, 19:15:29

I agree that attempting to pick a day or month is pointless, as we will only truly know after the fact. However, I believe we are close enough to the peak year (I do not believe it has occured yet) that analysis of depletion rates, new projects, etc. can give us a reasonable estimate of when this will occur.

It is important to distinguish between demand exceeding supply, which may occur prior to a recession through higher prices, or may be the cause of one, and actual decline of production.

2005

AS I understand (I am not any kind of oil expert) This year the following rough numbers apply:

Spare Capacity: +1 mbd (mostly sour crude, but assume it can be used)
New Pojects: +3 mbd (delays always possible)
Depletion: -1.2 mbd (but increasing, e.g. decline of Canterall in Mexico)
New Demand -2 mbd.

That leaves about 0.8 mbd. Basically same position as right now.

2006

Spare: +0.8 mbd
New: +2 mbd
Depletion: -1.2 mbd (probably conservative)
Demand: -2 mbd (of course recession is possible at almost any time)

this leaves -0.4 mbd. (but +0.8 production for the year)

Beyond 2006 I am unsure about new projects but I know basically nothing substantial is coming online beyond 2007, all the while depletion rates will be increasing. IMHO it would take some massive find to push peak much beyond 2007.

Regarding Hubbert curves, there is essentialy a curve of each phase of oil exploration and production:

Discovery Curve: Peaked ~1965, now on far downslope (few finds)
Reserve Curve (backdated): Peaked 1980-1985.
Production Curve: Est. Peak ~2006-2008
Rate of Depletion Curve: prob. 2025-2030.

Approx. 20 year offset for each curve at their peak.
User avatar
Dan1195
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby maverickdoc » Sat 19 Mar 2005, 20:00:00

Dan1195, good post where did you get the "New Pojects: +3 mbd"
from?
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Dan1195 » Sat 19 Mar 2005, 21:08:00

hmm...It was somewhere in the forums I think, I think it was also in an analysis of upcoming projects I saw someplace else.
User avatar
Dan1195
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:41:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zeltum', 'O')il may peak in about 50 years, but it won't matter. It won't be the primary resource then. Just like coal isn't now. And I know you crazies on here will all say "there is no alternative to oil etc" but my grandfather keeps telling me how eveyone said that about coal in his day.

You seem to have a blind faith that science/technology will somehow provide a "magic bullet" solution to our energy needs. You will not find many scientists who expect this.

There are possible technologies that will power your car or heat your house, but they will be very expensive and may take decades to develop and may be environmentally bad.

Take a look at this recent British Petroleum presentation:
http://peakoil.com/article3152.html&mod ... =0&thold=0
It doesn't give me the impression that we can have exponentially increasing oil production for 50 years.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Unread postby Michael_Allison » Wed 23 Mar 2005, 13:26:07

Never underestimate the human ability to ignore hard facts when they aren't palatable.

The truth hurts and all that.

Personally, I think it's irrelevant what the actual date is, if there is any particular day, that we hit peak oil. It's a bell curve and we are at, or very near, the top of that curve. It's all downhill from here!

Incidentally, I think it's telling that recently OPEC announced that it will increase production by, I think it was 500,000 barrels a day. The market's response was telling - the price jumped to $55 a barrel. Now, maybe OPEC believes they are going to slake the thirst for oil, but it's clear that investors and analysts don't buy it.

Concerning abiotic oil... that may work in Russia, but in Texas the oil isn't renewing itself one little bit. It's a crackpot theory, at least, and may even be a deliberate manipulation to assuage public concern.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
-Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Michael_Allison
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Idaho, USA

Unread postby ohanian » Thu 31 Mar 2005, 17:33:03

There is only 22 days to go for my original prediction of April 22nd 2005 as indicated by the first post in this thread.

So far, things are looking on track.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby killJOY » Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:48:27

It's useless picking a peak date because there will be no peak--there will be a long plateau.

Let's call it "Hubbert's Mesa."

Oil production will fall flat as demand gobbles up increases in production.

For awhile it's a tug-of-war between demand and supply, a long stretch of bumpy (very) road.

Then production will begin to decline. That will be almost anti-climactic after the chaos that has ensued on Hubbert's Mesa.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Unread postby ohanian » Fri 22 Apr 2005, 08:15:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', 'T')here is only 22 days to go for my original prediction of April 22nd 2005 as indicated by the first post in this thread.

So far, things are looking on track.


Today is 22nd April 2005
The date of my original prediction.
The date of peak oil.

From today onwards, we are going down in global volume of oil production.

By the way. Please feel free to pass judgement on my original prediction.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby clv101 » Fri 22 Apr 2005, 09:13:55

Your analysis is flawed - if this turns out to be peak it's a coincidence and not for the reasons you identify. You're still working of 82mbps - net production has been climbing fast for the last year, Feb 05 produced a daily average of 83.5mbpd.

If this turns out to be peak then it will be because a large producer (like SA) has unexpectedly entered decline. Your analysis doesn't model this so any accuracy is coincidental.

See this article for a more rigorous analysis:
ODAC: Understanding Depletion
http://www.energybulletin.net/5395.html
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Unread postby ohanian » Fri 22 Apr 2005, 11:18:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clv101', 'Y')our analysis is flawed - if this turns out to be peak it's a coincidence and not for the reasons you identify. You're still working of 82mbps - net production has been climbing fast for the last year, Feb 05 produced a daily average of 83.5mbpd.

If this turns out to be peak then it will be because a large producer (like SA) has unexpectedly entered decline. Your analysis doesn't model this so any accuracy is coincidental.

See this article for a more rigorous analysis:
ODAC: Understanding Depletion
http://www.energybulletin.net/5395.html


I agree with you but it is just a pure coincidence that the grapes which you can't reach are sour. If only they taste sweeter then it might be more acceptable to you.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Kez » Fri 06 May 2005, 15:58:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', 'T')here is only 22 days to go for my original prediction of April 22nd 2005 as indicated by the first post in this thread.

So far, things are looking on track.


Today is 22nd April 2005
The date of my original prediction.
The date of peak oil.

From today onwards, we are going down in global volume of oil production.

By the way. Please feel free to pass judgement on my original prediction.


Last week (first week of May, 2005) the cost for basic gas near Dallas, Texas was $2.15 a gallon. 5 days later it was $2.08 a gallon at the same station.

I don't know ohanian if you're just trying to be famous or whatever by predicting a specific date, but it really doesn't matter. What matters is when the prices start to rise, and people who never noticed these things before start paying attention and changing their behaviors. I don't think that will happen for a few more years still, at least.
Kez
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North Texas
Top

Re: Peak OIL date: Apr-May 2005

Unread postby AdamB » Wed 20 Aug 2025, 16:55:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', 'A')ll,

Here is my bold prediction on the date of peak oil.
April - May 2005
Here is how I arrived at that date.


Who cares. Do you feel about as dumb as the local parrot now? Because you should. Maybe a little smarter, parrots can't even read a chart to know when global peak occurred and just make things up they heard somewhere...sometime....from someone...being just parrots and all, details don't matter.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Peak OIL date: Apr-May 2005

Unread postby careinke » Thu 28 Aug 2025, 22:38:01

Any engineering degree earned 20 years ago would have been a GREAT degree.

Peace
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Peak OIL date: Apr-May 2005

Unread postby AdamB » Fri 29 Aug 2025, 20:31:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', 'A')ny engineering degree earned 20 years ago would have been a GREAT degree.
Peace


What is the logic behind that? I might speculate on the value of a modern degree in general, working with younglings regularly nowadays, and of engineering degrees generations ago, but I don't have a direct path from "oid degree good, new degree "not as good". I tend to differentiate between quality of thinking rather than degrees. But I will grant that my experience with the Ivy's is substantial, and shitfire it doesn't matter what their degrees are in, you had better bring a PhD level game in your field to at least fight to a draw.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron