Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Here's your mass extinction for ya

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:35:34

What exactly has the EPA done that is supposed to be saving us from "mass extinction"?

1. The EPA raised the level of corn ethanol in gasoline to 15%.

2. The EPA doesn't require permits for CO2 emissions from corn ethanol plants.

The EPA claims this is good, because corn ethanol is "carbon neutral." But studies by scientists show that corn ethanol production is NOT carbon neutral---it actually uses more gas and releases MORE CO2 then the amount of gasoline it replaces. AND, distilling corn into ethanol diverts corn from food into fuel production, resulting in higher food prices.

While the EPA's support for corn ethanol is good for Archer Daniels Midland and other Agribusiness giants, most scientists believe it does nothing to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere-----in fact, it results in MORE CO2 in the atmosphere then you'd get just from buring oil. This means the EPAs policies are making Greenhouse Warming WORSE.
Image
Last edited by Plantagenet on Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:39:31, edited 1 time in total.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:36:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')On that I disagree. I do feel strongly that there is no hope of turning us from our apparent course.


I don't see it in such a win/lose binary proposition. Yes, we've already "lost" by many metrics. But I think there is a difference in the final outcome if we have a functional EPA or if everybody with a brain stops voting and neocons turn the country into some sort of Handmaid's Tale state. You know what I mean? We're forced to participate at some bare minimum as citizens within BAU, and that means picking sides, the lesser of two evils. Or support a third party as well, but not to just tune out, walk away, and hand the country over to idiocracy.
mos6507
 

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:38:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '[')b]the EPAs policies are making Greenhouse Warming WORSE.


Three words for you that forever invalidates your credibility when judging environmental policy:

DRILL BABY DRILL

You will again be able to make credible arguments about environmental policy if you rebuke Palin, but since you never will, you'll never be taken seriously, since nobody who supports her can ever realistically claim to give a crap about the environment.
mos6507
 

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:44:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'i')f we have a functional EPA ...


You don't get it. The EPA's policies aren't stopping Greenhouse warming. The EPA is making Greenhouse Warming worse then it would be if we just burned gasoline.

The EPA is trying to boost corn ethanol production, but scientific studies show more CO2 is released by growing, refining, blending and burning corn ethanol then would be released otherwise. :roll:
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 22 Jan 2011, 19:52:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', ' ')Palin...


Gosh, Mos. Are you back on Sarah Palin again? :roll: Your nutty obsession with Sarah Palin is silly. She's isn't in office and isn't making policy.

Why not discuss the issues----the stupid current EPA policy of promoting corn ethanol is entirely the fault of the Obama administration---they are the ones who are accelerating Greenhouse Warming by pushing corn ethanol use.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 00:31:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')On that I disagree. I do feel strongly that there is no hope of turning us from our apparent course.


I don't see it in such a win/lose binary proposition. Yes, we've already "lost" by many metrics. But I think there is a difference in the final outcome if we have a functional EPA or if everybody with a brain stops voting and neocons turn the country into some sort of Handmaid's Tale state. You know what I mean? We're forced to participate at some bare minimum as citizens within BAU, and that means picking sides, the lesser of two evils. Or support a third party as well, but not to just tune out, walk away, and hand the country over to idiocracy.


Maybe it's a generational thing, differing baselines and all that. I've been hearing about how we need to take the parties back for over 40 years. I remember the Democratic Convention in Chicago when I thought something would really come out of all the noise. Yet nothing did come out of it. MY generation took over and made a worse mess than THEIR generation.

And now? No riots, few demonstrations. The Million Man March? Perhaps that is what McKibben is calling for, mass riots in the streets by seniors. But by comparison we are all blue pillers of society.

I applaud your fervor, but question the efficacy of your efforts. Personally, I'd quietly build my stash. Good luck with either course.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 00:33:41

I'm sorry for this but............

I've got this image of 10,000 grannies ripping their bras off and using them to fire to the EPA headquarters!

Good God, what an vision. If that doesn't put fear into the hearts of the administration I don't know what would.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 00:47:58

Just wait until social security bottoms out. Then we'll see the seniors take to the streets. We live in interesting times. Maybe if the GIs coming back from WWII had kept it in their pants we'd have been better off. Whatever happened to the poster who kept blaming everything on "baby boomers"?
mos6507
 

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 10:55:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'J')ust wait until social security bottoms out. Then we'll see the seniors take to the streets. We live in interesting times. Maybe if the GIs coming back from WWII had kept it in their pants we'd have been better off. Whatever happened to the poster who kept blaming everything on "baby boomers"?


Read about the Bonus Army. It may give a different perspective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he self-named Bonus Expeditionary Force was an assemblage of some 43,000 marchers—17,000 World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups—who protested in Washington, D.C., in the spring and summer of 1932. Called the Bonus March by the news media, the Bonus Marchers were more popularly known as the Bonus Army. It was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The veterans were encouraged in their demand for immediate cash-payment redemption of their service certificates by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, one of the most popular military figures of the time.

