Peak Oil
Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

My days as a doomer might be over

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.
Post a reply

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 10 Apr 2008, 14:22:17

I know, "Doom, the Musical!" It might help if all the comments here were condensed into hummable perky lyrics.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby JRP3 » Thu 10 Apr 2008, 15:04:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')The electricity that is saved just gets used elsewhere to keep the growth juggernaut moving. Jevon's paradox.


That's the whole point. The electricity saved powers EV's without increasing grid capacity. There is also less mercury in CFLs than is produced by the electricity used to power incandescents during their lifespan. Not to mention recycling of CFLs.
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 10 Apr 2008, 23:18:42

Huh? Your post makes little sense.

The power saved gets used elsewhere, for a net saving of zero. The power plants keep humming and producing their mercury, and the CFLs contribute their own, new source of mercury.

That doesn't sound like progress to me.

Mercury is one of the most deadly poisons around. Billions of CFLs will add large amounts in aggregate. Most will never be recycled, but will end up broken in landfills, on roadsides, and on floors.

It would be better to stick with incandescents but to use far FEWER of them, and to lower the wattage.

Unfortunately, our civilization doesn't do FEWER or LESS.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby JRP3 » Thu 10 Apr 2008, 23:54:29

I guess we are arguing different points. I'm saying there are 2 possibilities:
1. Keep using incandescents and build more power plants to power EV's
or
2. Switch to CFL's and use existing power plants to power EV's.

EV's will become more numerous and they will need power. I say the grid can currently handle a large number of EV's without further increase, but if more power is needed more efficient use of the power we have can provide that power, including more efficient lighting.

I don't buy the mercury doomer stuff either. There is a very tiny amount of mercury in CFL's and recycling programs are already increasing. Not to mention that they last so much longer they won't need to be replaced very often. I've been using CFL's for over 5 years and I've only replaced 2 of the very early ones that frankly weren't that good.
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 02:27:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JRP3', '2'). Switch to CFL's and use existing power plants to power EV's.
Switching household use would free up ~75 billion kWh/year, or more via all lighting in the states, which is enough to power a trillion miles in Apteras/similar. Smaller efficient EVs would go farther on the same amount of electricity saved via efficiency increases outside of households, or some combo of both.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 03:07:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'I')'m not sure why you ask the first question. The US covers at least 4 time zones. That alone extends daytime travel and electricity use. Work and leisure goes on round the clock and long journeys are common (same here).
Oh, well, the point being that for most common use, the individual would return home the same day, and if their work prevented it, they simply wouldn't use an EV. Similarly, if someone w/ an EV wanted to use something for a longer trip, they could simply rent an ICE powered vehicle.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'I') still can't find that TheOilDrum post but I remember looking at this report (PDF) a few months ago: IMPACTS ASSESSMENT OF PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLES ON ELECTRIC UTILITIES. Though it was generally positive on the ability of the present grid to cope with PHEVs (not all-electric vehicles), it's pertinent to point out that the study concluded that 73% of the light duty vehicle fleet, as PHEVs, could be serviced by the current grid if they were charged in off-peak hours.
If you look at the graph on page nine, you'll notice that their energy use per mile is anywhere from about three to eight times that of the Aptera, and consequently, the battery cost per mile for the only appropriate chemistry given performance constraints I know of, lithium phosphate, would increase similarly. Spending $10,000 every ~150,000-200,000 miles in the case of the Aptera isn't so bad since that's less that what would be spent on gas in the most efficient gas offering, a Prius. Increase that by a factor three to eight and it turns into something that not only doesn't save money, but isn't affordable at all for most. Consequently, their impact on the grid is off by a factor of around four.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'T')his implies that for PHEVs a significant increase in capacity would be needed to cope with 100% of the LDV fleet.
Only if everyone is willing to shell out an about four times as much for battery and electricity costs. I don't think we can right now due to economic pressure right now, so that large of a load on the grid is moot IMO.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'I') think the point is moot, to some extent, because it will take a long time (possibly decades) to move to mainly PHEVs and, by then, fuel savings may be overtaken by oil production declines, so a further move to all-electric may be needed putting a strain on the grid that it may not be able to take (if it had not already succumbed to 100% PHEVs).
I think it's moot for some time, not because the grid couldn't handle it, but because of BIC. In order to maximize profit, alternatives need to be kept at arms length for as long as possible. That being said, it's only a matter of time IMO.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby TonyPrep » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 08:34:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', 'I') think it's moot for some time, not because the grid couldn't handle it, but because of BIC. In order to maximize profit, alternatives need to be kept at arms length for as long as possible. That being said, it's only a matter of time IMO.
Time is something we don't have a lot of, in this matter.

So, not only could the US grid not handle an all PHEV fleet, without a significant increase, with attendant worries about reliability (as per the report) but it most certainly couldn't handle a totally EV fleet and we can't possibly move to that quantity of EVs or PHEVs anyway. So electric or plug-in hybrids are not going to keep personal transportation going, in the current manner.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby JRP3 » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 09:57:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '[') So electric or plug-in hybrids are not going to keep personal transportation going, in the current manner.


I agree, nothing will. But they can keep some form of reduced personal transportation going. People will have to cut back no matter what, and if transportation is expensive enough, whatever the fuel, they will. I think it's obvious that the grid, as it is, can handle a large shift to EV's.
As far as time zones are concerned, the grid is not homogeneous. Plugging my car in at night in NY won't cause a drain in CA during peak time.
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 17:16:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'S')o, not only could the US grid not handle an all PHEV fleet, without a significant increase, with attendant worries about reliability (as per the report)
The report assumes we all have an extra $15,000 to throw at battery packs/electricity every few years, which is likely impossible.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'b')ut it most certainly couldn't handle a totally EV fleet and we can't possibly move to that quantity of EVs or PHEVs anyway. So electric or plug-in hybrids are not going to keep personal transportation going, in the current manner.
Of course they can't. But the current manner is purposely designed to be as wasteful as possible. Perpetuating that waste through electricity instead of liquid fuels won't do anything except make more money by having more people pay out the nose and move any "peaks" onto some other finite resource.

The only possible instantiation of electrics due to economics would be small efficient versions such as the Aptera. Assuming electrification of the current fleet is simply silly because the current fleet weighs in at around a twentieth of the weight of a fully loaded semi, but only gets two to three times the mileage. Conspicuous consumption? Yeah sure... The report you linked cannot be accurate due to economic constraints, unless we somehow miraculously becomes four times wealthier overnight.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 17:35:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gandalf_the_White', '
')I think that some of us actually don't care what happens in the future as long as society as we know goes up in flames.


Absolutely right, Gandalf!
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby TonyPrep » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 18:19:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JRP3', 'I') think it's obvious that the grid, as it is, can handle a large shift to EV's.
Yes, it probably can. What "large" actually means and the practicalities or probabilities of such a shift are open to debate.

Indeed, I don't foresee a huge shift to EVs within the next few years and probably not for at least a decade.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby FreddyH » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 21:36:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'T')his just highlights the fact peak oil is not really an energy problem it is a liquid fuel problem.

I see many alternatives in the medium to long term for low carbon energy such as 3rd and 4th generation nuclear, fusion, solar film, CSP, wind, tidal turbines. Wind kites, geothermal and hot rock. Plus, in general, gas and coal are plentiful.

The problem is not really energy. The problem is the reliance of transport on oil. If oil goes into decline soon (next 10 years or so) the potential discontinuities make plenty of doom scenarios plausible. I believe, however, that Campbell et al are overly pessimistic and URR is more likely to be around 2600 billion barrels so the decline will be more of a, gradually declining, bumpy plateau. High oil prices, economic problems but not the end of the world. Not yet anyway.


Your interpretation is one that is becoming more clear all things considered. As mentioned in another thread this week, the TrendLines Avg of the 23 production profile scenarios (with its 3.9-Tb URR) projects that this year's flow rate (87-mbd) will not be breached until 2029 AD ... reflecting a 92-mbd Peak in 2019.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby BigTex » Fri 11 Apr 2008, 23:01:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'Y')our interpretation is one that is becoming more clear all things considered. As mentioned in another thread this week, the TrendLines Avg of the 23 production profile scenarios (with its 3.9-Tb URR) projects that this year's flow rate (87-mbd) will not be breached until 2029 AD ... reflecting a 92-mbd Peak in 2019.


Freddy, can you dumb that down a little?

Are you saying that your projections show 87 mbd is the peak, or is it 92 mbd, and are you saying the peak will be in 2019, 2029 or some other year?

I'm not sure what "flow rate" means. Is that different from barrels per day?
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby FreddyH » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 01:24:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'Y')our interpretation is one that is becoming more clear all things considered. As mentioned in another thread this week, the TrendLines Avg of the 23 production profile scenarios (with its 3.9-Tb URR) projects that this year's flow rate (87-mbd) will not be breached until 2029 AD ... reflecting a 92-mbd Peak in 2019.


Freddy, can you dumb that down a little?

Are you saying that your projections show 87 mbd is the peak, or is it 92 mbd, and are you saying the peak will be in 2019, 2029 or some other year?

I'm not sure what "flow rate" means. Is that different from barrels per day?


The Avg indicates Peak Rate will be 92 in 2019 and All Liquids will decline back to 87 in 2029. The insinuation that substantial energy replacement or substitution is required on the short term seems to be misguided according to the projections by the globe's recognized geologists and analysts.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 05:02:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he Avg indicates Peak Rate will be 92 in 2019 and All Liquids will decline back to 87 in 2029. The insinuation that substantial energy replacement or substitution is required on the short term seems to be misguided according to the projections by the globe's recognized geologists and analysts.
So, you think production will never go below 87 mbpd, until 2029, but will only get to 92 mbpd by 2019. That's an average growth rate of 0.5% per year. I think it's a matter of opinion whether that woeful growth rate can meet the demand placed on it by growing economies. However, recessions can dent that demand. The question is: will we have recessions because there is no substantial replacement for the gap represented by such a slow production growth rate, or because of some completely unrelated economic condition?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby manu » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 11:57:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'T')he Avg indicates Peak Rate will be 92 in 2019 and All Liquids will decline back to 87 in 2029. The insinuation that substantial energy replacement or substitution is required on the short term seems to be misguided according to the projections by the globe's recognized geologists and analysts.
So, you think production will never go below 87 mbpd, until 2029, but will only get to 92 mbpd by 2019. That's an average growth rate of 0.5% per year. I think it's a matter of opinion whether that woeful growth rate can meet the demand placed on it by growing economies. However, recessions can dent that demand. The question is: will we have recessions because there is no substantial replacement for the gap represented by such a slow production growth rate, or because of some completely unrelated economic condition?


I would say the world is in a recession right now. When 38 countries are facing critical food shortages. It will hit all countries shortly.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby LastViking » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 14:24:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'I') would say the world is in a recession right now. When 38 countries are facing critical food shortages. It will hit all countries shortly.

That is plain rubbish. Global Real GDP is currently 2.25% ... and not a single g-20 nation is in Recession.
User avatar
LastViking
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon 19 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: British Virgins
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 18:13:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LastViking', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'I') would say the world is in a recession right now. When 38 countries are facing critical food shortages. It will hit all countries shortly.

That is plain rubbish. Global Real GDP is currently 2.25% ... and not a single g-20 nation is in Recession.
Are you talking technically or practically? Two consecutive quarters of contraction is technical recession but that means waiting until specific dates to calculate. The US was close to recession in the last quarter of last year and New Zealand had negative growth in one recent month (I forget which). Are there any figures for rolling quarters (the most recent three months)?

Do you have the most recent figures for the G20 countries and do you think recessions in other countries doesn't matter?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby manu » Mon 14 Apr 2008, 03:52:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LastViking', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'I') would say the world is in a recession right now. When 38 countries are facing critical food shortages. It will hit all countries shortly.

That is plain rubbish. Global Real GDP is currently 2.25% ... and not a single g-20 nation is in Recession.


I hope that you can talk to some people somewhere on the street, instead of gulping up the slop numbers that TPTB feed the masses from their bubble.
User avatar
manu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 751
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: My days as a doomer might be over

Unread postby Dezakin » Mon 14 Apr 2008, 17:06:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LastViking', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'I') would say the world is in a recession right now. When 38 countries are facing critical food shortages. It will hit all countries shortly.

That is plain rubbish. Global Real GDP is currently 2.25% ... and not a single g-20 nation is in Recession.


I hope that you can talk to some people somewhere on the street, instead of gulping up the slop numbers that TPTB feed the masses from their bubble.

Oh thats right, anecdotes for the win.

Find 10 people that are doing poorly and you can find 10 people that are doing great. It doesn't tell you crap about the state of the economy, and neither does ranting about 'TPTB' or venturing off into conspiracy land.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



cron