Peak Oil
Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Followup Guardian Article

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.
Post a reply

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby JustaGirl » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 21:35:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'V') and OF - play with each other instead of yourselves for a nice change.


You just summed up nicely why this board is a disgrace, and why no one will ever take you seriously.
Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible.
JustaGirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed 09 Apr 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Petoria
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 21:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dr. Ofellati', 'V') and OF - play with each other instead of yourselves for a nice change. 8)


:lol:

And this is the best witticism the good doctor can come up with? Too fun! I have a counter that would put your half-hearted effort to shame (and plays beautifully on your name, btw), 'cept that to post it would likely get my post edited and me banned, so I'll behave...but I can PM it to anybody who's curious. ;)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou just summed up nicely why this board is a disgrace, and why no one will ever take you seriously.


Don't be too hard on them, my dear...when your "Prophets" have the sorts of batting averages their home team has, it frankly doesn't leave them much to work with...that's why it's so important to excommunicate anybody who questions the faithful, or the "party line."

-=Vel=-
Out of curiosity:

Who were you before you were Dr. Fellatio? What prediction did you have to run and hide from that prompted the sudden name change? ;) (I ask because I begin to think Ludi must be right in her theory about your "life" here before your current incarnation).
Last edited by Velociryx on Sun 15 Nov 2009, 21:52:03, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 21:50:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustaGirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'V') and OF - play with each other instead of yourselves for a nice change.


You just summed up nicely why this board is a disgrace, and why no one will ever take you seriously.
You sound angry. Why do you even care if this board is a disgrace? Or that it be taken seriously?


I don't know the lass, but honestly, I doubt she does care (nor is she angry). Most probably, she's here for the entertainment value, like me. ;)

-=Vel=-
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Dr. Ofellati » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:04:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Velociryx', '-')--


Cornutroll disregarded.
Dr. O
The Mos theorem - Those who do not reach my conclusions after having reviewed the evidence are either deniers, if they reject my conclusion, or conspiracy theorists, if I reject theirs.
User avatar
Dr. Ofellati
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:26:37
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Dr. Ofellati » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:06:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustaGirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'V') and OF - play with each other instead of yourselves for a nice change.


You just summed up nicely why this board is a disgrace, and why no one will ever take you seriously.


1. Why are you participating in the disgrace?
2. Don't confuse "JustaGirl" not taking me seriously with "no one."
3. I couldn't care less whether I'm taken seriously.
Dr. O
The Mos theorem - Those who do not reach my conclusions after having reviewed the evidence are either deniers, if they reject my conclusion, or conspiracy theorists, if I reject theirs.
User avatar
Dr. Ofellati
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:26:37
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Dr. Ofellati » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:08:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dr. Ofellati', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Velociryx', '-')--


Cornutroll disregarded.
That's good. Cornutrollian?


Not bad - good build.

I'm just done with the following - velociyx, of, maddog, the sense person, and so on. They are hereinafter disregarded. Those who wish to see will see, nothwithstanding their attempts to water down this site with their white noise.
Dr. O
The Mos theorem - Those who do not reach my conclusions after having reviewed the evidence are either deniers, if they reject my conclusion, or conspiracy theorists, if I reject theirs.
User avatar
Dr. Ofellati
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:26:37
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:13:40

:shock:

OH NOES!!!!

I am being ignored by DOCTOR Fellatio!

*sniff, sob*...I....I'm not sure if my....fragile ego can take it.... :(

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m just done with the following - velociyx, of, maddog, the sense person, and so on. They are hereinafter disregarded. Those who wish to see will see, nothwithstanding their attempts to water down this site with their white noise.


Translation: LALALALALALALA! I'm not going to listen to ANY comment made by any person whose views do not fit neatly into the framework of my preconceived notions of where the world is heading. I'd rather just take my ball and go home than confront the reality that I may have it wrong...I mean...me?! I'm a Doctor for goodness sake...of course I"m right!

-=Vel=-

You have a nice evening, doc. ;)
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby thuja » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:15:57

I am still wondering how long it will be before the IEA (and EIA and CERA) revise their production graphs to show the real truth- that we are at peak...now.

How long do you think it will take Vel?
No Soup for You!!
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:19:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'I') am still wondering how long it will be before the IEA (and EIA and CERA) revise their production graphs to show the real truth- that we are at peak...now.

How long do you think it will take Vel?


I'm on record as saying that I think we should wait ~20 years before we can say with any authority that we ARE at peak (so I think TOD called it WAY early). But...they have, and I'll play along cos it gives me LOTS of fodder.

But I'd not be surprised if any of the major tracking organizations wants a good number of years of data under their belt before calling it definitively, and based on past "peaks," this is probably wise.

-=Vel=-
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby thuja » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:26:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Velociryx', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'I') am still wondering how long it will be before the IEA (and EIA and CERA) revise their production graphs to show the real truth- that we are at peak...now.

How long do you think it will take Vel?


I'm on record as saying that I think we should wait ~20 years before we can say with any authority that we ARE at peak (so I think TOD called it WAY early). But...they have, and I'll play along cos it gives me LOTS of fodder.

But I'd not be surprised if any of the major tracking organizations wants a good number of years of data under their belt before calling it definitively, and based on past "peaks," this is probably wise.