Many of the war veterans had been out of work since the beginning of the Great Depression. The World War Adjusted Compensation Act of 1924 had awarded them bonuses in the form of certificates they could not redeem until 1945. Each Service Certificate, issued to a qualified veteran soldier, bore a face value equal to the soldier's promised payment plus compound interest. The principal demand of the Bonus Army was the immediate cash payment of their Certificates.

On July 28, U.S. Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered the veterans removed from all government property. Washington police met with resistance, shots were fired and two veterans were killed. President Herbert Hoover then ordered the army to clear the veterans' campsite. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur commanded the infantry and cavalry supported by six tanks. The Bonus Army marchers with their wives and children were driven out, and their shelters and belongings burned. Two more of the veterans died.[citation needed]

A second, smaller Bonus March in 1933 at the start of the Roosevelt Administration was defused with promises instead of military action.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Pretorian » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 11:00:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'W')hat exactly has the EPA done that is supposed to be saving us from "mass extinction"?

1. The EPA raised the level of corn ethanol in gasoline to 15%.

2. The EPA doesn't require permits for CO2 emissions from corn ethanol plants.

The EPA claims this is good, because corn ethanol is "carbon neutral." But studies by scientists show that corn ethanol production is NOT carbon neutral---it actually uses more gas and releases MORE CO2 then the amount of gasoline it replaces. AND, distilling corn into ethanol diverts corn from food into fuel production, resulting in higher food prices.

While the EPA's support for corn ethanol is good for Archer Daniels Midland and other Agribusiness giants, most scientists believe it does nothing to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere-----in fact, it results in MORE CO2 in the atmosphere then you'd get just from buring oil. This means the EPAs policies are making Greenhouse Warming WORSE.
Image


But thats silly-- corn has to catch CO2 from the air before it can release it.

As for higher food prices, that is more enviromentally protective than anything else so far . AND it helps USA economically.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 12:41:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'S')he's isn't in office and isn't making policy.


But if you had your way, she would have. Oh, and McCain "bomb, bomb Iran, let's say in Iraq for 100 years". What are the chances that you'd be digging into Palin for the BP oil spill or McCain for us still being in Iraq or Afghanistan had that dynamic duo won the whitehouse? I DIDN'T THINK SO. You don't care about the issues. You cry crocodile tears over these issues. You care only about making Obama look bad according to criteria you aren't even passionate about, just because you've gut a bug up your ass about him (probably because of the Rev. Wright scandal). And you're too egotistical to admit it.

And guess what, everybody on this forum gets your modus operandi already. When I was just lurking here, I sometimes noticed others reply to you the way I am now, so don't make it seem like it's just me reacting this way. Shorty's been kicked off the forums again, finally, for not participating here in good faith and if there is any sanity left, you'll get bumped next, since you rarely if ever engage in these issues. It's all ulterior motive for you. All Obama all the time.

At least some of the other posters like Mattduke who have a thing against the administration seem to actually have a consistent anti-establishment ideology, but not you. With you it's just Obama the individual. It's a petty vendetta.

Do you want me to go back and compile a statistical report on your posts, Planty? It would show that 90% or more of your posts following the Rev. Wright scandal follow the same stale pattern of building some Fox-News-Like jab against Obama culminating in some stupid political cartoon. Even for people who don't like Obama, it's too much. You're a one-dimensional poster, Planty.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 23 Jan 2011, 14:14:02

The EPA's support for corn ethanol is INCREASING the amount of CO2 being released in the USA.

Cars using ethanol release about 30% less CO2....but they are 30% less powerful, so they have to use more fuel. AND the production of ethanol uses more oil for fertilizers, agricultural planting and harvesting. And still more oil during refining, transport, and mixing.

The net result is that the EPA is causing Greenhouse warming...not stopping it.

Here is a post from The Oil Drum explaining this... .The EPA is making Greenhouse Warming worse by mandating corn ethanol
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 02:11:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he EPA's support for corn ethanol is INCREASING the amount of CO2 being released in the USA.

Cars using ethanol release about 30% less CO2....but they are 30% less powerful, so they have to use more fuel. AND the production of ethanol uses more oil for fertilizers, agricultural planting and harvesting. And still more oil during refining, transport, and mixing.

The net result is that the EPA is causing Greenhouse warming...not stopping it.

Here is a post from The Oil Drum explaining this... .The EPA is making Greenhouse Warming worse by mandating corn ethanol


In other news, cucumbers kills you dead. They cause 100% mortallity. Everyone, every last person who had ever eaten cucumbers, is dead or in a process of dying.
Anyway, back to our horses: there is not much about CO2 in that post at all. Furthermore, it is not possible to sustain your claim whatsoever simply because its not possible to calculate how many people gave up on having (insert a number here ) kid because of a higher food prices, or how many
people got covered with a bit of dirt as a result of ethanol making.
I can tell you with 100% guarantie that if we convert 100% of our food to ethanol the reduction of greenhouse gases emissions will be 100%.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 02:59:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'A')nd guess what, everybody on this forum gets your modus operandi already. When I was just lurking here, I sometimes noticed others reply to you the way I am now, so don't make it seem like it's just me reacting this way. Shorty's been kicked off the forums again, finally, for not participating here in good faith and if there is any sanity left, you'll get bumped next, since you rarely if ever engage in these issues. It's all ulterior motive for you. All Obama all the time.


