by shortonsense » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 15:21:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', '
')The paradox is, that in arguing that PO is not going to significantly effect our lives, they justify a no-change approach that will actually take us over a higher and steeper drop.
It strikes me that change is already happening, ranging from fewer cars being built, a good thing, people using less fuel which keeps leading to higher inventories of everything from fuel for home heating to gasoline
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12400801/ns ... nd_energy/new electrical generation coming from wind, a decent recession teaching people something hopefully they will remember as long as I have the ones in the 70's and early 80's, along with the attendant lessons of living close to work, don't buy SUV's and F150's just for fun because someday, save some cash, don't fall for snake oil mortgages, it might hurt, etc etc.
Heck, its transition central as best I can tell. Next up is alternative trnsport, that might require another peak oil or peak price shock, but its obviously next up in the batters box. And its the game changer as well, efficiency from hybrids is nice, but EV's and PHEV's can go cold turkey on crude, which is what most commuting Americans actually need.