Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy and the Mother of Invention

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby Doly » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 04:13:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', '
')What? ya think we were just collectively retarded and squishy headed before the 19th and 20th centuries?
Of course not - few had time to really think.


I don't think that time to think was the major issue. After all, nowadays people are often so stressed with their jobs that they mostly avoid thinking out of work time. I think the reason has more to do with factors like:

1) Greater population. The more people, the more clever people.
2) Access to research tools (such as microscopes, precision instruments). There is a limited number of things you can do with your hands and eyes.
3) Widespread education.
4) Research being recognized as a useful goal in itself.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 10:20:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', '
')Dude - we/they can make a small piece of junk spin indefinately on a table top = fusion.

I blame hollywood, the sci fi genre in general and more specifically spiderman2 the movie ;-)


Yeah, that was the second most rediculous sci-fi concept I've seen. The worst is of course faster than light travel.. I understand that its a requirement for the show to work as dramatic entertainment, but I still find it very difficult to suspend belief when someone makes a working fusion reactor i a small building, or travels from star to star in 5 seconds flat.

There is a reason I use the term hollywierd!!

On the other hand, there are no physical laws in play that exclude the possibilitiy of fusion power generation, so it can't be dismissed out of hand simply because sci-fi movie makers have used it as a prop. I don't think the odds of success are very high, especially not in this reduced time frame, but it does seem to be the end-game wager that is already on the table.

The real question is alluded to in the original post, do the lights stay on long enough for this technology to make it from a "just maybe it'll work" to powering the grid in fifty years?
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 15:29:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')Correct me if I misread the original post... the topic as I understand it was invention requiring excess energy.

My argument is that the inventions we need are likely at least decades away, but are within the realm of possibility.


No, bringing invention to fruition makes a new demand on energy.

Decades? The inventions we need to bring to fruition now are wind, solar, and other renewables. Mass transit systems, mega expansion of the electrical grid and electrical power generation. These will require enormous amounts of new energy consumption to design, manufacture and deliver.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 16:31:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '
')My argument is that the inventions we need are likely at least decades away, but are within the realm of possibility.


No, bringing invention to fruition makes a new demand on energy.


Yes, it does make new demands on energy, which is why it is important for the price of oil to steadily climb in order to surpress stupid-uses demands. Only those demands which provide a rather massive energy payoff, such as building a nuclear power station, should be economically viable.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Decades? The inventions we need to bring to fruition now are wind, solar, and other renewables. Mass transit systems, mega expansion of the electrical grid and electrical power generation. These will require enormous amounts of new energy consumption to design, manufacture and deliver.


While it should be noted that I have absolutely nothing against building jillions of wind turbines and solar panels, and even providing hefty tax rebates for folks installing solar panels at home, I don't think we come anywhere near close to our electrical needs with renewables. The grid is certainly a problem, but I think the companies involved will be able to keep manage.

However, the idea that we are going to deploy even the small amount of renewable tech that we are capable of producing just doesn't seem realisitic. I'd bet on practical fusion before I'd bet on mass deployment of renewables; and I don't have much confidence that practical fusion is likely eveb within the next hundred years.

So, my opinion on this is that the inventions that we really need in order to meet the demands of peak oil are legislative, not technical. We need massive regulatory relief and liability protection, and we need laws that make NIMBY's pay for the inconveniences they place on the rest of the system. Safety to the point of starvation is not a good plan in my book.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 17:17:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')Yes, it does make new demands on energy, which is why it is important for the price of oil to steadily climb in order to surpress stupid-uses demands. Only those demands which provide a rather massive energy payoff, such as building a nuclear power station, should be economically viable.


GDP cares not whether the use is stupid or not. So, everyone who has a stupid use job or priduct goes pound sand while we use their "freed-up" energy to build nukes?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')We need massive regulatory relief and liability protection, and we need laws that make NIMBY's pay for the inconveniences they place on the rest of the system. Safety to the point of starvation is not a good plan in my book.


Safety to the point of sustainability is though, isn't it?

You still need new energy to build nukes.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 17:43:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')Yes, it does make new demands on energy, which is why it is important for the price of oil to steadily climb in order to surpress stupid-uses demands. Only those demands which provide a rather massive energy payoff, such as building a nuclear power station, should be economically viable.


GDP cares not whether the use is stupid or not. So, everyone who has a stupid use job or priduct goes pound sand while we use their "freed-up" energy to build nukes?


Nah, they can go find something productive to do with their time. Something that doesn't simply leach off of cheap oil.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e need massive regulatory relief and liability protection, and we need laws that make NIMBY's pay for the inconveniences they place on the rest of the system. Safety to the point of starvation is not a good plan in my book.


Safety to the point of sustainability is though, isn't it?


Only if its possible while maintaining at least 2000 kwh/mon/family in the US.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You still need new energy to build nukes.

Yes, but you get that energy by taking it from people who aren't truly productive, and you take it from them with massive hikes in the price of oil. Those jobs which can't be sustained at the $100/bbl and $200/bbl price points need to be terminated, badly. If they can't find a job, they can go do something like manicure lawns with reel mowers, hoes and rakes; drug around by hand in a big red wagon. Nothing but sweat input, all dollars out are income.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby ubercrap » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 12:34:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')Yes, it does make new demands on energy, which is why it is important for the price of oil to steadily climb in order to surpress stupid-uses demands. Only those demands which provide a rather massive energy payoff, such as building a nuclear power station, should be economically viable.


GDP cares not whether the use is stupid or not. So, everyone who has a stupid use job or priduct goes pound sand while we use their "freed-up" energy to build nukes?


Nah, they can go find something productive to do with their time. Something that doesn't simply leach off of cheap oil.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou still need new energy to build nukes.


Yes, but you get that energy by taking it from people who aren't truly productive, and you take it from them with massive hikes in the price of oil. Those jobs which can't be sustained at the $100/bbl and $200/bbl price points need to be terminated, badly. If they can't find a job, they can go do something like manicure lawns with reel mowers, hoes and rakes; drug around by hand in a big red wagon. Nothing but sweat input, all dollars out are income.


They? How do you know you shouldn't be saying I?
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby MonteQuest » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 13:55:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')
Nah, they can go find something productive to do with their time. Something that doesn't simply leach off of cheap oil.

Yes, but you get that energy by taking it from people who aren't truly productive, and you take it from them with massive hikes in the price of oil. Those jobs which can't be sustained at the $100/bbl and $200/bbl price points need to be terminated, badly. If they can't find a job, they can go do something like manicure lawns with reel mowers, hoes and rakes; drug around by hand in a big red wagon. Nothing but sweat input, all dollars out are income.


A prime example of another hand-waving dismissal by RGR.

Do you even try to think these things through?

Good grief!
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby DefiledEngine » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 14:16:38

Isn't the problem that if you start taking away energy from people, they might take energy from others to satisfy themselves?
User avatar
DefiledEngine
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 344
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 15:55:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Do you even try to think these things through?


Yes.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 15:57:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ubercrap', '
')They? How do you know you shouldn't be saying I?


No, I don't think so. They is the appropriate pronoun, I believe.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby MonteQuest » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 21:48:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Do you even try to think these things through?


Yes.


Well, honestly, from your responses it does not appear so. There is so much you just gloss over or hand wave off.

Not the Big Picture I see.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 22:21:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Do you even try to think these things through?

Yes.

Well, honestly, from your responses it does not appear so. There is so much you just gloss over or hand wave off.
Not the Big Picture I see.


I think we do see mostly the same thing ahead, but I think you are missing a piece of the big picture. Not so much in regard to what will happen, but rather in what the heavy-user countries have already decided they are going to attempt. Basically, the folks of your persuasion want to see a powerdown, return to basics, sustainable ag, etc. The populations of these nations on the other hand have considered the question (organically, as a 200 gigaton organism), and have decided they'd rather take a one in twenty shot at continued, unlimited growth, instead of accepting a rationally constructed period of contraction.

The things I am suggesting are in concert with this gamble. I know that this is exactly the kind of thing the various green movements want to not only avoid, but avoid talking about; and thats ok with me.

The Gamble means that humanity, as an organism, has already decided it is going to use every last drop of recoverable oil, every last pound of diggable coal, and every last rad of uranium on the planet in order to achieve the mythical and glorious objective of unlimited, eternal growth. In a symbolic, metaphorical sense, Gaia has gotten tired of all her carbon being swiped and locked away, she knows that fusion doesn't work on any scale smaller than a star, and so she invented us for the sole, exclusive purpose of recovering that which was stolen and putting it back where it belongs. After which we can all go crawl under a rock and die for all she cares.


ie, Homo Sapiens. The Reset Switch.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 00:19:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')I think we do see mostly the same thing ahead, but I think you are missing a piece of the big picture. Not so much in regard to what will happen, but rather in what the heavy-user countries have already decided they are going to attempt.


Hardly, I have written many threads and blogs on this alone.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 03:37:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', ' ')I think we do see mostly the same thing ahead, but I think you are missing a piece of the big picture. Not so much in regard to what will happen, but rather in what the heavy-user countries have already decided they are going to attempt.


Hardly, I have written many threads and blogs on this alone.


Then we'll just have to disagree about the level of disagreement then.

Finished "The Weather Makers." Silly fool apprently still thinks China and India aren't going to build a whole fleet of coal fired generators to power those hundreds of millions of new air conditioners.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 04:09:20

Well they are building one per week, so he's more than a fool.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby matt21811 » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 08:08:19

rwwff,
This thread represents some of the most astute dispasionate annalysis of the economics of peak oil , and the human nature of energy consumption as I have seen. Keep up the good work.

Montes replys to effect of "you just dont get it" instead of an actual counter arguement show how spot on you are. He will normally put up some kind of arguement. I guess economics isnt his strong suite.

Thanks Mate.
User avatar
matt21811
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat 21 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby Doly » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 08:24:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'T')he populations of these nations on the other hand have considered the question (organically, as a 200 gigaton organism), and have decided they'd rather take a one in twenty shot at continued, unlimited growth, instead of accepting a rationally constructed period of contraction.


Humanity isn't an organism. Different people will try different things.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby rwwff » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 09:21:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'T')he populations of these nations on the other hand have considered the question (organically, as a 200 gigaton organism), and have decided they'd rather take a one in twenty shot at continued, unlimited growth, instead of accepting a rationally constructed period of contraction.


Humanity isn't an organism. Different people will try different things.


One termite turns left, one termite turns right.
One bee flies to yellow, one bee flies to white.

Yet the termite and the bee also have life as a collective organism; and their genetic propagation is really indepedent of any particular termite or bee's survival.

Humans are different only in the scale of our software and our capacity to devastate the landscape. We are social mammals; part of us works like an individual, we go left to the dentist, we go right to the grocery store. Some of us like roses, some of us like orchids. Some of us catch fish, some of us grow corn. The other part works on the scale of nations or groups of nations; and one of those groups is a collection of the US, China, and India (Japan, Austrailia, etc included). This collection can't just up and give a speech, but neither can a termite mound; but you know what the termine mound is doing by observing its overall impact. We know what this Humanity Mound is doing also by its overall impact; and in this particular case this Humanity Mound has decided that it will risk everything in an attempt to continue growth.

Who knows, maybe I'm wrong, and fusion is merely a decade or few away, and maybe there is really enough power available at that time to do a roll out of new fusion plants; but I'm afraid the odds are pretty long, and the stakes are counted in billions of human lives. But what is plainly obvious is that this collective organism has already placed the wager on the table; its just a matter of time before the results are read and the winners paid.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Energy and the Mother of Invention

Postby galacticsurfer » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 09:23:47

If a real crisis hit and an emergency regime were declared enabling a war time economy with emphasis on renewables there would be enough oil or coal or whatever to achieve the replacement of nonrenewable energy infrastructure with renewable worldwide. the political will is not there supposedly(at least at the national level in the USA), or is it? In California or Germany or China wind mills and solar cells are popping up like weeds and gasoline taxes and fuel efficiency standards are being expanded.

Calculation:

1000 000 000 000 barrels left.
How many windmills/solar cells does the world need to replace the terrawatt capacity of the current system? How much energy will it take to build this system(BTU per construction per solar cell or per wind mill)?

Plan:

divert 3 billion barrels per year of current oil use(or some % of current electricity use) to production of renewables by either a price mechanism or rationiing of car use or whatever or a profit mechanism for building the renewables which are now very popular. In ten or twenty years we have enough electricity/energy to at least survive at the level of some middle income countries with war time gardening and no cars and no big die off(except where population overshoot has gone way too far (chindia)or the message about conservatiuon was not taken seriously soon enough(USA)). Gradually we build up this renewable infrastructure using ocal or whatever energy is left until we can use renewable energy itself to construct renewables.


Basic question. Is it all that good that we survive? All other animals did not endanger the earth itself. Perm and Jurassic were finished off by meteors. Apparently supervolcanoes almost finsihed us off 70,000 years ago and accelerated our evolution.

Inventing our way out of trouble(in the modern technical sense of invention) just means making a more efficient way of using energy in order to expand population and use (misuse) limited resources, whatever these might be . Even if we get to this perfect world with windmills and stuff people have not changed and will want more stuff and power.

However a best case scenario is from Jared Diamond's collapse book Papua New Guinea or the small island of 120 people like a garden where excess people committed suicide when there were over 120 people. These two islands are in theory perpetually capable of living over millions of years without change, like Gardens of Eden. What you need then is a stable technology, and not scientific industrialism, but something which allows self control over natural processes to stay in balance with nature, from which we originate anyway.

Unfortunately people have banned "God" as superstition and believe they can do what they want as scientific rationalism and capitalism(socialistic/communistic or western form included) eliminates the need for a conscience outside of personal greedy needs and for any sensible long term planning where it interferes with profit and quarterly reports (or at max 5 year central planning)so probably they do not get the big picture and will burn up all the oil and coal in their hummers until there isn't any left to build windmills and also will have too many babies until we come to overshoot like bacteria in a petri dish with 12 billion people and like on Easter island, with no trees and living from cannibalism
in caves until 99% of population is gone.

No atheists in foxholes. We gotta ask basic questions about who we are and where we are going on "our road to nowhere" while we are"waiting for Godot" in our surreal irreality. Unfortunately God won't interfere with us anymore than the supposed aliens will come on the roof of the Whitehouse to give us some gee whiz technology to save our butts. Basically however oil is a sort of perpetual motion machine which we have exploited to the max, inventing a lot of new ideas and enjoying unparalleled and unlimited success(for a 150 year time period) as species but like in a fairy tale it has come time to pay the piper. No party without a hangover. No such thing as a free lunch. Every reaction has an equal and oppositie reaction. Karma-payback time dudes.
"The horror, the horror"
User avatar
galacticsurfer
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed 09 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests

cron