by EnviroEngr » Sun 23 Jan 2005, 16:17:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')owante,
I have ever so much more predilection to view any system of human consciousness that organizes intention into bureaucracies and institutions as a death knell to future generations than my peers, that most often, there is very little common ground. It becomes, in the end, an issue of how we sift, winnow and sort perceptions into the grand mosaic we tacitly call Reality.
Living right amongst it day after day, I can see with an open, clear and courageous mind that preposterous levels of denial and avoidance exist in every corner and at every level of this society. It is remarkably "Stepford Wife"-like. In your plea for alertness and equanimity, I hear the same tone of urgency that I hear from within.
A cursory psychological overview of the lay of the land reveals childhoods and parenting wracked with myriad abuses and insidious indoctrinations -- what else can come of this other than that which is here now if the inner work and healing remains yet largely undone? Only clarity, critical thinking and astute living can begin to reveal the mysteries of the fears, joys, torments and triumphs that permeate all of our individual and collective lives.
I fully realize as I say all this, I'm leaving myself wide open as a tall lightning rod to get struck from any and all directions by high energy strokes. If need be, then so be it.
For the benefit of the critical reader, allow me to present some of my personal evolution with the implications of the topic of hominidic eco-parasitism, a wrinkle on the theme of "
The Tragedy of the Commons" by Garrett Hardin:
This material was coded up during a period in which I didn't have the time to edit and re-edit several drafts of dense material to get it flowable and within easy grasp of the general reader. Normally, when I dump raw streams of consciousness out like that and someone isn't the groove with me, they simply ask: "What did you mean by that??" (... a question I hear every day and from all kinds of people. Don't worry, it's
not an imposition.) I will gladly take any section of a blurb and expatiate on it so that it touches the person whose curiosity has been aroused but not sated. In my world, language is definitely important, but by far and away
more important is the
successful conveyance of idea or 'internal experience'. My concept of communication is to, as closely as possible, induce the same state of consciousness, sights, sounds, thoughts and feelings in my audience as I'm having.
Seemingly, the first paragraph was the most gnomic, and after re-reading the rest, although dense, it's reasonably intelligible. Time just isn't available like it used to be. I cipher with a tinge of regret and a duck-and-cover reflex, but I can always go back and decipher; if I lose the stream of consciousness, more likely than not, it will never return.
When time permits, I will rewind the tape back to last Summer and decode the missive to Rowante. Many will, no doubt, benefit and the investment may be worth the handful of awakenings that may result.
Thank you kindly for your patience and understanding.