EDIT -- post deleted, rephrasing to be more diplomatic:

Would be nice if Plant would post less Obama stuff, but in this case it was pertinent info. Would be nice though if he'd write more on other topics.

Lastly, Plant's been on the forum for a long time I personally wouldn't want to see him banned.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 03:32:30

Neither Dems nor Republicans will do anything about climate change, and its probably too late to prevent it.

Stupid kudzu apes might as well be stumbling around the magazine room on a ship striking matches.

The best you can hope for to stop climate change would be Yellowstone caldera erupting and putting and end to the industrial age and most farming.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 03:40:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')On that I disagree. I do feel strongly that there is no hope of turning us from our apparent course.


I don't see it in such a win/lose binary proposition. Yes, we've already "lost" by many metrics. But I think there is a difference in the final outcome if we have a functional EPA or if everybody with a brain stops voting and neocons turn the country into some sort of Handmaid's Tale state. You know what I mean? We're forced to participate at some bare minimum as citizens within BAU, and that means picking sides, the lesser of two evils. Or support a third party as well, but not to just tune out, walk away, and hand the country over to idiocracy.

What does it matter if everyone with a brain stops voting? Money tends to win anyway, since it can control the MSM.

The Rex Tillerson's of the world have more sway than the Steven Hawking's of the world.

Its not the age of choices now, its the age of consequences. A few people, like John Lovelock are aware of this. You need to figure out now how you are to survive the future.

I hope we can get some isolationist Republicans in power, then maybe BAU can continue long enough for my preps to be finished.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Mesuge » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 08:43:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', ' ')I hope we can get some isolationist Republicans in power, then maybe BAU can continue long enough for my preps to be finished.


Very true, as mentioned few pages back and in other threads, leaders/ticket based on people like Trump/Bloomberg, could buy us preppers some more time.
Most likely via combination of erecting tariffs, cutting some of the mil-industrial pork etc. I don't like these guys one bit, but frankly they are actual real do-ers in the material world, as opposed to plutocractic talking clowns (craddle to grave) like Obama and Pelosi types.

We all know, that in any case, the end game for PO aftermath is lunatic populist in office ala pres. Greg Stillson in Dead Zone (1983) with launch codes and I'd rather get to that point a bit later than sooner..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 14:37:53

Mos,

I agree with your original post. I also tend to agree with others here who point to the fact that at this point it probably doesn't matter who or what party you back. They are all criminally inept. Except for a very few members of each party the dissonance, the arrogance, the ignorance on climate and energy issues is so thick you could cut it with a knife. Without knowledge and understanding of our current predicament no enlightenment will occur. BAU will be FOUGHT FOR until it can't be.

I'm a believer that the path has been set, we lost any real shot at solving any of this about 20-25 years ago. The real place to look for any sort of "help' is your local community and neighborhood. Grass roots is going to be the only way to start something that can take hold. Unfortunately in our dumbed down soundbite, clown car internet world, there is ALWAYS a way to find what one thinks is credible information to support one's world view. By that I mean that the majority of folks are in denial about all this and spurring action is difficult at best and nearly insurmountable at worst.

I believe that nothing substantial will change and the only real catalyst will be near catastrophic social unrest and economic dislocation on a grand scale. We are not the humans we were 30-40 or 100 years ago. We have become lazy, fat, and stupid. We all know what it means here. We more than most understand the implications. Peddling that to someone who has completely embraced the happy motoring consumptive lifestyle will be nearly impossible until it smacks them upside the head.

Good luck changing that paradigm...thats why I have and always will be a slow crash doomer.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Nefarious » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 15:01:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y that I mean that the majority of folks are in denial about all this and spurring action is difficult at best and nearly insurmountable at worst.


TRENDING NOW
1.Flavor Flav
2.Nicki Minaj
3.Talia Balsam
4.Lung cancer
5.Food delivery service
6.McRib
7.Obesity and sleep
8.Black and Yellow
9.RuPaul
10.Moscow explosion

Well at least some news made it to the number 10 spot. :lol:
.
'By the pricking of my thumbs,Something Wicked This Way Comes."
User avatar
Nefarious
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri 31 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Location: The Deep South
Top

Re: Here's your mass extinction for ya

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 24 Jan 2011, 16:27:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nefarious', '
')5.Food delivery service
6.McRib
7.Obesity and sleep


Well those three sure go together.

I don't think I've had a McRib in 20 years..

Image
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron