by theluckycountry » Fri 19 Apr 2024, 12:40:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I') tell this story because I think it reects something in the society vernacular. We are smitten with "new". We think new means "better".
I see this argument in CC discussions. People, rightly, claim we can build new much more efficient houses. Which is true, intelligent design, site planning, and money can create a zero energy house. ...
As a society, culture, we have embraced " Ditch it, don't stitch it." And that is a problem. A big problem as our economy slows.
And those zero energy homes are never built unless it's a small enclave or a one off are they. You'll never see it in vast new estates.
As always, I follow the money. Who benefits? Banks, building industry suppliers, builders, real estate sales mobs, government from increased taxes. The industry is geared to feed money into these entities, at a maximum rate, the rational profit maximizer model all businesses run on now and you don't that by doing renos.
Again, your opinion that 'we' can build more efficient houses is true, but not in the overall sense of efficient. How 'efficient' is a zero energy house if it falls apart in 30 years? Plastic pipes instead of copper, manufactured cladding and flooring instead of bricks and hardwood? I was in the construction industry for a couple of decades, on the tools, and I saw it all from one end to the other. The only decent construction I ever saw was government buildings, hospitals, jails (yes I've been in jail) love to tell that one lol, and schools.
Concrete multi story apartments where the plastic plumbing starts to leak after a decade, very common, try to fix that! Try to retrofit plumbing in a 30 story building. Foundations that subside, not common but... Even one or two where the concrete support pillars were cracking under load. And commercial is the bright spot, move into the housing industry, homes and the 2-story units and it's a quality disaster. A grubby little builder told me once that it doesn't matter if the homes fall apart in 30 years because by then owners will want a newer home anyway, it's the land that has value he says, the building is nothing.
That's common thinking, that's modern thinking, "new is better" thinking. What I think is that the residential housing/land bubble will burst one day as people realize they can't afford to heat their homes, afford the drive to work, or the government gives up trying to maintain the endless roads and water mains and sewage systems. It was all built with Oil of course, maintained with oil. When the oil goes so does suburbia, I believe that wholeheartedly. But in the meantime there is money to be made...
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.