by Heineken » Thu 29 Jun 2006, 09:22:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'W')ith all due respect, Heineken, the gloomy predictions of the future are not inevitable. We've had people throughout history who believed that the world was going to end. It never did. The future is determined by our collective efforts. There are a lot of injustices in the world. One fights for them on an individual basis daily. This Peak Oil group should be fighting for a better future. Instead many here a giving up as we face the enormous challenge of depleting oil reserves and environmental degradation. . . . A population crash is not inevitable. This is an extreme view. Some argue that the world population will CREST (not crash) about the middle of this century before gradually declining.
With equal respect, Graeme, I would respond that your position is mostly wishful thinking. There's nothing wrong with that per se, of course, except to the degree that it blunts urgent action. A few specific reactions:
1. You state that "we've had people throughout history who believed that the world was going to end." Well, I don't maintain that the world is going to end, just that the human population is going to fall rather quickly to a much more modest level. Also, those "people throughout history" lived in a world with far fewer people and seemingly unlimited virgin resources. Their world wasn't even vulnerable to a dieoff (except through epidemics). Our world is exquisitely vulnerable.
2. Belief in the inevitability of a dieoff cannot necessarily be equated with "giving up." Quite the contrary. It could be a spur to real action, as opposed to the cosmetic and "lifestyle" measures currently being applied. However, human behavior and cultural institutions being what they are, it's unlikely any strong medicine will be taken until it's too late.
3. IMO, world population cannot simply "crest" and then hang there indefinitely or gently decline, because the resource base will have been too badly drained and poisoned; this is really the crux of the whole argument. PO will of course only accelerate and steepen the population crash. We can't indefinitely maintain the current population, much less the 9 billion that we may, if we're "lucky," reach by 2050.
4. Living in a nice place like New Zealand may distort one's Weltanschauung. I wonder if you've feel as optimistic about the demographic future if you lived in Nigeria or Pakistan.