-=Vel=-


Well you can say we can wait 20 years- but trust me no one else thinks that- not even the most cornucopian CERA. If they came out and all said we hit have hit peak and will be experiencing ongoing production depletion here on out...?

They would cause a dramatic change in oil pricing via the
market, and would radically affect governmental poilicy throughout the world.

But still the questuion remains...when will they finally capitulate and agree that peak oil has just passed...or at least is imminent?
Last edited by thuja on Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:32:42, edited 1 time in total.
No Soup for You!!
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:35:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Velociryx', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'I') am still wondering how long it will be before the IEA (and EIA and CERA) revise their production graphs to show the real truth- that we are at peak...now.

How long do you think it will take Vel?


I'm on record as saying that I think we should wait ~20 years before we can say with any authority that we ARE at peak (so I think TOD called it WAY early). But...they have, and I'll play along cos it gives me LOTS of fodder.

But I'd not be surprised if any of the major tracking organizations wants a good number of years of data under their belt before calling it definitively, and based on past "peaks," this is probably wise.

-=Vel=-


Well you can say we can wait 20 years- but trust me no one else thinks that- not even the most cornucopian CERA. If they came out and all said we hit have hit peak and will be experiencing ongoing production depletion here on out...?

They would cause a radical shift a radical change in oil pricing via the
market, and would radically affect governmental poilicy throughout the world.

But still the questuion remains...when will they finally capitulate and agree that peak oil has just passed...or at least is imminent?


Well, from looking at the charts on world oil production, we had a single dip that lasted from ~'70 - ~'83, so five years.

How much egg do you suppose the folks who "called it" 3 months into the slope had? Or six? Or even two years?

So no...I think anybody with any sense is going to give it AT LEAST five years (the length of the last major downward slope of the "peak") before they call it, with confidence increasing the longer they wait.

Sure, you might get lucky by calling it early. Or...you might make the latest in a VERY long line of bogus predictions.

-=Vel=-
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Dr. Ofellati » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:36:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Velociryx', '-')--

Cornutroll - disregarded.
Dr. O
The Mos theorem - Those who do not reach my conclusions after having reviewed the evidence are either deniers, if they reject my conclusion, or conspiracy theorists, if I reject theirs.
User avatar
Dr. Ofellati
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:26:37
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 22:38:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou are making the same ignorant argument that your little troll brother (may he rest in peace. I sent him back to his culvert) farts out on a regular basis. Yes, there have been multiple peaks. But that is because IEA, AEB, BP, etc. all play games with production numbers (to confuse dimwits like yourself. Consider yourself one of the tricked :lol: ). So one (EIA) include liquids that count at best, as double-dipped. It takes as much petroleum energy to produce ethanol as exists in the final product. Others of these Bush-era corporate petroleum-whoring Republican mouthpieces also treat Turkey Guts and Saturian Methane as "reserves" Pathetic that you buy this crap.


Pathetic that you're still here, even tho you DO buy into the doomer paradise package. Again sir...peak + 1 year...what are you still doing online? STOP eating cheetos in your undies and sitting in a dark room staring at your computer monitor. Go...prep the doomstead, buy some extra ammo and can something. For goodness sake, don't waste your few remaining peaceful days chattering away on some internet forum...

-=Vel=-

I mean DUDE...if the end really is nigh...what a waste of time...

....which goes doubly for you, doc. I mean, good lord...if I ACTUALLY believed what you guys believe, I sure as $hit wouldn't waste precious seconds typing "cornutroll disregarded" (or anything else, for that matter)! I'd be out preparing, or enjoying the last days before the zombie hordes, etc.
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Followup Guardian Article

Unread postby Velociryx » Sun 15 Nov 2009, 23:02:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ame old sh@t. Everyone who does not agree with you is necessarily a "doomer". or a "peaker" Where do you get this nonsense!. Oh. I know. It's from Shorty. And yes I do have guns. Even a garden. So what?

But you have not responded to my point. The crux of your idiocy and that repeated endlessly by senseless is this in big bold letters: MULTIPLE PEAKS ARE A DIVERSION, function of differing definitions.

god. what numskull


Indeed, it truly is the same old, same old...and yes, based on our previous encounters, you ARE a doomer, and you DO believe in a fairly fast crash scenario, no fix possible at this late date, mass die-offs, etc. Based on my understanding of the parameters of those who self-define as "doomers" (and if I felt up to it, I am sure I could scour all your posts and find at least one where you describe yourself using that very word...now scurry off and edit them, quick@!), the term fits you pretty well--certainly well to the right of Thuja's moderate position.

And as I've said before, 99.9999% of the population will accept the mathematical notion of peak (making all of us "peakers" in that sense) provided you don't try to foist your disaster scenarios on them).

And no, multiple peaks are not a diversion. Tell it to the people who called PO back in the 70's (and were later proved wrong) - also known as "the faithful," or "your bretheren."

As to responding to your "point," I didn't respond because you've yet to make one. As soon as you do, however, I'll be more than happy to oblige.

Finally, as to where I get this nonsense...most of it from right here. PeakOil.com...my favorite source for nonsense of the doomerish variety, and so far, you've yet to disappoint. ;)

'nite!

-=Vel=-

and yes, while "numbskull" DOES describe you somewhat adequately, it just doesn't QUITE get the job done...I mean, it lacks a certain ambiance that encompasses the true depth of your particular mental condition.
User avatar
Velociryx
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests