by vtsnowedin » Wed 12 Jun 2013, 02:35:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '(')Yes Davep, the new guy tends to drift off topic, but in this case a discussion on gun violence would seem to be relevant. Anyway he is also wrong, so I feel compelled to respond.)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newbie Wants Info', 'T')hat's why the vast majority of shooting victims are unarmed.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wiki', 'B')etween 1990 and 1994, 75% of all homicide victims age 21 and younger in the city of Boston had a prior criminal record.[45] In Philadelphia, the percentage of those killed in gun homicides that had prior criminal records increased from 73% in 1985 to 93% in 1996.[16][46] In Richmond, Virginia, the risk of gunshot injury is 22 times higher for those males involved with crime.[47]
In 2005, 75% of the 10,100 homicides committed using firearms in the United States were committed using handguns, compared to 4% with rifles, 5% with shotguns, and the rest with unspecified firearms.[48]
The likelihood that a death will result is significantly increased when either the victim or the attacker has a firearm.[49] For example, the mortality rate for gunshot wounds to the heart is 84%, compared to 30% for people who sustain stab wounds to the heart.[50]