Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Most Dangerous Cities USA now... And Post Peak?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 23 Nov 2005, 14:43:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gnm', '
')And basically I'm real damn sick of them taking my money.

:-x
-G


I couldn't agree with you more. :cry:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby foodnotlawns » Wed 23 Nov 2005, 14:55:17

Corporate welfare is worse than poor-fare, IMHO. It definitely distorts the market and turns the plutocrat class into the kleptocrat class. It's outright stealing of the rich from the poor.

The fat cats use non-Whites for cheap labor and to keep society disordered. Multiculturalism is their latest weapon against ordinary folks. It's very strange that Leftists support it, but I think that Leftists are very warped and sick human beings.

An all White country would be able to force national socialist democracy -- strong trade unions, cradle to grave welfare state, sensible policies.

Multicultism keeps the plutocrat class very strong. Also, multicultism is a favorite fetish of the dominant ethnic/religious group of the plutocrat class.
User avatar
foodnotlawns
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Trindelm » Wed 23 Nov 2005, 15:11:24

Diversity is not a problem. Diversity is as American as Pizza, Tandoori wraps or General Gao's Chicken. Many great American success stories contain people from other countries who faced and withstood against all odds to make somethingof themselves be it a decent steady job or president of a Fortune 500 company. Such qualities should be welcomed and encouraged.

Multiculturalism is a problem not Diversity. Perhaps I'm splitting hairs here. At face value it sounds great, accept all people for what they are and do not judge. But what it does is balkanize people into various groups and levels in the social strata.
Harmonization is key, new concepts and are brought in to stir things up but eventually settle down thus making the larger population stronger and hence more adaptable.
I would use assimilate but instead many people especially the ultra left think of this as tactics adopted from the Borg.
Trindelm
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby lorenzo » Thu 24 Nov 2005, 09:57:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gnm', 'I')'m going to have to disagree with you Lorenzo, it generally isn't white vs. black shootings in those tough areas. Sadly the single biggest threat to a young black man in the urban ghettos is another of the same. I think it has little to do with race and everything to do with poverty really.

-G


Sure, but that's only business as usual. The person who started the thread, spoke about "eruptions" though, not business as usual, evoking the age old discourse of angst, so typical of white americans, who have always felt threatened, subconsciously, by the black hordes.

In reality, when there's a real social crisis induced by PO (I don't think it will ever come to this, but let's suppose it will), then I think it's a plausible scenario to see black people from the ghettos, venting their anger against white americans. Collective anger often gets fueled or channeled by ethnic discourses, and often contains identity issues. It's easy to have a single target.

The point I was trying to make is that if we see such "eruptions", then it will be a bloodbath, because both parties have guns. That's the danger. When ethnic tensions break out in gunless societies, we see people burning cars, and shouting slogans, at worst. When they break out in societies where each household has a rifle and a kalashnikov, we're in trouble. 8O

You point to ordinary every day violence in the ghetto. I was more pointing to Leaf's prediction of mass social unrest and violent "eruptions" of the black hordes. These are two very different things.
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Doly » Thu 24 Nov 2005, 10:06:59

Racist outbreaks happened in the seventies and they are likely to happen again. It's the sad reality.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby shakespear1 » Thu 24 Nov 2005, 10:08:55

Few remember or know how those riots looked. Few probable know what was going on during them. :?
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby hoplite » Thu 24 Nov 2005, 17:26:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leaf', '.').. People live in comfy land and comfy land isnt going to last much longer.
10 years post peak oil...many silly notions will fall by the way!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ew remember or know how those riots looked. Few probable know what was going on during them
Take a look at New Orleans...wasnt the white people shoting at rescue workers, raping and killing 10 year old girls, looting Plasma TV's in 4ft of water...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen the US. Economic breakdown happens this will lead quickly to riots and civil unrest. The military will be called on to control the rioting, and fail. The looters will take all the guns and ammunitions from stores they can find. Food supplies will be curtailed as truckers will be afraid to deliver to the stores. The stores will be raided and then burnt to the ground. Firefighters will be unable to respond as bullets fly. The US could look like one big New Orleans. The rest of the world will watch in horror as the US descends into utter chaos.


Most liberals (I use the term perjoratively as the definition of "liberal" has become so twisted, what we really mean when we say "liberal" is socialist, ie; someone who wants to help the underclass with with YOUR money) are completely unaware of the self segregation that has been created by the silly "multicultural" "all cultures" are equal argument. THe fact is, they are not. Look at Arab culture- they are still stuck in the 8th Century, look at their treatment of women, infidels, etc. Their culture, their "Islamic" law keeps them in an uncompetitive state vis a vis for example, the CHinese and will continue to do so until they change.

When my great grandfather (mothers side) came to the US. The first thing he did (after passing a health screen and proving he had a sponsor at Ellis Island) was to change his name to a more "american" sounding one. This was the quintesential American trait that made us so strong. People used to put their "American" identity first, and the old country second. Most immigrant families eschewed their mother tongue from the start so that their children could assimilate. This is not the case now. I know it really pisses people off to say this, but in my opinion, American melting pot culture is superior to the liberal notion of "celebrating diversity". Now, thanks to the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (and other communist groups) we have the Balkanization of America.

The problems in "Black" culture (if thats what you want to call it) are so severely ingrained that they are literally committing genocide on themselves. I read somewhere that the number one cause of death for a black male between 14-28 is murder- BY ANOTHER BLACK MALE! The crime statistics collected by the FBI are another eye opener, if the roles were reversed (perpetrator vs common victims) the entire world would be in an uproar over the perceived racism- but since the overwhelming majority of victims are white- it's a non-issue.

Other questions you must ask if you are serious about addressing the "black culture" problem include nutrition. It's clear that blacks have lower life expectancy rates than all other races. BUt how can you address the real world efects of that? Insurance companies are acutely aware of this, and this is what black activists are talking about when they say there is still "institutionalized racism" yes it is racists, but these are CAPITALISTS and they KNOW they are likely to face higher costs associated with behavioural (cultural choices) so, they may find ways to charge them more in their own self interest independent of any "racism" from their perspective.
User avatar
hoplite
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri 22 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Falstaff » Tue 29 Nov 2005, 12:30:04

Wooot; that pretty much settles it...

Nothing says hypocrite better than liberals who put their children in private school (after they realize what "diversity really means)...
User avatar
Falstaff
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby trespam » Tue 29 Nov 2005, 13:43:10

Some of you folks are so damn stupid and ignorant sometimes. Not a word about slavery. Not a word about tradition. Not a word about a race pulled up from its family and cultural roots, sold like property, worked to the bone, and thrown away like garbage. Not a word about the importance of family traditions and the values that are passed down through families. And the problems that will develop when those values are completely emasculated and gutted by ripping the communities apart and throwing what remains of the voyages onto plantations to work as slaves.

It is not just poverty. If you believe at all in traditions, in cultural and family traditions, if you believe at all in nurture as well as nature, then you will have to admit that ripping apart a people may leave scars. Excuses? Sometimes it will be used as excuses. But scars all the same. And they take time to heal.

The idiotic racists who post their garbage should be banned from this site. Remember: an open forum will degrade to the lowest common denominator in many cases. We have found it. The idiot from the Ukraine and his supporters.
User avatar
trespam
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Kramerchi » Wed 30 Nov 2005, 14:04:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falstaff', 'W')ooot; that pretty much settles it...

Nothing says hypocrite better than liberals who put their children in private school (after they realize what "diversity really means)...


Good one. Oooh oooh! I got one (or several)!

...or a conservative who votes against every tax increase and then cries and whines about taxes (they do a lot of that) but then is first in line for unemployment/socialsecurity/medicaid/medicare when their job gets outsourced to China-Walmart or they become disabled...or a CEO who expects Uncle Sam to upkeep the infrastructure of this country when it is used disproportionately by his company while also sheltering his companies' assets in overseas banks to prevent tax responsibility. Or or...a large auto company dumping all it's pension burden on the federal government- pensions of people who were probably too proud to ever claim government benefits now have to...mmmmm....hypocrisy smells like chicken...

