Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

M3 elimination - a bluff?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby falser » Tue 10 Jan 2006, 14:22:18

Quoting this article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is what I gleaned from the speech last night: Bernanke tells a story, that if an alchemist invented a way to make gold in unlimited quantities, then released this news to the world and said he was going to start making and selling unlimited amounts of gold, the price drop immediately, before the Alchemist made or sold a single ounce. He goes on to compare the Fed to that alchemist. He talks about the printing press, then says, "By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services."

Then it struck me - this elimination of M3 in March is the credible threat.. It's a bluff. First they juice M3 like it is the end of the world (or 1999), and then they turn the lights out on the statistics. Since we're all in the dark, the only thing we can assume is that the Fed is monetizing debt like there is no tomorrow. But they really don't want to do that -- it is not good for their balance sheet -- so instead they engineer this bluff. Everyone believes it, and they (we) act accordingly, bidding up stocks and gold.


This actually makes some sense. What easier way to devalue the dollar than to simply make everyone believe in a hyperinflationary scenario. The dollar does have to fall (to some degree) one way or another because the trade deficit isn't going to fix itself. In the past month or two the Fed has created some massive amounts of money, something on the order of 30% annualized rate. So why else would they bother doing so now instead of after March?
User avatar
falser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby dbarberic » Tue 10 Jan 2006, 17:08:42

For the life of me, I can't imagine how a bluff on removing M3 would be of any value. The author proposes that it was done to reduce the value of the dollar relative to other currencies, however, why even bother bluffing and why not just print the money. Printing the money is way more valuable to a government than bluffing that your going to print more money. When you print you get to monitize the debt, thus lowering it and it is an effective hidden tax on the citizens. Why lie about it and not just do it.

The author is selling, but I'm not buying.

For all practical purposes, the US is in a recession. The juicing of M3 the last few months is to keep things moving along and asset prices from falling (stocks/houses).

On a somewhat related topic; I was surfing around on Wikipedia and found a whole page on Hyperinflation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')overnments will often try to disguise the true rate of inflation through a variety of techniques. These can include the following:
-Outright lying as to official statistics such as money supply, inflation or reserves.
-Suppression of publication of money supply statistics, or inflation indices.
-Price and wage controls.
-Forced savings schemes, designed to suck up excess liquidity. These savings schemes may be described as pensions schemes, emergency funds, war funds, or similar.
-Adjusting the components of the Consumer Price Index, to remove those items whose prices are rising the fastest.


How many of these are the US Government doing?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')utright lying as to official statistics such as money supply, inflation or reserves.
A very interesting interview with John Williams on Financial Sense Online discusses how various presidential administrations manipulated Government stats to serve a political purpose.

http://www.financialsense.com/Experts/2 ... liams.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')uppression of publication of money supply statistics, or inflation indices.
The M3 Stat is gone as of March 2006.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')rice and wage controls.
Well we don't have those yet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')orced savings schemes, designed to suck up excess liquidity. These savings schemes may be described as pensions schemes, emergency funds, war funds, or similar.
I can not think of one that exists, yet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')djusting the components of the Consumer Price Index, to remove those items whose prices are rising the fastest.
In the mid 90's the Clinton administration modified the CPI to give more weight to lower priced components of the index. The net effect is a CPI which is understated by about 3%.

I guess three out of five isn't bad. I wonder how the other two will play out when they happen.
User avatar
dbarberic
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby Kingcoal » Tue 10 Jan 2006, 23:29:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('falser', 'Q')uoting this article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is what I gleaned from the speech last night: Bernanke tells a story, that if an alchemist invented a way to make gold in unlimited quantities, then released this news to the world and said he was going to start making and selling unlimited amounts of gold, the price drop immediately, before the Alchemist made or sold a single ounce. He goes on to compare the Fed to that alchemist. He talks about the printing press, then says, "By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services."

Then it struck me - this elimination of M3 in March is the credible threat.. It's a bluff. First they juice M3 like it is the end of the world (or 1999), and then they turn the lights out on the statistics. Since we're all in the dark, the only thing we can assume is that the Fed is monetizing debt like there is no tomorrow. But they really don't want to do that -- it is not good for their balance sheet -- so instead they engineer this bluff. Everyone believes it, and they (we) act accordingly, bidding up stocks and gold.


This actually makes some sense. What easier way to devalue the dollar than to simply make everyone believe in a hyperinflationary scenario. The dollar does have to fall (to some degree) one way or another because the trade deficit isn't going to fix itself. In the past month or two the Fed has created some massive amounts of money, something on the order of 30% annualized rate. So why else would they bother doing so now instead of after March?


Hair of the dog? In fighting the Euro you give the Euro exactly what it wants? I've heard this theory before. As the dollar goes down, European exporters have the choice of raising their prices or just eating the dollars sent to them. So far they have chosen the later. The Euro becomes more expensive at the same time making these same EU made products more expensive in Euros than dollars. Something like that. Economics is a very strange "science." I don't pretend to understand it, other than markets tend to do not what you think they will do.
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Top

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby Pfish » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 22:50:45

Is there a web site to track M3? Thanks!
"If what we had was a dog and pony show what we have now is a canine-equestrian extravaganza"
User avatar
Pfish
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Leucadia in the summer and Baja in the winter

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby dbarberic » Sat 14 Jan 2006, 12:28:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pfish', 'I')s there a web site to track M3? Thanks!


http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/
User avatar
dbarberic
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue 27 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby strider3700 » Mon 16 Jan 2006, 02:11:37

sort of an aside but how does the governement create new money? Two parts to the question. Do they literally print new dollars to cover newly created money or is lots of it purely electronic in nature these days? And what do they do with it when it's made? Do they just call up someone they owe money to and say here's that $100,000,000 we owe you do you want it in $100's or $20's or do they somehow distribute the money into banks and if so who decides who gets what and how?

I just was thinking that creating money isn't good enough you have to get it into the system and then either be very secretive and favour someone, find a way to spread it around or simply pay your bills with it but why anyone in their right mind would continue accepting it in the long run eludes me.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: M3 elimination - a bluff?

Unread postby Doly » Mon 16 Jan 2006, 09:12:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('strider3700', 's')ort of an aside but how does the governement create new money?


It's loaned from thin air. That is, some big player needs a huge loan. They ask the government for the money. They get it, but they have to pay it back. This is a simplification, but you get the idea.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron