by KaiserJeep » Sat 12 Nov 2016, 17:47:30
The local MN website:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The over 600 who were killed compares with 615 battlefield deaths of Minnesota Civil War soldiers. Most of the over 600 who were killed in Minnesota were unarmed non-combatants and most were killed within a 6-week period, whereas those in the Civil War were spread out over a 4-year period. There may have been a little over 100 Dakota who were killed, with very few or possibly no women and children. In contrast, over 100 white women and over 70 white children who were 10 or under were killed.
When looking at a daily toll of victims, there were over 200 killed on August 18, 1862 whereas there were about 235 soldiers killed with General George Custer at the Battle of the Little Big Horn on June 25, 1876. There were only up to six Dakota who were killed on August 18, 1862 in Minnesota. It was a massacre, with the Dakota targeting men, women and children.
http://www.dakotavictims1862.com/Family_and_Friends_of_Dakota_Uprising/Causes,_Significance_%26_Facts.htmlI'm not saying that there were not reasons that the Dakota Sioux went to war, but nobody denies they were the aggressors or that the deaths were skewed all on the side of the white settlers.
This is the largest US Indian war with the most casualties. The second largest is the combined Cheyenne and Lakota Sioux conflict at Little Bighorn, where US General Custer bought it.
Both conflicts are probably dwarfed by the Huron Wars, aka the French and Indian Wars, but casualty numbers there are uncertain, and those conflicts were mainly in Canada.
The primary cause of the Sioux uprisings was the fact that the Sioux were attempting to transition from hunter/gatherer nomadic tribes to stationary agriculture, after the fur-bearing animal species were decimated - by firearm-bearing Sioux, in the period 1840-1860. The Indian Agents failed to both teach agriculture and to distribute interim foodstuffs, and the Winter was a harsh one.
Understand, the Indians never had a chance. They were individual tribes, not a nation. The white settlers were more numerous and were a nation with an army. But if anything won the Indian Wars, it was European microbes and European diseases. Compared to disease casualties, all of the Indian wars collectively are very minor.