Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

IATA's eternal optimism

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

IATA's eternal optimism

Unread postby Karl » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 15:01:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')ATA halved its loss forecast for 2006 to $2.2 billion from a previous forecast of $4.3 billion and now expects the world's airlines to earn $7.2 billion in 2007, increased from earlier estimates of a $6 billion profit next year. The improvement is being driven by events in North America and particularly the US, where a 3% reduction in domestic capacity coupled with strong traffic is producing double-digit unit revenue growth.

IATA now expects US carriers to lose $5.4 billion this year, down from $10.4 billion in 2005. "Restructuring in the US industry has produced some impressive results, including a 34% increase in productivity," DG and CEO Giovanni Bisignani stated. Nonetheless, he said that at 33% of operating costs, "US labor costs are higher than their competitors in both Europe and Asia." Asia/Pacific carriers are forecast to earn $2 billion this year, reduced from $2.9 billion last year, while European airlines will see profitability decrease to $1.4 billion from $1.8 billion. The revised forecasts are based on crude oil prices of $57 per barrel (Brent) in 2006 and $52 in 2007


[url=http://atwonline.com/news/other.html?issueDate=3%2F24%2F2006]
Atwonline[/url]

Now the first quarter has closed can anyone privide the average prices so far for Nymex crude and Brent IPE?
User avatar
Karl
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: IATA's eternal optimism

Unread postby Andy » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 15:23:01

The aviation industry, of all the industries has their head buried deepest in the sand regarding fuel availability. That is really ironic given that they are the most exposed industry to liquid fuels crises. All the surface transport modes have feasible alternative fuels, possibly even electricity.

They really think that the present growth rate can continue for more than another 4 to 5 years? We will see who is right I guess. It should be interesting.
For ionizing radiation “…the human epidemiological evidence establishes—by any reasonable standard of proof—that there is no safe dose or dose-rate…the safe-dose hypothesis is not merely implausible—it is disproven.” Dr. J.W. Gofman 4
User avatar
Andy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun 16 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: IATA's eternal optimism

Unread postby pigleg » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 21:53:13

Apparently at below supersonic speeds the propeller has an efficiency advantage (up to 30%) over the jet engine - so no doubt we'll see more turboprops. I didn't realize that turboprop was actually a jet engine with a propeller, I thought it was a piston engine. Also found Propfan which was a reaction to the last energy crisis, but was discontinued when oil prices fell again. Maybe that'll come back too.
User avatar
pigleg
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: IATA's eternal optimism

Unread postby SoothSayer » Sun 02 Apr 2006, 13:03:13

I wonder if the UK still has the plans for this ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Britannia

.... it could be the start of a whole new (?) industry!

[I flew from Hong Kong to the UK on one as a child]

edit: sp
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron