Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Paper Tigers?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Paper Tigers?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 22 Aug 2005, 14:08:51

Bin Laden has suggested that the people of America are paper tigers and can't stand the heat of War. He says that the US will give up in defeat now just as we did in Somalia and Vietnam. There are differences between now and then of course, the main ones being that we have a volunteer military and far fewer are being killed now than back then. Therefore there will be less political heat in Washington. Protest movements are just window dressing today. The War goes on. The real danger is that the military institutions will collapse from within. The stress of trying to be 'contemporary' in a PC World and fight a war at the same time. If you add Peak Oil to the equation, then our true answer to Bin Laden may come with gloves off and fighting, or mired in a new depression with a once-great military.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby sklump » Mon 22 Aug 2005, 14:49:52

Bin Laden will be made to do or say whatever the Pentagon needs him to say to manufacture consent for whatever the Pentagon wanted to do in the first place.

Just my opinion. Feel free not to take it seriously :-D . I can see my own tinfoil hat reflected in the monitor.
As Canadian as ... possible, under the circumstances
User avatar
sklump
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 22 Aug 2005, 14:57:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sklump', 'B')in Laden will be made to do or say whatever the Pentagon needs him to say to manufacture consent for whatever the Pentagon wanted to do in the first place.

Just my opinion. Feel free not to take it seriously :-D . I can see my own tinfoil hat reflected in the monitor.
I was even thinking about raising what you said in the first post. Figured, nah, it'll come up anyway. First off in fact! Of course in this Through the Looking Glass world anything is possible.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 00:31:22

Maybe the Iraq situation will turn out like this: Iraqi military becomes the strongest faction as the US pulls back into bases built in country. Civilian institutions aren't viable and chaos causes military to seize control. This military junta, however, is pro-West and the West leaves them with carte blanc to pacify the country and stabilize the oil exports and allow for infrastructure re-build to happen. All this with strategic information blackouts and managed news.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 04:25:53

I think OBL is right, he may be ugly but he ain't dumb. And look at how every war since WWII went for us, worn down to a standstill every time at best.

WWII was a bit different, lots of blood relatives over there in Europe under threat, plus legitimate fears of the Japanese on the west coast. And soldiers who were used to doing with very little during the Depression, already used to hunger etc.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 04:39:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'I') think OBL is right, he may be ugly but he ain't dumb. And look at how every war since WWII went for us, worn down to a standstill every time at best.

WWII was a bit different, lots of blood relatives over there in Europe under threat, plus legitimate fears of the Japanese on the west coast. And soldiers who were used to doing with very little during the Depression, already used to hunger etc.


Absolutely.
Theres already strong opposition to the war.
The American people no longer have the spine to see a job through to the end.
Which is unfortunate, as they dont realize this is a war of life or death, and we simply cannot afford to lose.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 05:21:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he American people no longer have the spine to see a job through to the end.


This wasn't the job of the American people to begin with. We had no business in Iraq. My uncle, who is stationed there, appears to agree.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 05:24:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he American people no longer have the spine to see a job through to the end.


This wasn't the job of the American people to begin with. We had no business in Iraq. My uncle, who is stationed there, appears to agree.


So you use the opinion of 1 individual stationed in Iraq and think this reflects the feelings of the group?

Now, whether it was the job of the American people or not is a whole different ballgame. One I wont play at this time. :-D
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 05:26:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o you use the opinion of 1 individual stationed in Iraq and think this reflects the feelings of the group?


By no means should you assume that.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 05:32:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '
')This wasn't the job of the American people to begin with. We had no business in Iraq. My uncle, who is stationed there, appears to agree.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o you use the opinion of 1 individual stationed in Iraq and think this reflects the feelings of the group?


By no means should you assume that.


Well, you state your opinion (We shouldnt be there) then use a source that is also stationed there and shares your opinion to lend credibility to your statement.
What should I assume?
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 22:15:38

Perhaps that not everyone in Iraq thinks this war is worthwhile and it would be worthwhile to actually talk to people of various views that have been there or are currently there to help modify your opinion?

If you really want to have some semblence of a look at the feelings of the 'group' perhaps it would be worth your while to look at various journals of the soldiers in Iraq or who have served in Iraq and look at interveiws conducted with them.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby pea-jay » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:41:18

The US is certainly a paper tiger. As insignificant as the Iraq conflict is when compared to past conflicts, it is forgotten that we were the oil supply for the free world during WWII and were insignificant importers by the Vietnam era. We made our own stuff and could afford a huge conflict. We can't anymore and our administration is probably cogniscent of this fact. Most individuals aren't. There is no way we could pull off a large scale war again. There isnt the energy or finances to do this. Our determination hasn't failed us, but our economic might has.

Fuck, if we are forced to borrow 2.1billion dollars a day from our potential enemies, err strategic competitors, who in the world could we turn to to battle China for the last drops of oil?? China. Yeah right. It's like Germany or Japan trying to finance their warmaking efforts by selling bonds to the US.

If push came to shove, China will win a resource war over middle eastern oil. Our balls are caught in their vise and were at their mercy not to squeeze too hard. We could of course preemptively nuke them, but they more than likely could return the favor. In that case we'd take the express train back to the stone age as a result.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 05:51:57

In WWII we supplied our side with oil, we had the guts to ration gas at home, and we worked all out to win. Oh, and we got our asses handed to us in the early WWII years too. By the Germans and by the Japanese. But we kept fighting and won - much of it by denying the other side their oil supplies.

You know when 9-11 happened I thought maybe I'd be growing tomatoes and chard on my balcony and reporting for bandage-rolling and supplies-packing duties at the local high school at nights. I thought this might be the new WWII. Instead, it's being done like Vietnam, everything's just hunky-dory at home, while working class kids are used for cannon fodder. And screwing things up so thoroughly that the 3/4 of the Iraquis who'd be on our side if we did things right, are instead joining the Jihadists. And you can't blame 'em given the circumstances.

Like Rome, in the early days of their Empire they were ass kickers and name-takers, in the decline days they used their lower class and immigrants to do their halfhearted fighting and gradually their Empire fell.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Jake_old » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 07:53:30

I_Like_Plants wrote

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n WWII we supplied our side with oil, we had the guts to ration gas at home, and we worked all out to win. Oh, and we got our asses handed to us in the early WWII years too. By the Germans and by the Japanese. But we kept fighting and won - much of it by denying the other side their oil supplies.


Good point, it was a defensive war for us, and the adversaries were well matched technologically.

The new war is about global dominance, in other words, oppression.

By depriving nations of stability, we ensure our continued dominance in trade and ideology. We lose our dominance without cheap energy and as we here know, this will happen at the hand of nature, not terrorists.

It will be blamed on the terrorists though.

It will make WWII look like a picnic.IMO.
Jake_old
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Luton, England
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 11:24:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', '
')If push came to shove, China will win a resource war over middle eastern oil. Our balls are caught in their vise and were at their mercy not to squeeze too hard. We could of course preemptively nuke them, but they more than likely could return the favor. In that case we'd take the express train back to the stone age as a result.

Not to hijack the thread, but as a quick note.

China really isnt well prepared for retalitory strikes. Their missles are liquid fuel, they HAVE to be prepped before launch. Their submarines are old and clank around like a bolt in a bucket in the water.
If we were to strike first our opening move would be having our 688's send a torpedo right up the ass of every Chinese boomer out there, quickly followed by a laucch of our nuclear assets at key critical stuctures of the Chinese.
This is one reason the Chinese cannot effectively launch undetected at us. We would pick up the ICBM prework being performed and know they are getting ready.

Essentially, if we strike first China would never see it coming until it was too late to do anything about it.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby Jake_old » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 11:51:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f we were to strike first our opening move would be having our 688's send a torpedo right up the ass of every Chinese boomer out there, quickly followed by a laucch of our nuclear assets at key critical stuctures of the Chinese.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ssentially, if we strike first China would never see it coming until it was too late to do anything about it.


Phew, thats good then. :)

Do you suppose our leaders talk of using nukes this freely? I expect they do, screwed up!
Jake_old
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Luton, England
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby oiless » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 22:46:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', ' ')As insignificant as the Iraq conflict is when compared to past conflicts, it is forgotten that we were the oil supply for the free world during WWII and were insignificant importers by the Vietnam era. We made our own stuff and could afford a huge conflict.


Heck, the USA supplied Germany with oil for a good portion of WWII, and you still won.
User avatar
oiless
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 24 Aug 2005, 23:18:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he American people no longer have the spine to see a job through to the end.


This wasn't the job of the American people to begin with. We had no business in Iraq. My uncle, who is stationed there, appears to agree.


So you use the opinion of 1 individual stationed in Iraq and think this reflects the feelings of the group?

Now, whether it was the job of the American people or not is a whole different ballgame. One I wont play at this time. :-D


I'm sure many who would agree with Toecutter's uncle, can't reply as some are too braindamaged, deaf, or sucking their dinner through a straw, to respond.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Paper Tigers?

Unread postby katkinkate » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 06:05:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'I') think OBL is right, he may be ugly but he ain't dumb. And look at how every war since WWII went for us, worn down to a standstill every time at best.

WWII was a bit different, lots of blood relatives over there in Europe under threat, plus legitimate fears of the Japanese on the west coast. And soldiers who were used to doing with very little during the Depression, already used to hunger etc.


And the Europeans, Russians and ANZACS had already tired out Germany and her alies by forcing them to fight on several fronts and they ran out of oil.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron