Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 13:04:47

OK, let's go thru this:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')So for instance vastly complex system of food production and distribution will end.


When this ends, cities larger than 350 000 Max become
uninhabitable. Period. Two days after the last regularly scheduled truckload of groceries was due to arrive.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'M')uch of our suburbia is really only a network to isolate the citizenry from resources, production, and ownership and its take vast amounts of money to maintain this bondage.

So an entity will disappear and be replaced with something different;


Money is debt is energy growth. W/o energy growth
debt repayment is impossible and so the formation of the following
(which we're doing now,btw, will be impossible)
Mega-farms>

giant regional processing facilities (slaughter houses, massive grain dryers and silos)>

manufacturing and packaging plants>

JIT food highway>warehouse>highway>convenience stores>feeder road>house>stomach

>shitter


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'C')omplex systems need constant infusions of energy to hold together--otherwise they shake, rattle, and roll and eventually change state: think steam to water to ice. This is called phase change and may happen on the national, regional, local level. Hard to predict when it happens because underlying topography is hard to measure.

New orders appear at lower energy levels.

--Permaculture communities,
--isolated wealthy farm towns
--prisons,
--re-invigorated small towns,
--gated communities and city islands
--massive unemployment in a big city is still another. Think hordes of people moping about in long wood coats, crappy broken shoes, and tin cans as cups and lots of mush.
--malls turned into flophouses and barracks


But aside from the malls (which are being abandoned CRE
Crisis as we speak, we've got the above now).

As energy ROEI, depletion and crushing of demand becomes
Non Linear, so will the Phase Change. And as we've waited
til now instead of moving on this in 1980, the Time Wall is now
upon us. As we move into this phase change we will realize
per Orlov, that indeed the Russians were better prepared for
Collapse than we were.

Just an example. There will be Wholesale change of our 'Leaders'
as we hang the $MultiTrillion of fraud around their necks. Our Empire will collapse. Our Military will be stranded overseas.
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 14:50:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '
')When this ends, cities larger than 350 000 Max become
uninhabitable.



Why such a large number? Even very tiny towns get virtually all their food from central locations and have very little stored. Most people in the country get their food at the store just like city people.

The largest cities of the past (up to 1 million) were closely surrounded by intensive farms which delivered food to the city daily. Ever other small town either had food mostly brought in by wagon (and later, train) as in western US pioneer towns, or were again surrounded by dense farmland.

So I'm not sure what's magical about 350,000 people. :?:
Ludi
 

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 17:22:09

Always the optimist, pstarr! :)
Ludi
 

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Loki » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 17:48:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mcgowanjm', '
')When this ends, cities larger than 350 000 Max become
uninhabitable.



Why such a large number? Even very tiny towns get virtually all their food from central locations and have very little stored. Most people in the country get their food at the store just like city people.

The largest cities of the past (up to 1 million) were closely surrounded by intensive farms which delivered food to the city daily. Ever other small town either had food mostly brought in by wagon (and later, train) as in western US pioneer towns, or were again surrounded by dense farmland.

So I'm not sure what's magical about 350,000 people. :?:


I live in a metro area of 2 million. We have lots of farmland around thanks in part to fairly strict land-use planning. I'm thinking I'd like to start an organic farm in the next 2-5 years, probably in this area. It's a great market now thanks to booming interest in local foods and organics, but even if we descend into a Greater Depression, people will still need to eat. And the closer I am to my market, the less I'll have to spend on transportation fuel, which may be a major consideration if we see $10/gal.

On the other hand there are plenty of little villages in the desert that will dry up into ghost towns.

Totally depends on where you live and what kind of DOOM we have in store for us. I think a Great Depression is far more likely than zombie hordes so I'm planning accordingly.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 17:59:44

Some metro areas have lots of farmland around - the metro area I'm closest to has a lot of potential farmland but very few farmers. I don't think many people will want to go into farming just because people need food. Folks like to be paid for their work, especially work as hard and expensive as farming.
Ludi
 

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Loki » Sun 28 Mar 2010, 20:24:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'S')ome metro areas have lots of farmland around - the metro area I'm closest to has a lot of potential farmland but very few farmers. I don't think many people will want to go into farming just because people need food.

I want to. :)
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 29 Mar 2010, 12:24:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', '
')I want to. :)



For free?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 29 Mar 2010, 15:02:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')People will pay to eat with whatever they have. Including their homes, land, and clothing off their backs.



So once they have nothing, then what?

People certainly don't need to go into farming to eat. They could just have a garden.

There's also the problem you have brought up in the past of land ownership. It will be tough for people to go into farming without some farmland they own or can use. Nobody around here is giving away free farmland. Maybe they are up in your neck of the woods, but last I heard, it costs hundreds of thousands of dollars for a hundred acres or so up there. :?

I guess I'm just doubtful of this army of new farmers that will spring into existence just because folks need them. :( Farming is hard and not many people want to do it, or even know how to do it. Food comes from the store for most people, not from the dirt.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Loki » Mon 29 Mar 2010, 16:58:36

Ludi, I didn't say anything about farming for free. There is currently a booming demand for local organic food. I'm thinking of supplying that demand with a small farm business. Look at me, I'm a capitalist! I'll be working on someone else's farm for at least a year first to learn the ropes, though---I start in just a few weeks!

I came across a very cool graph while poking around at the Oil Drum the other day. Jason Bradford shows a strong correlation between per capita energy consumption and the percentage of the workforce in agriculture. It's really striking (see below).

If we assume that per capita energy consumption will go down in the US in the near future, we can hypothesize that more people will be required to do agricultural work in order to feed our population. Many will bitch and moan about it, no doubt, but it beats starving. Gardens can only provide so much food.

The land question is a problem, I don't have any easy solutions. Perhaps a Stalinist dictatorship and forced agricultural collectivization :wink:

Image
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Near-Term Systemic Implications of a Peak in Global Oil Prod

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 29 Mar 2010, 17:20:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'm')ore people will be required to do agricultural work in order to feed our population.


Who is going to pay for that?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'G')ardens can only provide so much food.


Gardens are much more productive for unit area than farms.
Ludi
 
Top

Previous

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

cron