Shaved, I watched your video on Emilia Hazelip. Great garden, no doubt. Ruth Stout style on steroids. She said it was a bit over an acre, about the size of our tomato field. Mostly standard straight beds with the exception of the spiral, which will make things far more difficult to manage than necessary, but it looks nice (if looks are what you're after).

Large initial labor input shaping the raised beds, that must have been back breaking to do by hand (easily done with a tractor, though; see my avatar). Looks to me like a significant amount of labor at every step of the process, from set up to maintenance, despite the linkage with Fukuoka's “do nothing” school. Such is the reality of growing food. The speed at which they were working is definitely home gardener, that level of labor productivity wouldn't fly on commercial farms. The low level of labor productivity is exacerbated by the mulch system.
Where I'm confused is why this is considered “permaculture.” She's planting annual crops for the most part, beans, potatoes, chard, tomatoes, etc., same stuff we grow. Her mulching system requires the importation of large quantities of mulch on a regular basis. Looks like straw for the most part. Straw production is done with tractors, multiple rounds of plowing, disking, harrowing, seeding, fertilizing/compost spreading, spraying, mowing, raking, baling, etc. And any idea how many hours spreading all this straw on an acre by hand would require? Many. The little kids in her video won't be doing it.
I'm also confused why this type of soil management is inherently superior to our use of manure, lime, cover crops, crop rotation, etc. Her explanations were rather mystical (“indigestion” from “force feeding soil” and such).
It mostly comes down to tillage, and I know, I know, tillage is the devil to permies. Yet soil actually improves with organic methods involving tillage, despite permie claims to the contrary. Weird.
A garden will make your rations go further.