by evilgenius » Sun 24 Apr 2022, 09:02:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'W')e WILL learn to live with less, either by way of thoughtful planning but more likely because we will eventually have less.
Re: west coast power. Less is coming because the climate there is reverting to a dryer cycle. California can either build more nuclear plants (earthquakes), import power from other areas (build nukes elsewhere), or reduce consumption. Hard to do when you want to ban ICE’s. The current trend seems to be to reduce consumption by depopulation.
A better trend for California would be to go to de-centralized power. That is to say, to conform to a hybrid model of power generation that still used big plants, but had plenty of locally produced solar to throw into the grid, plus some kind of storage.
I can't say that it was only the economics that prevented it.
There is something about the vast stretches of power transmission lines that are vulnerable to tree falls, among other things, that makes me think that a small town having enough local power generation such that it can at least form an expensive local market for power, is a good thing. Because that means they would be capable of doing without, if the system had to shut down preventatively.
Those types of shut downs, like for periods of high winds, don't require the local storage to completely run out. There could be a use for that market. You don't need to impose an emergency, so much as make sure that market functions according to whatever rules.
The people will still complain. It will, however, be a good thing that they do.
You do need something that can go longer than a couple of days. It has to be able to go a whole summer, if need be.
There could be line damage that has to be fixed. It could be a very windy year. You need storage. You need charging capacity.
You need to be able to separate certain elements, like traffic lights, from the grid. Let them be able to switch to local backup when the winds get so high that the power lines leading to the lights could arc. That separability will also help, by keeping statistics and allowing control, of power usage. It must apply to more than just traffic lights, you would think? A smarter grid, about itself?
It might mean asking people to cut down on daily use? After the pandemic, I don't know how much those who have to make these sorts of decisions can count on the public?
It isn't just the conspiracy theorists who became even more naked. Tucker Carlson is a goon. He has always been a goon. That's why he stands out now, as a goon.
What bow ties do for the right is that they make women think that a man is not threatening. A wise woman knows not to fall for that. Bees learn to go to where they find the most nectar, not necessarily to the brightest flower.
That just forces men to rethink their fashion choices, when it comes to making a statement about such things with their bow ties, right? We shouldn't just let him carpet bomb what it means to wear a bow tie, should we? I don't go for them, so I don't really know.
Seems like you'd wonder why some of those guys who have used the bow tie to their advantage, though, would have an opinion? Like, what's the equivalent of spilling something on your tie in the bow tie world? I can definitely hang with what it feels like to spill something on your tie at lunch and have to work the rest of the day with the stain around your neck.
Tucker should, at least, have to go through that.
Maybe it's when the clasp comes half undone, and you look like some character Jilly Stewart should have played, in black and white days. You know, all plucky and game. But no longer non-threatening. This is Jimmy when he is all riled up, and sets himself loose on the town to complain about his life. This Jimmy has a charismatic sort of power. All of his complaints are our complaints. Tucker needs to step out from behind Jimmy's shadow, and let the world judge him for themselves. Maybe he will wake up? Maybe he will find a new boss to goon for? Flash a smile? Disappear in smoke?