We can go on and on- but the real problem is that everyone in this country thinks that he/she knows everything. That is NOT a liberal trait. Conservatives spew the same level of toxic innaccuracies that liberals do. It's funny to watch them try to act like they know better- a little elitist guys? By the way, the right-left distinction (which conservatives are soooooooo preoccupied with) has its roots in French Pariliament. What an insult!

No, the problem in America is we have a culture of people who think they are entitled to everything (whether it be poor people on welfare or rich people addictied to oil in the middle east). The poor have nothing to lose and everything to gain- that is why racists/elitists are so afraid- because they have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

Poor, poor rich conservatives and liberals- they are so misunderstood. I really feel for them. If only the poor were one-half as enlightened as the good kind hearted conservatives and liberals of the world- they would probably be enlightened too.

The racists on this board are racist because they've only presented "fact" by ommitting other KEY variables- like poverty, unemployment, etc. It is also soooo easy for whiteys to say "tough luck about slavery guys- get over it" or "it must be ingrained in their culture to be violent and kill each other." I guess they conveniently forget about the pastey Hitlers, Milosevic's, and Stalins of the world. It's also like white people think they are all of a sudden Ghandis with guns...you are foolish if you think race will make a difference in large populations of people who are starving. Man, just plain fooolish. It only points to how spoiled Americans are now (and I don't mean the poor black people).

If anything, I would put my money on being in a community of people who are used to living without anything except for their communities- peak oil and shrinking resources will mean nothing to them because that's all they've known...while white people go on and on crying (or shooting people trying to protect whatever they got) about all the SUV's and Plasma TV's they lost and all their stock options that are meaningless...

-Kramerchi
User avatar
Kramerchi
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Gil-Galad » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 06:10:31

Beg to disagree, one of the best places will be South Africa, wonderful climate in the area around Cape Town, you can grow anything. The population of Sub Saharan Africa will shortly go into decline due to the AIDs epidemic which, I believe is actually worse than we are being told.
User avatar
Gil-Galad
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Doly » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 08:20:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gil-Galad', 'B')eg to disagree, one of the best places will be South Africa, wonderful climate in the area around Cape Town, you can grow anything. The population of Sub Saharan Africa will shortly go into decline due to the AIDs epidemic which, I believe is actually worse than we are being told.


And with the best chances for race riots anywhere in the world, as well. Not sure it's ideal, thank you very much.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby hoplite » Thu 22 Dec 2005, 22:49:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gil-Galad', '.') The population of Sub Saharan Africa will shortly go into decline due to the AIDs epidemic which, I believe is actually worse than we are being told.


Or BETTER depending on how you look at it; I think AIDS is a godsend insofar as the survival of western civilization is concerned. Besides, AIDS is a behavioural problem, change the behaviour and the "epidemic" is OVER. That quick. But I think your mistaken if you think EuroAfricans will be safe, their fate will be the same as the white Rhodesians...
User avatar
hoplite
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri 22 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Jenab6 » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 10:23:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('orz', 'N')ice job ignoring the economics. Race, poverty and crime go hand in hand. A poor person from a poor, crime-ridden neighborhood probably ain't going to do too well in school and get the grades and money to move up. Not too many blacks get a chance to be raised in suburbia like whites or asians, and the few I've met wouldn't pocket gum from a convenience store. You find a statistic saying middle class blacks commit more felonies than middle class whites and then we'll start talking about race.

The case you're making is to not be in any city that is full of poor people, which is pretty obvious.

And considering you're european, I don't even see why you should even care.

I frequently hear a liberal (or a non-White) saying something like this:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he leading cause of criminal behaviour is poverty.

I'm sorry, but that's false. In 1995, the resident population of the United States included 218.3 million Whites and 33.1 million Blacks. Of those, 11.2% of the Whites and 29.0% of the Blacks lived below the federal poverty line. There were, therefore, 24.4 million poor Whites and 9.5 million poor Blacks living in the United States, that year. Poor Whites outnumbered poor Blacks by a ratio of 2.57 to one.

If poverty were the leading cause of criminal behavior, as you say, then for each 100 murders committed by Blacks in 1995, about 257 murders would have been committed by Whites. But that's not what happened. About 55% of US murders in 1995 were committed by Blacks, meaning that for each 100 murders committed by Blacks that year, only 82 murders were committed by all non-Black groups combined.

Even if you were to assume that Whites committed all of the murders in the United States that Blacks did not commit, the Whites could only be responsible, at most, for 82 murders for each 100 murders committed by Blacks. The observed facts contradict the prediction implicit in the liberal notion that poverty causes crime, and therefore the liberal notion is wrong. The much blandished "poverty causes crime" hypothesis is a myth.

There are other ways of demonstrating the same thing. The two most rural states in the United States are West Virginia and Mississippi. That is, both states are more-or-less comparable in the socioeconomic sense. But the two states differ demographically, with West Virginia being less than 5% Black, whereas Mississippi is about 36% Black. It comes as no surprise, to someone who has studied race for long, that Mississippi has a far higher rate of violent crime than West Virginia does.

If you think that the comparison is atypical, then feel free to replace West Virginia with any other, mostly rural, state-sized region having fewer than 5% of Blacks in its population. Or feel free to replace Mississippi with any other, mostly rural, state-sized region having more than one-third of Blacks in its population. You'll get the same answer every time.

http://www.jabpage.org/images/correlate2.jpg

Then, try comparing cities instead of rural areas, and examine that side of the rural-urban spectrum. The same pattern emerges, regardless of the degree of urbanization. Cities with high percentages of resident Blacks have high per capita rates for violent crime. Cities that are nearly all-White have low rates for violent crime. Contrast, for example, Detroit with St. Paul. Or Washington DC with Colorado Springs. Or Atlanta with Anchorage. If it's too much work to check, don't worry: I've already done it for you.

http://www.jabpage.org/images/uscitymu.jpg

You can carry the comparison to counties (subdivisions within a state), and the same thing goes. You can go outside North America to get your comparison regions: it's not just an American thing. Choose Johannesburg. Choose Haiti. Choose Rwanda. It doesn't matter.

Poor Whites do not behave as badly as poor Blacks do. The data are so clear on that point that no liberal has ever been able to cherrypick his way out of it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('trespam', 'S')ome of you folks are so damn stupid and ignorant sometimes. Not a word about slavery. Not a word about tradition. Not a word about a race pulled up from its family and cultural roots, sold like property, worked to the bone, and thrown away like garbage. Not a word about the importance of family traditions and the values that are passed down through families. And the problems that will develop when those values are completely emasculated and gutted by ripping the communities apart and throwing what remains of the voyages onto plantations to work as slaves.

The idea that Blacks are unique as a people having a history as slaves is yet another myth upon which liberals build their theories. It's pure fiction. Lots of White people were enslaved in ancient times. Julius Caesar killed millions of Celts and enslaved millions more. After Caesar was finished, the Saxons became the Celt's overlords in Britain. In Spain, Whites were dominated by Arabs. In Eastern Europe, the Slavs were under the heel of the Mongols, the Turks, the Communist Party, and others, at various times.

In colonial America there were very many White slaves. Some historians estimate that the White slaves were more numerous than the Black slaves were. And worked harder, with less regard for whether they survived their indentures or not.

When a period of slavery is finished, it usually doesn't take long for a free people to rebound to their potential. Are Blacks some kind of exception? Not really, I think. They're just not the kind of people that liberals expect they should be. The liberal doctrine of racial equality leads liberal expectations astray.

And why should we expect that different races would be equal in all of the socially important ways? Nature made each race what it is. And nature has never been under any compulsion to make them all equal. And the odds of equality happening by chance are so small as to be negligible. So...what motivates the liberal adherance to this strange doctrine?

I think that liberals are people who have confused the proper roles of perception, reason, and moral sense. Thoughtful people assess the world by perception and by reason. Only when they learn what they are "up against" do they turn to their moral sense in order to decide what should be done. And their notions of "what should be done" is always circumscribed by "what can be done."

Not so for liberals. Liberals assess the world by their moral sense alone. They form sort of a religion around their moral judgments, such that facts in conflict with them must be (and are) ignored and denied, and anybody who doesn't play along with their fantasies gets called nasty names and screamed at and treated to bombastic sanctimony.

Jerry Abbott
User avatar
Jenab6
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun 25 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby spudbuddy » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 14:28:41

I wonder,
How good with numbers can a liberal be?
As Mr. Dylan once said, You're gonna have to serve somebody....
And certain people somewhere do quite well dividing and conquering.
Let us all bicker and bitch -
and ponder history a little bit.
Ironic isn't it? That so many famous place names bear aboriginal words (whose meanings have frittered away.)
Chicago, Toronto, Ontario, Pontiac, Minnesota, Ohio,
while a tiny little hamlet in eastern Iowa says it best: Lost Nation.
That's right.

Ponder for a bit, the sum total of money that has been made from the marriage of indigenous black culture with a more or less "Americanized" melt, soldered into what we now know as: Rock&Roll, Jazz, Blues, R&B, Rap, Hip Hop,
modern dance...
The point is, the entire history of modern western music (popular world-wide) is based on what the griots first handed down in West Africa long before Turtle Island became America, and gradually evolved a century ago into the roots of sound and rhythm (long before Motown was thought of) that would heat up adolescent hormones in astonishing ways.

This is all old news.
What is somewhat newer - is the simple fact that a culture has been founded on thievery. (the understanding of that event is what I speak of.)

When simple people lose sight of this fact (or never gained cognizance to begin with) then they fail to understand the deepest rages and resentments that boil beneath the surface.
American modernity has been a sort of armistice, rather a truce, really, for some time now.
The American Dream Machine dictated that a paltry few would, and could cash in on the corporate buyout, while the vast majority remained much as they have always been.

What does all this have to do with poverty, despair, hopelessness, and especially crime?
Go ask the streetkids in the cities of Bangladesh. Find a translator. Pay attention to what they say. It's all the same shit.

How, in 2006, can one man tell another that somehow the color of his skin will dictate his morality, his spirituality, his obedience, his fidelity, his very dreams?
What have we learned, at all?
Is a Jew less crime-prone for his Jewishness?
Why is it that we just know in our bones that in the history of this sad little planet, an Asian or European was never going to come up with, all on his own, the soul-lifting release of a simple drum-beat? (Tibetan bells notwithstanding.)

Is a black man a better man for dancing through twelve bars on silver strings, or propelling horsehide from a hickory Louisville slugger 500 feet over the left field wall? Of course not. That's just how he earns his living.
And although those men would declare themselves the lucky few, they never forget that there are millions more like them who will never have that opportunity - and not for lack of ability, desire, forebearance, discipline, or anything else...not even education.

Numbers - do not prove that one group of people are better than others.
All they prove is whatever agenda the number-cruncher has at the moment.
User avatar
spudbuddy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby dissimulo » Wed 04 Jan 2006, 15:50:52

Deleted - didn't realize I was responding to such an old post. It seemed kind of silly to resurrect it.
User avatar
dissimulo
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed 01 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 07 Jan 2006, 22:20:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'N')o, the racist remarks are highly interesting.

When these cities (ghettos) "erupt", the problem is that the White Man panicks, and takes out his war guns, while the black man does the same. And they start shooting each other. This is the history of the U.S. in a nutshell.

When ghettos like those around Paris erupt, you only see symbolic action, no guns (notwithstanding a few exceptions).

That's the big difference. The US is a racist society with guns. Which is of course much more troubling than having a racist society without guns.


I suppose that depends on the type of glasses your using to see through.
i dont consider torching thousands of cars and not doing anything about it as "symbolic", I see it as "surrender".
You think they would have had those problems if the general population of France was armed, and sitting on the lawn in a chair with a gun saying "You can torch any car you want, but torch MY car and it'll be the last car you torch"
Of course not. These rioters arent stupid, there not going to get gunned down trying to riot. They would either move to the next street, or stop rioting.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Most Dangerous Cities USA "now"... Imagine Pos

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 07 Jan 2006, 23:43:32

Gosh Leaf, Maybe the whites in West Virginia are all real nice to each other because they're all related. A Ukrainian hillbilly like yourself, no doubt knows what I mean. Deedle dee dum dee dum dee dum dee. Squeal like pig.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron